Forensic linguistics: A scientometric review

References

• Adank, P., Evans, B. G., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S. K. (2009). Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 520–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitchison, J., & Wardaugh, R. (1987). An introduction to sociolinguistics. The British Journal of Sociology, 38(3), 436. https://doi.org/10.2307/590702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alduais, A., Alduais, A., Alfadda, H., & Allegretta, S. (2022). Clinical linguistics: Analysis of mapping knowledge domains in past, present and future. Children, 9(8), 1202. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9081202
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ali, J. H. (2020). Forensic linguistics: A study in criminal speech acts. Beni-Suef University International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.21608/buijhs.2020.91333
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, L., Brown, Q., Tate, B., Nias, J., Brewer, R., & Irwin, G. (2014). Designing smarter touch-based interfaces for educational contexts. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0749-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, D. (2005). Questions and answers in the English courtroom (1640–1760) (Vol. 135). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.135
   Google Scholar
• Ariani, M. G., Sajedi, F., & Sajedi, M. (2014). Forensic linguistics: A brief overview of the key elements. Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences, 158, 222–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.078
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J., & French, P. (1990). Forensic phonetics. Pinter Publishers ‎.
   Google Scholar
• Balog, K., Azzopardi, L., & De Rijke, M. (2006). Formal models for expert finding in enterprise corpora. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1145/1148170.1148181
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Entman, R. M. (Eds.), (2000). Mediated Politics Communication in the Future of Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berk-Seligson, S. ‎. (2002). The bilingual courtroom: Court interpreters in the judicial process‎. Chicago University Press‎.
   Google Scholar
• BERK-SELIGSON, S. (1988). The impact of politeness in witness testimony: The influence of the court Interpreter. Multilingua - Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 7(4), 411–440. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1988.7.4.411
   Google Scholar
• Berk-Seligson, S. (1990). The bilingual courtroom: Court interpreters in the judicial process‎. University of Chicago Press‎.
   Google Scholar
• Berk-Seligson, S. (1999a). The impact of court interpreting on the coerciveness of leading questions. Forensic Linguistics, 6(1), 30–56. https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.1999.6.1.30
   Google Scholar
• Berk-Seligson, S. (1999b). The impact of court interpreting on the coerciveness of leading questions. Speech, Language and the Law, 6(1), 30–56. https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.1999.6.1.30/
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre language use in professional settings. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, T. K., & Ritchie, W. C. (2012). Multilingualism and forensic linguistics. In The Handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (pp. 671–699). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118332382.ch27
   Google Scholar
• Biel, L., & Engberg, J. (2013). Research models and methods in legal translation. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series – Themes in Translation Studies, (12), 12. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v12i.316
   Google Scholar
• Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, S. (2012). History of forensic linguistics. In The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0508
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (1999). The debate is open. In Language Ideological Debates (pp. 1–38). DE GRUYTER MOUTON. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808049.1
   Google Scholar
• Brederoo, S. G., Nadema, F. G., Goedhart, F. G., Voppel, A. E., De Boer, J. N., Wouts, J., Koops, S., & Sommer, I. E. C. (2021). Implementation of automatic speech analysis for early detection of psychiatric symptoms: What do patients want? Journal of Psychiatric Research, 142, 299–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeders, A. P. A. (2001). Forensic speech and audio analysis forensic linguistics. 1998 to 2001. A review. Proceedings of the 13th INTERPOL Forensic Science Symposium, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, M. (1930). English in the law courts: The part that articles, prepositions and conjunctions play in legal ‎decisions. Frederick Ungar‎.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butters, R. R. (2011a). Forensic linguistics. Journal of English Linguistics, 39(2), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111403849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butters, R. R. (2011b). Forensic linguistics. Journal of English Linguistics, 39(2), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111403849/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro, D., Novais, P., & Neves, J. (2014). Information Retrieval. Law, Governance and Technology Series, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06239-6_7
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, J. (2019). Law, language, and knowledge: Legal transplants from a cultural perspective. German Law Journal, 20(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.4
   Google Scholar
• Chellappandi, P., & Vijayakumar, C. S. (2018). Bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics/cybermetrics, informetrics and altmetrics - An emerging field in library and information science research. International Journal of Education, 7(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2529398
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. (2014). The CiteSpace Manual: Version 1.01 (pp. 1–84). http://cluster.ischool.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/CiteSpaceManual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. (2016). CiteSpace: A practical guide for mapping scientific literature. In Novinka (Issue December 2016). http://www.dobraca.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CiteSpacePracticalGuide-Nova-Sample1-50pp.pdf%0Ahttp://cluster.cis.drexel.edu/~cchen/citespace/books/
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Chung, W., Xu, J. J., Wang, G., Qin, Y., & Chau, M. (2004). Crime data mining: A general framework and some examples. Computer, 37(4), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2004.1297301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., & Wu, Z. (2021). The discourse of security: Language, illiberalism and governmentality. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(3), 406–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1785900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, J. M., & O’Barr, W. M. (1998). Just words: Law, language, and power. Chicago University Press‎.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, J. M., & O’Barr, W. M. (2002). Back to the trobriands: The enduring influence of malinowski’s crime and custom in savage society. Law & Social Inquiry, 27(4), 847–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2002.tb00984.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornu, G. (2014). Dictionary of the civil code. LEXISNEXIS.
   Google Scholar
• Correa, M. (2013). Forensic linguistics: An overview of the intersection and interaction of language and law. Studies About Languages, (23). https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.23.5020
   Google Scholar
• Cotterill, J. (2000). Reading the rights: A cautionary tale of comprehension and comprehensibility. Forensic Linguistics, 7(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2000.7.1.4
   Google Scholar
• COTTERILL, J. (2001). Domestic discord, rocky relationships: semantic prosodies in representations of marital violence in the O.J. simpson trial. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterill, J. (Ed.). (2002). Language in the legal process. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522770
   Google Scholar
• Cotterill, J. (2003). Language and power in court: A linguistic analysis of the OJ Simpson trial‎. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M. (1995). Questioning statements: Forensic applications of linguistics‎. University of Bermigham‎.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M. (2007a). An introduction to forensic linguistics. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969717
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M. (2007b). The linguist as expert witness. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v1i1.39
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2007). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence‎. Routledge ‎.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2010). The routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. In The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855607
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (2017a). An introduction to forensic linguistics language in evidence (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (2017b). An introduction to forensic linguistics: language in evidence (2nd ed.). Routledge ‎.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (2017c). An introduction to forensic linguistics language in evidence. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M., Montgomery, M., & Brazil, D. (2014). Studies in discourse analysis (RLE linguistics B: Grammar). In M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery Eds., Studies in discourse analysis (Vol. 27). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315857336
   Google Scholar
• Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Gamon, M., & Dumais, S. (2011). Mark my words! Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW ’11, 745. https://doi.org/10.1145/1963405.1963509
   Google Scholar
• de Vel, O., Anderson, A., Corney, M., & Mohay, G. (2001). Mining e-mail content for author identification forensics. ACM SIGMOD Record, 30(4), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/604264.604272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durant, A. (2022). Peter goodrich, advanced introduction to law and literature (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton MA, USA). Law & Literature, 34(2), 119. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685x.2021.2011049.
   Google Scholar
• Eades, D. (1994). A case of communicative clash: Aboriginal English and the legal system. In J. P. Gibbons (Ed.), Language and the law ‎ (pp. 234–264). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eades, D. (2005). Applied linguistics and language analysis in asylum seeker cases. Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eades, D. (2007). Cross examination of Aboriginal children: The Pinkenba case. Indigenous Law Bulletin, 6(25), 11–13. http://anu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3JTsMwEB1BuXBhK4iySP6BQBJncegprShU9FAp7dlyvEgVUiqVFvh8xlmagjjBNXKsmTxn3tieBYD6d67zwyaEMol9oVnAVKI8gz54FPqMqVwhHTJDv_eGgablZo12VUN0sW5CptVSbuzZWVbld_VVUYZxubabVh93qbhRmqTTdB8O7DWcXf0v03R7t5CEbtX
   Google Scholar
• Egghe, L. (1994). Little science, big science… and beyond. Scientometrics, 30(2–3), 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engberg, J. (2012). Word meaning and the problem of a globalized legal order. In The oxford handbook of language and law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0013
   Google Scholar
• Engen, M., Fransson, M., Quist, J., & Skålén, P. (2021). Continuing the development of the public service logic: A study of value co-destruction in public services. Public Management Review, 23(6), 886–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1720354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., Pardoe, S., & Szerszynski, B. (2006). Critical Discourse Analysis and Citizenship. In Hausendorf, H., & Bora, A. (Eds.), Analysing Citizenship Talk: Social positioning in political and legal decision-making processes (pp. 98–123). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.19.09fai
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, P., & Coulthard, M. (2013). Editorial Introduction. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, 1(1), vii–ix. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v1i1.vii
   Google Scholar
• French, J. P., & Harrison, P., R -V-Ingram, C., Ingram, D. and Whittock, T. (2004). The who wants to be a millionaire? fraud trial.” International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, 11(1). 131–145 https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v11i1.131
   Google Scholar
• Gao, J. (2010). Review and prospects of the research of forensic linguistics in China. Asian Social Science, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n10p127
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. (2010). Attitudes to Language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844713
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J. (2001a). Externalism and knowledge of the attitudes. The Philosophical Quarterly, 51(202), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J. (2001b). Revising the language of New South Wales police procedures: Applied linguistics in action. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 439–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.4.439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J. P. (1994a). Language and the law. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J. P. (1994b). Language constructing law. In John, P. G. (Ed.), Language and the Law ‎ (1st ed) (pp. 3–10). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1994). Little scientometrics, big scientometrics … and beyond? Scientometrics, 30(2–3), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018107
   Google Scholar
• Golev, N. D., Kim, L. G., & Saveleva, I. V. (2021). Variability of news interpretation in political discourse (A case study of the internet materials covering the 2014 and 2018 winter Olympic Games). Journal of Siberian Federal University Humanities & Social Sciences, 14(4), 568–583. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0743
   Google Scholar
• Grant, T. (2007). Quantifying evidence in forensic authorship analysis. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v14i1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, T., & Baker, K. (2001). Identifying reliable, valid markers of authorship: A response to Chaski. Forensic Linguistics, 8(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2001.8.1.66
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2002a). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. In G. H. Gudjonsson (Ed.), The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713297
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2002b). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. In G. H. Gudjonsson (Ed.), The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713297/
   Google Scholar
• Guimarães, F. F., Finardi, K. R., & Casotti, J. B. C. (2019). Internationalization and language policies in brazil: What is the relationship? Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 19(2), 295–327. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6398201913553
   Google Scholar
• Hale, S., & Gibbons, J. (1999). Varying realities: Patterned changes in the interpreter’s representation of courtroom and external realities. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.2.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardcastle, R. A. (1993). Forensic linguistics: An assessment of the CUSUM method for the determination of authorship. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 33(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-7368(93)72987-4
   Google Scholar
• Haworth, K. (2006). The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse. Discourse & Society, 17(6), 739–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506068430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffer, C. (2012). Narrative navigation. Narrative Inquiry, 22(2), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.22.2.04hef
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, M. (2011). Paths to Post-Nationalism. In Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of Language and Identity. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746866.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Heydon, G. (2005). The language of police interviewing. In The language of police interviewing. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502932
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J., & Wilson, N. (2022). An introduction to sociolinguistics (6th ed). Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Houtman, H., & Suryati, S. (2018). The History of Forensic Linguistics as an Assisting Tool in the Analysis of Legal Terms‎. Sriwijaya Law Review‎, 2(2), ‎215–232‎. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol2.Iss2.135.pp215-233
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Glänzel, W., & Zhang, L. (2021). Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains. Scientometrics, 126(7), 6201–6224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03821-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunyadi, L. (2003). Forensic linguistics: Its contribution to humanities computing. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/18.1.49
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, C. (2005). Authority and expertise in forensic linguistics. Language & Communication, 25(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2005.01.001
   Google Scholar
• The International Association for Forensic and Legal Linguistics. (n.d.). The International Association for Forensic and Legal Linguistics (IAFLL). Retrieved August 5, 2022, from https://www.iafl.org/
   Google Scholar
• Jaki, T., De Smedt, S., Gwóźdź, M., Panchal, R., Rossa, A., & De Pauw, G. (2019). Online hatred of women in the incels.Me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict2, 7(2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00026.jak
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A., & Coulthard, M. (2010). Introduction: Current debates in forensic linguistics. In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, S. N. (2002). Forensic Linguistics: The linguistic analyst and expert witness of language evidence in criminal ‎trials‎. Biola University.
   Google Scholar
• Juola, P. (2008). Authorship attribution. Now Publishers Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2003a). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code? Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 770–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2003b). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code? Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 770–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.770/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoyi, A. M., & Behnam, B. (2014). Discourse of Law: Analysis of cooperative principles and speech acts in Iranian Law Courts. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 02(04), 2321–2454.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, J. (2002). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining - KDD ’02, 91. https://doi.org/10.1145/775060.775061
   Google Scholar
• Kniffka, H. (2000). Anonymous authorship analysis without comparison data? A case study with methodological implications. Proceedings of the Biennial International Conference of the IAFL (pp. 179–198). Westdeutscher Verlag, Wiesbaden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Kniffka, H. (2007). A heuristic author and writer/typist taxonomy. In Working in language and law (pp. 149–165). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590045_7
   Google Scholar
• Koppel, M., Schler, J., & Argamon, S. (2009). Computational methods in authorship attribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzé, E. F. (2010). Author identification from opposing perspectives in forensic linguistics. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 28(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2010.519111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiman, J., & Sidtis, D. (2011). Foundations of voice studies. In Foundations of voice studies: An interdisciplinary approach to voice production and perception. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395068
   Google Scholar
• Limberger, B. K., Kürschner, S., Altenhofen, C. V., & Mozzillo, I. (2020). Minority languages. Revista Linguagem & Ensino, 23(4), 894–899. https://doi.org/10.15210/rle.v23i4.19938
   Google Scholar
• Lippi-Green, R. (1994). Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts. Language in Society, 23(2), 163–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, N., & Wright, D. (2020). Forensic linguistics. In S. Adolphs & D. Knight (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English language and digital humanities (1st ed. p. 18). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matosian, G. (1993). Reproducing Rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom‎. Chicago University Press‎.
   Google Scholar
• Mattila, H. E. S. (2006). Comparative jurislinguistics: A discipline in statu nascendi. Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Matulewska, A., & Gwiazdowicz, D. J. (2020). Cyberbullying in Poland: A case study of aggressive messages with emojis targeted at the community of hunters in urbanized society. Social Semiotics, 30(3), 30(3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1731194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus Linguistics. In Corpus Linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395
   Google Scholar
• McMenamin, G. (1993). Forensic Stylistics‎. Elsevier‎.
   Google Scholar
• McMenamin, G. R. (2002). Forensic Linguistics Advances in Forensic Stylistics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Melinkoff, D. (1963). The language of the law‎. Little Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Mertz, E. (2007). The language of law school: Learning to “think Like a Lawyer.”. Oxford University Press‎.
   Google Scholar
• Mollema, N. (2019). New frontiers in forensic linguistics: themes and perspectives in language and law in Africa and Beyond. Language Matters, 50(3), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2019.1690556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. El profesional de la información, 29(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrisett, G., Walker, D., Crary, K., & Glew, N. (1999). From system F to typed assembly language. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 21(3), 527–568. https://doi.org/10.1145/319301.319345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakane, I. (2007). Problems in communicating the suspect’s rights in interpreted police interviews. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogueira López, A. (2018). “Neither a bad word nor a good action”: State and autonomous community indifference towards international undertakings to protect Galician arising from the ecrml. Journal of Language and Law, (69), 78–90.
   Google Scholar
• O’Barr, W. (1982). Linguistic Evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom‎. Academic Press‎.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, J. (2008). Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction To Language, Crime and the Law. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, J. (2009). No Wordcrime: Solving crime through forensic linguistics. A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, J. (2011). Kneaded Language: Concrete poetry and new media in the Swedish 1960s. Modernism/modernity, 18(2), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2011.0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, J., & Luchjenbroers, J. (2014). Forensic linguistics‎. Bloomsbury Publishing‎.
   Google Scholar
• Parera, E. P., & Pujolràs, A. P. (2021). Jurisprudence by the Spanish constitutional court. Revista de Llengua i Dret, 76. https://doi.org/10.2436/rld.i76.2021.3759
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, M. (2011). The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators. Library Management, 32(3), 226–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121111112934
   Google Scholar
• Penfold, R. (2020). Using the Lens database for staff publications. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 108(2), 520–522. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, R. C. (2021). The application of forensic linguistics in cybercrimeinvestigations. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pay097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, R., & Grant, T. (2013). Forensic Linguistics. In Encyclopedia of forensic sciences (pp. 174–177). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382165-2.00030-1
   Google Scholar
• Philbrick, F. A. (1949). Language and the law: The semantics of forensic english. The Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 47(6), 871. https://doi.org/10.2307/1284298
   Google Scholar
• Poscher, R. (2012). The principle theory: How many theories and what is their merit? In M. Klatt (Ed.), Institutionalizing Reason. Perspectives on the legal philosophy of Robert Alex (pp. 218–247). Oxford University Press. 2012 .
   Google Scholar
• Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(12), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
   Google Scholar
• Prieto Ramos, F. (2014). Legal translation studies as interdiscipline: Scope and evolution. Meta, 59(2), 260–277. https://doi.org/10.7202/1027475ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickford, J. R., & King, S. (2016a). Language and linguistics on trial: Hearing Rachel Jeantel (and other vernacular speakers) in the courtroom and beyond. Language, 92(4), 948–988. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickford, J. R., & King, S. (2016b). Language and linguistics on trial: Hearing Rachel Jeantel (and other vernacular speakers) in the courtroom and beyond. Language, 92(4), 948–988. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0078/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehling, M. (2017). The important but neglected legal context of virtual teams: Research implications and opportunities. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, P. (2002). Forensic speaker identification. In Forensic speaker identification. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203166369
   Google Scholar
• Shapero, J. J. (2011). The language of suicide notes‎. University of Birmingham ‎.
   Google Scholar
• Shuy, R. (2002). Linguistic battles in trademark disputes. In Linguistic battles in trademark disputes. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230554757
   Google Scholar
• Shuy, R. W. (1996). Language Crimes: The Use and Abuse of Language Evidence in the Courtroom. The Language Library. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shuy, R. W. (1997). Discourse clues to coded language in an impeachment hearing. In Guy, G. R., Feagin, C., Schiffrin, D., & Baugh, J. (Eds.), Towards a Social Science of Language: Papers in honor of William Labov (pp. 121). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.128.10shu
   Google Scholar
• Shuy, R. W. (2005). Creating language crimes. In Creating language crimes: How law enforcement uses (and misuses) language. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195181661.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Shuy, R. W. (2006). Linguistics in the courtroom: A practical guide‎. Oxford University Press‎.
   Google Scholar
• Shuy, R. W. (2011). The language of perjury cases. In The language of perjury cases. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795383.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. (2018). Forensic and automatic speaker recognition system. International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.11591/IJECE.V8I5.PP2804-2811
   Google Scholar
• Solan, L. M. (2013). Jurors as statutory interpreters. In The Language of Statutes (pp. 196–222). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226767987.003.0007
   Google Scholar
• Solan, L. M., & Tiersma, P. M. (2005). Speaking of Crime The Language of Criminal Justice. The Chicago Series in Law and Society. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sooryamoorthy, R. (2020). Scientometrics for the humanities and social sciences. In Scientometrics for the humanities and social sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003110415
   Google Scholar
• Sousa Silva, R., Laboreiro, G., Sarmento, L., Grant, T., Oliveira, E., & Maia, B. (2011). ‘Twazn me! ;(’ automatic authorship analysis of micro-blogging messages. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22327-3_16
   Google Scholar
• Surahman, A. (2021). An analysis of voice spectrum characteristics to the male voices recording using praat ‎software‎. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguistic)‎, 2(2), ‎69–74‎.
   Google Scholar
• Svarvik’s, J. (1968). The Evans statements: A Case for forensic linguistics‎. University of Gothenburg Press‎.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (2016). Le concept de communauté de discours : quelques réflexions. ASp, 69(69), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.4774
   Google Scholar
• Syrett, K., Austin, J. R., Sánchez, L., Germak, C., Lingwall, A., Perez-Cortes, S., Arias-Amaya, A., & Baker, H. (2016). The influence of conversational context and the developing lexicon on the calculation of scalar implicatures: Insights from Spanish-English bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7(2), 230–264. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.14019.syr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The International Association for Forensic and legal Linguistics (IAFLL). (n.d.). The International Association for Forensic and legal Linguistics. https://iafll.org/
   Google Scholar
• The International Association for Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics. (n.d.). ‎International association for forensic phonetics and acoustics‎.
   Google Scholar
• The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law. (n.d.). International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law.
   Google Scholar
• Tiersma, P. (2008). The nature of legal language. 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.5.03tie
   Google Scholar
• Tiersma, P. (2011). The Rule of Text: Is It Possible to Govern Using (Only) Statutes. New York University Journal of Law & Liberty, 6(2), 261–289.
   Google Scholar
• Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal Language ‎. Chicago University Press‎.
   Google Scholar
• Tiersma, P. M. (2002). The language and law of product warnings. In Language in the legal process (pp. 54–71). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522770_4
   Google Scholar
• Tiersma, P., & Curtis, M. (2008). Testing the Comprehensibility of Jury Instructions: California’s Old and New Instructions on Circumstantial Evidence. Journal of Court Innovation, 1(2), 231–261.
   Google Scholar
• Tiersma, P. M., & Solan, L. (2002). The linguist on the witness stand: forensic linguistics in American courts. Language, 78(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2002.0135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, I. G., Luque, B., Lacasa, L., Kello, C. T., & Hernández-Fernández, A. (2019). On the physical origin of linguistic laws and lognormality in speech. Royal Society Open Science, 6(8), 6(8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Totty, R. N., Hardcastle, R. A., & Pearson, J. (1987). Forensic linguistics: The determination of authorship from habits of style. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 27(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-7368(87)72702-9
   Google Scholar
• Udina, N. (2017). Forensic linguistics implications for legal education: Creating the e-textbook on language and law. Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences, 237, 1337–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.219
   Google Scholar
• Umiyati, M. (2020). A literature review of forensic linguistics. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguisti, 1(1), 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285–320). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
   Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2022). Vosviewer Manual: Manual for VOSviewer version 1 .6.18. In Leiden: Univeristeit Leiden (Issue January). http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & van den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varney, M. H. (1997). Forensic linguistics. English Today, 13(4), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400010014
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, F., Hamann, H., & Gauer, I. (2018). Computer-assisted legal linguistics: corpus analysis as a new tool for legal Studies. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(04), 1340–1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12305
   Google Scholar
• Wang, B. X., Hughes, V., & Foulkes, P. (2022). The effect of sampling variability on systems and individual speakers in likelihood ratio-based forensic voice comparison. Speech Communication, 138, 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2022.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, R. (2019). ‘National’ and ‘official’ languages across the independent Asia-pacific. PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 16(1–2), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.5130/portalv16i1/2.6510
   Google Scholar
• Zeifert, M., & Tobor, Z. (2021). Legal translation versus legal interpretation. a legal-theoretical perspective. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 35(5), 1671–1687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09837-7
   Google Scholar