Framing environmental discourse. Greta Thunberg, metaphors, blah blah blah!

References

• Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2005). A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak
   Google Scholar
• Bedford, D., & Cook, J. (2016). Climate change: Examining the facts. ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarek, M. (2010). Evaluation in the news: A methodological framework for analysing evaluative language in journalism. Australian Journal of Communication, 37(2), 15–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, Z., & Ossewaarde, R. (2020). Youth climate activists meet environmental governance: ageist depictions of the FFF movement and Greta Thunberg in German newspaper coverage. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 15(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2020.1745211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullon-Cassis, L. (2024). ‘A game show at the end of the world’ The currency of youth in UN climate summitry. Journal of Youth Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2023.2296667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris-Black, J. (2009). Metaphor and political communication. In A. Musolff, & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourse (pp. 99–115). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlin, J., & Hauck, C. (2023). What kind of hero is greta?. In M. Etherington (Ed.), Environmental education: An interdisciplinary approach to nature. Wipf & Stock.
   Google Scholar
• Dorota, H., & Nakonieczna-Bartosiewicz, J. (2021). Young activists as international norm entrepreneurs: A case study of Greta Thunberg’s campaigning on climate change in Europe and beyond. Studia Europejskie Studies in European Affairs, 25(2), 117–152.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. Y. (2005). Victims, villains, and vixens. Teen girls and internet crime. In S. R. Mazzarella (Ed.), Girl wide web: girls, the internet and the negotiation of identity (pp. 13–31). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996-2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207311247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardelle, L. and Sorlin, S. (Eds.) (2015). The pragmatics of personal pronouns. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goatly, A. (2000). Critical reading and writing: an introductory coursebook. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goatly, A. (2006). Ideology and metaphor. English Today, 22(3), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078406003051
   Google Scholar
• Goatly, A. (2022). Two dimensions of meaning: Similarity and contiguity in metaphor and metonymy, language, culture, and ecology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Hågvar, Y. B. (2013). Djevelen ligger i diskursen – En kritisk diskursanalyse av Marte Krogh-saken i VG. Norsk Medietidsskrift, 20(3), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN0805-9535-2013-03-02
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1992). New ways of analysing meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In M. Pütz Thirty years of linguistic evolution (p. 59). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2010). On language and linguistics. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2023). Frames, framing and framing effects in cognitive CDA. Discourse Studies, 25(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231155071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravinik, M. (2010). Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation: Towards a systematization of CDA analytical categories in the representation of social groups. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900903453948
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, B. (2011). Metaphors for environmental sustainability: redefining our relationship with nature. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leann, L. E. (2020). The Greta Effect: How does Greta Thunberg use the discourse of youth in her movement for climate justice? A thesis submitted to faculty of Arts in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of “Ba Honorus Communication and Mesia Studies”, Calgary, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, G. (2016). Principles of pragmatics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marthe, E. W. (2020). How dare she? A critical discourse analysis of Greta Thunberg. A thesis submitted to faculty of Social Science Department of Sociology and Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (1999). Grace: The logogenesis of freedom. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001003
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Power, solidarity and change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, (49), 179–202. http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/29390
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2003). The language of evaluation (Vol. 2). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S. (2020). Framing a climate crisis A descriptive framing analysis of how Greta Thunberg inspired the masses to take to the streets. A thesis submitted of Department of Government, Development studies C. Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Oktar, L. (2001). The ideological organization of representational processes in the presentation of us and them. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 313–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, B. (2023). Spiked. Global boiling? Don’t be ridiculous. Retrieved from https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/07/31/global-boiling-dont-be-ridiculous/
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. S., Liu, Q., & Kaye, B. K. (2021). Analysis of ageism, sexism, and ableism in user comments on youtube videos about climate activist Greta Thunberg. Social Media and Society, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211036059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyzou, A. (2015). Presupposition in discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 12(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2014.991796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponton, D. M. (2022). Ecolinguistics and positive discourse analysis: Convergent pathways. MediAzioni, 34(1), A36–A54. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1974-4382/15506.
   Google Scholar
• Ryalls, E. D., & Mazzarella, S. R. (2021). “Famous, beloved, reviled, respected, feared, celebrated:” media construction of Greta Thunberg. Communication, Culture and Critique, 14(3), 438–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcab006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. (2021). The Nation is not Enough: A Post-Structural Discourse Analysis of Greta Thunberg’s Global Populism. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Populism, 2021(2), 58–83.
   Google Scholar
• Sjögren, H. (2020). Longing for the past: An analysis of discursive formations in the Greta Thunberg Message, Culture Unbound, 2020: XX–XX Published by Linköping University Electronic Press. http://www.cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/
   Google Scholar
• Skilbeck, A. (2020). ‘A thin net over an abyss’: Greta Thunberg and the Importance of Words in Addressing the Climate Crisis. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(4), 960–974. volumeAugust 2020, Pageshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrede, J. (2017). Kritisk diskursanalyse. Cappelen Damm akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stibbe, A. (2018). Positive discourse analysis: Rethinking human ecological relationships. In A. Fill & H. Penz (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics (pp. 165–179). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suryaningsih, Y. (2021). A critical discourse analysis of personal pronouns in Greta Thunberg’s speech. Saga: Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.21460/saga.2020.21.34
   Google Scholar
• Thunberg, G. (2019). No one is too small to make a difference. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, A. (2008). Sound foundations: Learning and teaching pronunciation. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, J. W., Wodak, R., & Khosravinik, M. (2016). Critical discourse studies and social media data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp. 277–294). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Ideological discourse analysis. New Courant, 4(1), 135–161.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C. Rosa Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard. Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–70). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vesa, P. (2019). Who speaks for Earth? Climate discourses and voice in Greta Thunberg’s speech in UN Climate Action. A thesis submitted to faculty of Hummanities English Philology, University of Oulu.
   Google Scholar
• Vu, H. T., Blomberg, M., Seo, H., Liu, Y., Shayesteh, F., & Do, H. V. (2021). Social media and environmental activism: Framing climate change on Facebook by global NGOs. Science Communication, 43(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15(1), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2008). ‘Us’ and ‘them’: Inclusion and exclusion - discrimination via discourse. In G. Delanty, R. Wodak, & P. Jones (Eds.), Identity, belonging and migration (pp. 54–77). Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar