208
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

“Misfitting” and Friendship in the Virtuous Life: Neurodiversity and Moral Formation

References

  • Annas, J. (2011). Intelligent virtue. Oxford University Press.
  • Barnbaum, D. (2008). The ethics of autism: Among them, but not of them. Indiana University Press.
  • Barnes, E. (2016). The minority body: A theory of disability. Oxford University Press.
  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
  • Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with apserger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:Jadd.0000022607.19833.00
  • Belek, B. (2019) 2023. Autism. The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by Felix Stein. Fascimile of tthe first edition in Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Online: https://doi.org/10.29164/19aut
  • Brewer, T. (2005). Virtues we can share: Friendship and Aristotelian ethical theory. Ethics, 115(4), 721–758. https://doi.org/10.1086/430489
  • Cassidy, S., Ropar, D., Mitchell, P., & Chapman, P. (2014). Can adults with autism spectrum disorder infer what happened to someone from their emotional response? Autism Research : official Journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 7(1), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1351
  • Cates, D. (1996). Choosing to feel: Virtue, friendship, and compassion for friends. University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Chapman, R. (2019). Autism as a form of life: Wittgenstein and the psychological coherence of autism. Metaphilosophy, 50(4), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12366
  • Clark, P. M. (2014). The case for the exemplarist approach to virtue in catholic moral theology. Journal of Moral Theology, 3(1), 54–82.
  • Clifton, S. (2018). Crippled grace: Disability, virtue ethics, and the good life. Baylor University Press.
  • Cloutier, D., & Ahrens, A. H. (2020). Catholic moral theology and the virtues: Integrating psychology in models of moral agency. Theological Studies, 81(2), 326–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040563920928563
  • Dempsey, E., Moore, C., Richard, A. E., & Smith, I. M. (2020). Moral foundations theory in autism spectrum disorder: A qualitative investigation. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 24(8), 2202–2212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320939331
  • Edey, R., Cook, J., Brewer, R., Johnson, M., Bird, G., & Press, C. (2016). Interaction takes two: Typical adults exhibit mind-blindness towards those with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(7), 879–885. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000199
  • Fein, E. (2018). Autism as a mode of engagement. In E. Fein & C. Rios (Eds.), Autism in translation: An intercultural conversation on autism spectrum conditions (pp. 129–154). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Fein, E. (2020). Living on the spectrum: Autism and youth in community. New York University Press.
  • Garland-Thomson, R. (2011). Misfits: A feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia, 26(3), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01206.x
  • Hauerwas, S., & Pinches, C. (1997). Christians among the virtues: Theological conversations with ancient and modern ethics. University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Herdt, J. (2015). Varieties of contemporary Christian virtue ethics. In L. Besser-Jones & M. Slote (Eds.), The Routledge companion to virtue ethics (pp. 223–236).
  • Jackson, T. (2003). The priority of love: Christian love and social justice. Princeton Univesrity Press.
  • Jacobs, N. L., & Richardson, R. (2022). At the gates: Disability, justice, and the churches. Darton, Longman & Todd Ltd.
  • Komeda, H., Kosaka, H., Saito, D., Mano, Y., Jung, M., Fujii, T., Yanaka, H., Munesue, T., Ishitobi, M., Sato, M., & Okazawa, H. (2015). Autistic empathy toward autistic others. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu126
  • Kristjansson, K. (2020). Aristotelian character friendship as a ‘method’ of moral education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(4), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09717-w
  • Livingston, L., Colvert, E., Bolton, P., & Happe, F. (2019). Good social skills despite poor theory of mind: Exploring compensation in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 60(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12886
  • Markram, H., Rinaldi, T., & Markram, K. (2007). The intense world syndrome – An alternative hypothesis for autism. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 1(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.01.1.1.006.2007
  • Markram, K., & Markram, H. (2010). The Intense world theory – A unifying theory of the neurobiology of autism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4(224), 224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00224
  • McLaren, K. (2013). The art of empathy: A complete guide to life’s most essential skill. Sounds True.
  • Milton, D. E. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: The ‘double empathy’ problem. Disability & Society, 27(6), 883–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.710008
  • MacIntyre, A. (2016). Ethics in the conflicts of modernity: An essay on desire, practical reasoning, and narrative. Cambridge University Press.
  • Myers, N. A. L. (2016). Recovery stories: An anthropological exploration of moral agency in stories of mental health recovery. Transcultural Psychiatry, 53(4), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461516663124
  • Nothwehr, D. M. (2016). Bonaventure of Bagnoregio’s Imatatio Christi as an agapistic virtue ethics. In D. V. Meconi (Ed.), On earth as it is in heaven: Cultivating a contemporary theology of creation (pp. 123–145). Catholic University of America Press.
  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512
  • Pripas-Kapit, S. (2020). Historicizing Jim Sinclair’s ‘don’t mourn for us’: A cultural and intellectual history of neurodiversity’s first manifesto. In S.K. Kapp (Ed.), Autistic community and the neurodiversity movement (pp. 23–38). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8437-0_2
  • Reinders, H. S. (2008). Receiving the gift of friendship: Profound disability, theological anthropology, and ethics. William B Eerdmans Press.
  • Rosello, B., Berenguer, C., Baixauli, I., Garcia, R., & Miranda, A. (2020). Theory of mind profiles in children with autism spectrum disorder: Adaptive/social skills and pragmatic competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 567401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567401
  • Sinclair, J. (2012). “Don’t Mourn for Us.” Autonomy, the Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies. Original work published in Our Voice 1.3 (1993), the Autism Network International newsletter. https://philosophy.ucsc.edu/SinclairDontMournForUs.pdf, accessed May 15, 2023.
  • Snow, N. E. (2010). Virtue as social intelligence: An empirically grounded theory. Routledge Books.
  • Sheppard, E., Pillai, D., Tze-Lynn Wong, G., Ropar, D., & Mitchell, P. (2016). How easy is it to read the minds of people with autism spectrum disorder? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(4), 1247–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2662-8
  • Shoemaker, D. (2015). Responsibility from the margins. Oxford University Press.
  • Sterponi, L. (2004). Construction of rules, accountability and moral identity by high-functioning children with autism. Discourse Studies, 6(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604041768
  • Swinton, J. (2012). Reflections on autistic love: What does love look like? Practical Theology, 5(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1558/prth.v5i3.259
  • Williams, B. A. O., Nagel, T. (1976). Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 50: 115-135 and 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/50.1.115
  • Zagzebski, L. (2017). Exemplarist moral theory. Oxford University Press.
  • Zimmerman, M. J. (2015). Moral luck reexamined. In David Shoemaker (Ed.), Oxford studies in agency and responsibility (Vol. 3, pp. 136–159). Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.