Contralateral internal mammary vessels – a rescue recipient vessels option in breast reconstruction

References

• Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32(1):32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atisha DM, Rushing CN, Samsa GP, et al. A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(2):361–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy BD, Kerrebijn I, Farhadi J, et al. Indications and controversies for abdominally-based complete autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2018;45(1):83–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opsomer D, Vyncke T, Depypere B, et al. Lumbar flap versus the gold standard: comparison to the DIEP flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(4):706E–714E.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekiguchi K, Kawamori J, Yamauchi H. Breast reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy: complications by type and timing and other problems in radiation oncology. Breast Cancer. 2017;24(4):511–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(6):1585–1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van Landuyt K, et al. Algorithm in choosing recipient vessels for perforator free flap in breast reconstruction: The role of the internal mammary perforators. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57(3):258–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nahabedian M. The internal mammary artery and vein as recipient vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(5):537–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint-Cyr M, Youssef A, Bae HW, et al. Changing trends in recipient vessel selection for microvascular autologous breast reconstruction: an analysis of 1483 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(7):1993–2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill AC, Hayward V, Zhong T, et al. Usability of the internal mammary recipient vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2016;69(7):907–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan SM, Rizzo AM, Erhard HA, et al. Revisiting the internal mammaries as recipient vessels in breast reconstruction: considerations in current practice. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;184(2):255–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppard W, Pomposelli T, Chang EI, et al. Internal mammary usability as recipient vessels in DIEP breast reconstruction in the setting of previous radiation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2018;71(8):1123–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, et al. Demystifying the use of internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(4):763–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann DP, Crosby MA, Selber JC, et al. Optimal timing of delayed free lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(3):1100–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple CLF, Strom EA, Youssef A, et al. Choice of recipient vessels in delayed TRAM flap breast reconstruction after radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(1):105–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deramo P, Martinez CA, Boutros SG. Use of single-recipient vessels for cross-chest abdominal flap-based breast augmentation as an outpatient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;8(7):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeltzer AA, Andrades P, Hamdi M, Blondeel PN, et al. The use of a single set of internal mammary recipient vessels in bilateral free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):153–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosutic D, Lambe GF. The use of single recipient internal mammary vessels for bilateral diep flap breast reconstruction in a recipient-vessel-depleted patient. Microsurgery. 2018;38(1):120–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JJ, Chao LF, Wu CW, et al. Simultaneous scarless contralateral breast augmentation during unilateral breast reconstruction using bilateral differentially split DIEP flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(6):593–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Varon DE, Halvorson EG. Unilateral internal mammary recipient vessels for bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;5(6):1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satake T, Muto M, Kou S, et al. Contralateral unaffected breast augmentation using zone IV as a SIEA flap during unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2019;72(9):1537–1547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opsomer D, D'Arpa S, Benmeridja L, et al. Bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction to a single set of internal mammary vessels: technique, safety, and outcomes after 250 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(4):554e–5564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhuaire M, Hivelin M, Dramé M, et al. Determining the best recipient vessel site for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: an anatomical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2017;70(6):781–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran SL, Nava G, Behnam AB, et al. An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective study of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(6):1876–1882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muto M, Satake T, Masuda Y, et al. Absent internal mammary recipient vein in autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;8(2):1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradas-Irun C, Azzawi K, Malata CM. A plea for recipient vascular pedicle versatility in microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(2):383e–3385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durhan G, Erdemir AG, Yuce Sari S, et al. Does internal mammary node irradiation for breast cancer make a significant difference to the diameter of the internal mammary artery? Correlation with computed tomography. Breast Care. 2020;15(6):635–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosnot J, Fischer JP, Smartt JM, et al. Does previous chest wall irradiation increase vascular complications in free autologous breast reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(2):496–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JJ, Wu CW, Leon Lam W, et al. Simultaneous contralateral breast reduction/mastopexy with unilateral breast reconstruction using free abdominal flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67(4):336–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang EI, Selber JC, Chang EI, et al. Choosing the optimal timing for contralateral symmetry procedures after unilateral free flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74(1):12–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ML, Clarke-Pearson EM, Vornovitsky M, et al. The efficacy of simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral balancing procedures in reducing the need for second stage operations. Arch Plast Surg. 2014;41(5):535–541.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giordano S, Harkkila S, Oranges CM, et al. Immediate versus delayed contralateral breast symmetrisation in breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap: a comparative study. Breast Care. 2019;14(5):272–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar