References
- Arrow, K. (1978). The future and the present in economic life. Economic Inquiry, 16, 157–169.https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.1978.16.issue-2
- Baumol, W. (2000). What Marshall didn’t know: On the twentieth century’s contributions to economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1–44.
- Boland, L. (1979). A critique of Friedman’s critics. Journal of Economic Literature, 17, 503–522.
- Brown, E. (1972). The underdevelopment of economics. The Economic Journal, 82, 1–10.https://doi.org/10.2307/2230205
- Caballero, R. (2010). Macroeconomics after the crisis: Time to deal with the pretense-of-knowledge syndrome. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 85–102.https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.4.85
- Coase, R. (1992). The institutional structure of production. American Economic Review, 82, 713–719.
- Dasgupta, P. (2002). Modern economics and its critics. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Fact and fiction in economics (pp. 57–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Friedman, M. (1946). Lange on price flexibility and employment. A methodological criticism. American Economic Review, 36, 613–631 (Reprinted in Essays in positive economics, pp. 277–300). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in positive economics (pp. 3–43). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Friedman, M. (2009). Final word. In U. Mäki (Ed.), The methodology of positive economics. Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy (355 p.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Frisch, R. (1970). Econometrics in the world today. In W. Eltis, F. Scott, & J. Wolfe (Eds.), Induction, growth, and trade: Essays in honour of Sir Roy Harrod (pp. 152–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hausman, D. (1992). The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752032
- Hawking, S. (2010). Into the universe with Stephen Hawking. Time travel. Discovery Communications, DVD Video.
- Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.
- Hayek, F. A. (1974). The pretence of knowledge (Prize Lecture). The Sveriges Riskbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.
- Klamer, A. (1984). The new classical macroeconomics. Conversations with the new classical economists and their opponents. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.
- Kreps, D. (1997). Economics, the current position. Daedalus, 126, 59–85.
- Krugman, P. (2009, September 2). How did economists get it so wrong? The New York Times.
- Krugman, P. (2014, September 14). How to get it wrong? The New York Times.
- Leontief, W. (1970). Theoretical assumptions and unobserved facts. American Economic Review, 61, 1–3.
- Lucas, Jr., R. E. (1995, December 7). Monetary neutrality (Prize Lecture).
- Lucas, Jr., R. E., & Prescott, E. C. (1971). Investment under uncertainty. Econometrica, 39, 659–681.https://doi.org/10.2307/1909571
- Mäki, U. (1986). Rhetoric at the expense of coherence: A reinterpretation of Milton Friedman’s methodology. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 4, 129–143.
- Mäki, U. (1992). Friedman and realism. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 7, 171–195.
- Mäki, U. (2000). Kinds of assumptions and their truth: Shaking an untwisted F-twist. Kyklos, 53, 317–335.https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.2000.53.issue-3
- Mäki, U. (2001). The way the world works (www): Towards an ontology of theory choice. In U. Mäki (Ed.), The economic world view. Studies in the ontology of economics (pp. 369–389). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mäki, U. (Ed.). (2002a). Fact and fiction in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mäki, U. (2002b). The dismal queen of the social sciences. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Fact and fiction in economics (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mäki, U. (Ed.). (2009a). The methodology of positive economics. Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mäki, U. (2009b). Reading the methodological essay in twentieth-century economics: Map of multiple perspectives. In U. Mäki (Ed.), The methodology of positive economics. Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy (pp. 47–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Mäki, U. (2009c). Unrealistic assumptions and unnecessary confusions: Rereading and rewriting F53 as a realist statement. In U. Mäki (Ed.), The methodology of positive economics. Reflections on the Milton Friedman legacy (pp. 90–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Melitz, J. (1965). Friedman and Machlup on the significance of testing economic assumptions. Journal of Political Economy, 73, 37–60.https://doi.org/10.1086/jpe.1965.73.issue-1
- Muth, J. (1961). Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica, 29, 315–335.https://doi.org/10.2307/1909635
- Nagel, E. (1963). Assumptions in economic theory. American Economic Review, 53, 211–219.
- Popp, D. (2002). Induced innovation and energy prices. American Economic Review, 92, 160–180.https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015658
- Rabin, M., & Vayanos, D. (2010). The gambler’s and hot-hand fallacies: Theory and applications. Review of Economic Studies, 77, 730–778.https://doi.org/10.1111/roes.2010.77.issue-2
- Rotwein, E. (1959). On “The methodology of positive economics”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73, 554–575.https://doi.org/10.2307/1884303
- Solow, R. (1997). How did economics get that way and what way did it get? Daedalus, 126, 39–58.
- Sterling, B. (2013). Science fiction (literature and performance). Encyclopaedia Britannica [Online].
- Tobin, J. (1980). Asset accumulation and economic activity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.