Change and prediction of income and fertility rates across countries

References

• Barro, R. J., & Becker, G. S. (1989). Fertility choice in a model of economic growth. Econometrica, 57, 481–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In G. S. Becker (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–240). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S., & Barro, R. J. (1988). A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 1–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., & Tamura, R. (1990). Haman capital, fertility, and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 81, S12–S37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhabib, J., & Nishimura, K. (1989). Endogenous fluctuations in the Barro--Becker theory of fertility. In A. Wening (Ed.), Demographic change and economic development. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, M. (1997). Testing for convergence: Evidence from non-parametric multimodality tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12, 393–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. (1992). Tests of the “convergence hypothesis": A critical note (CEPR Discussion Papers 691). C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
   Google Scholar
• Dahan, M., & Tsiddon, D. (1998). Demographic transition, income distribution, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 29–52.
   Google Scholar
• Doepke, M. (2005). Child motality and fertility decline: Does the Barro--Becker model fit the facts? Journal of Population Economics, 18, 337–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterlin, R. A. (1966). On the relation of economic factors to recent and projected fertility changes. Demography, 3, 131–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fern\’{a}ndez-Villaverde, J. (2001). Was Malthus right? Economic growth and population dynamics ( Working Paper, Department of Economics). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Fraley, C., Raftery, A. E., Murphy, T. B., & Scrucca, L. (2012). mclust Version 4 for R: Normal mixture modeling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation ( Technical Report No. 597). Seattle, WA: Department of Statistics, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Galor, O. (2011). Unified growth theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galor, O., & Weil, D. N. (1996). The gender gap, fertility, and growth. American Economic Review, 86, 374–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzmann, H., Vollmer, S., & Weisbrod, J. (2007). Twin peaks or three components? Analyzing the world’s cross-country distribution of income ( Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research Discussion Papers, 162).Goettingen: Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research (IAI).
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, D. (1996). Demographic transition theory. Population Studies, 50, 361–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer, M. (1993). Population growth and technological change: One million B.C. to 1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 681–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., & Russell, R. R. (2002). Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: Relative contributions to growth and convergence. American Economic Review, 92, 527–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, A. (1934). La Révolution Démographique [The demographic revolution]. Paris: Sirey.
   Google Scholar
• Lapan, H. E., & Enders, W. (1990). “Endogenous fertility, ricardian equivalence, and debt management policy". Journal of Public Economics, 41, 227–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, S. M. (2010). Introduction to applied Bayesian statistics and estimation for social scientists. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, T. E. (2009). Old habits die hard (sometimes): What can department heterogeneneity tell us about the French fertility decline? ( Working Paper). Milano: Bocconi University.
   Google Scholar
• Nerlove, M., Assaf, R., & Efraim, S. (1978). Household and economy: Welfare economics of endogenous fertility. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Notestein, F. (1945). Population: The long view. In T. Schultz (Ed.), Food for the world (pp. 36–57). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paapaa, R., & van Dijk Herman, K. (1998). Distribution and mobility of wealth of nations. European Economic Review, 42, 1269–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, L., & Kanaya, S. (2010). The concavity of the value function of the extended Barro--Becker model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34, 314–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quah, D. T. (1996). Twin peaks: Growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics. Economic Journal, 106, 1045–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strulik, H., & Vollmer, S. (2010). The fertility transition around the World 1950--2005. Boston, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. S. (1929). Population. American Journal of Sociology, 34, 959–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, L. (2010). Demographic change and economic growth: Simulations on growth models. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, D. N. (2013). Economic growth. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar