https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2036-7809
References
- Bligh, D. A. (1998). What’s the use of lectures? Bristol: Intellect books.
- Boyle, J. T., & Nicol, D. J. (2003). Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. Research in Learning Technology, 11(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0968776030110305
- Broussard, B. (2012). To click or not to click: Learning to teach to the microwave generation. Nurse Education in Practice, 12, 3–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2011.03.013
- Bruff, D. (2009). Teaching with classroom response systems: Creating active learning environments. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970–977. doi:https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
- Cutts, Q. I., Kennedy, G.E., Mitchell, C., & Draper, S. (2004). Maximising dialogue in lectures using group response systems. Paper presented at the 7th IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, Hawaii.
- Draper, S. W., & Brown, M. I. (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00074.x
- Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., Leonard, W. J., Mestre, J. P., & Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7, 3–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02948592
- Freeman, M., Bell, A., Comerton-Forde, C., Pickering, J., & Blayney, P. (2007). Factors affecting educational innovation with in class electronic response systems. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 149–170.
- Gauci, S., Dantas, A., Williams, D., & Kemm, R. (2009). Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system. Advances in Physiology Education, 33, 60–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00109.2007
- Koenig, K. (2010). Building acceptance for pedagogical reform through wide-scale implementation of clickers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39, 46–50.
- Kolikant, Y. B.-D., Drane, D., & Calkins, S. (2010). “Clickers” as catalysts for transformation of teachers. College Teaching, 58, 127–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/87567551003774894
- Laurillard, D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881735
- Nielsen, K. L., Hansen, G., & Stav, J. B. (2013). Teaching with student response systems (SRS): Teacher-centric aspects that can negatively affect students’ experience of using SRS. Research in Learning Technology, 21. doi:https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.18989
- O’Donoghue, M., Jardine, R., & Rubner, G. (2010). Developing a hierarchy of clicker use for teaching and learning from models of dialogue analysis. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2010, 2105–2114.
- O’Donoghue, M., & O’Steen, B. (2007). Clicking on or off? Lecturers’ rationale for using student response systems. In Proceedings Ascilite, Singapore.
- Shulman, L. S. (2005). Pedagogies of uncertainty. Liberal Education, 91, 18–25.
- Simpson, V., & Oliver, M. (2007). Electronic voting systems for lectures then and now: A comparison of research and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 187–208.
- Traxler, J., & Wishart, J. M. (2011). Making mobile learning work: Case studies of practice ( Discussion Papers in Education). Bristol: ESCalate, HEA Subject Centre for Education.