1,153
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The relationship between faculty characteristics and the use of norm- and criteria-based grading

& | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1127746 | Received 19 Oct 2015, Accepted 27 Nov 2015, Published online: 25 Jan 2016

References

  • Aviles, C. B. (2001). Grading with norm-referenced or criterion-referenced measurements: To curve or not to curve, that is the question. Social Work Education, 20, 603–608.10.1080/02615470120072869
  • Becker, W. E., & Rosen, S. (1992). The learning effect of assessment and evaluation in high school. Economics of Education Review, 11, 107–118.10.1016/0272-7757(92)90002-K
  • Betts, J. (1995). Do grading standards affect the incentive to learn? (Working Paper). San Diego, CA: University of California.
  • Bishop, J. (1996). The impact of curriculum-based external examinations on school priorities and student learning. International Journal of Education Research, 23, 653–752.
  • Bishop, J. (1997). The effect of national standards and curriculum-based exams on achievement. American Economic Review, 87, 260–264.
  • Bishop, J. (1999). Are national exit examinations important for educational efficiency? Swedish Economic Policy Review, 6, 349–398.
  • Covington, M. V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171–200.10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.171
  • Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Evidence of students’ evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education, 34, 151–211.10.1007/BF00992161
  • Freeman, D. (1999). Grade divergence as a market outcome. Journal of Economic Education, 30, 344–351.10.1080/00220489909596091
  • Ginther, D. K., & Kahn, S. (2004). Women in economics: Moving up or falling off the academic career ladder? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 193–214.10.1257/0895330042162386
  • Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes. American Psychologist, 18, 510–522.
  • Guskey, T. R. (2000). Grading policies that work against standards … and how to fix them. NASSP Bulletin, 84, 20–29.10.1177/019263650008462003
  • Krautmann, A. C., & Sander, W. (1999). Grades and student evaluations of teachers. Economics of Education Review, 18, 59–63.10.1016/S0272-7757(98)00004-1
  • Landeras, P. (2009). Student effort: Standards vs. tournaments. Applied Economics Letters, 16, 965–969.10.1080/13504850701222129
  • Mason, P. M., Steagall, J. W., & Fabritius, M. M. (2003). The changing quality of business education. Economics of Education Review, 22, 603–609.10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00025-6
  • McPherson, M. A., Jewell, R. T., & Kim, M. (2009). What determines student evaluation scores? A random effects analysis of undergraduate economics classes. Eastern Economic Journal, 35, 37–51.10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050042
  • Sadler, D. R. (2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 175–194.10.1080/0260293042000264262
  • Warning, S., & Welzel, P. (2005). A note on grade inflation and university competition. Paper presented at the EARIE 2005 conference. Retrieved from http://www.fep.up.pt/conferences/earie2005/cd_rom/Session%20III/III.L/warning.pdf
  • Winzer, M. (2002). Grade inflation: An appraisal of the research. University of Lethbridge. Retrieved July 8, 2008, from http://people.uleth.ca/~runte/inflation/Inflationb.pdf