On the stability of the money multiplier in Nigeria: Co-integration analyses with regime shifts in banking system liquidity

References

• Arai, Y., & Kurozumi, E. (2007). Testing for the null hypothesis of cointegration with a structural break. Econometric Reviews, 26, 705–739.10.1080/07474930701653776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghestani, H., & Mott, T. (1997). A cointegration analysis of US money supply process. Journal of Macroeconomics, 19, 269–283.10.1016/S0164-0704(97)00015-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, J., & Perron, P. (2003). Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(1), 1–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-David, D., & Papell, D. (1997). Slowdowns and meltdowns: Post war growth evidence from 74 countries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 28, 561–571.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, A. (1998). Modelling money demand in Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 13, 57–76.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomhoff, E. (1977). Predicting the money multipler. Journal of Monetary Economics, 3, 325–345.10.1016/0304-3932(77)90026-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitre, V. (1986). Quarterly predictions of reserve money multipler and money stock in India. Arthavijnana, 28, 1–119.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doguwa, S. I. (1994). The multiplier approach to money supply process in Nigeria. CBN Economic and Financial Review, 32, 390–418.
   Google Scholar
• Doguwa, S. I. (1997). On the stability of money multiplier relations in Nigeria: An alternative testing procedure. CBN Economic and Financial Review, 35(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Driffill, J., & Sola, M. (1998). Intrinsic bubbles and regime switching. Journal of Monetary Economics, 42, 357–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1986). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 52, 251–276.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, N., Hendry, D., Mizon, F., & Grayham, E. (1998). Exogeneity, cointegration, and economic policy analysis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16, 370–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feige, E. L., & Parkin, M. (1971). The optimal quantity of money, bonds, commodity inventories, and capital. The American Economic Review, 61, 335–349. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1813431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. L., & Morris, J. L. (1996). The money multiplier, simple sum, divisia and innovation-divisia monetary aggregates: Cointegration tests for the UK. Applied Economics, 28, 705–714.10.1080/000368496328452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darbha, G. (2002). Testing for long-run stability–An application to money multiplier in India. Applied Economics Letters, 9, 33–37.10.1080/13504850110047155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, A. W., & Hansen, B. E. (1996). Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of Econometrics, 70, 99–126.10.1016/0304-4076(69)41685-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, G., & Kim, J. R. (1995). The stability of German money demand: Tests of the cointegration relation. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 131, 286–301.10.1007/BF02707436
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. I., Leybourne, S. J., & Taylor, A. R. (2014). Unit root testing under a local break in trend using partial information on the break date. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 76, 93–111.10.1111/obes.2014.76.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, D., & Ericsson, N. (1991). Modeling the demand for narrow money in the United Kingdom and the United States. European Economic Review, 35, 833–881.10.1016/0014-2921(91)90039-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannes, J. M., & Rasche, R. H. (1981). Can the reserve approach to monetary control really work. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 13, 298–313.10.2307/1991900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachane, D. M. (1992). Money multiplier in India: Short-run and long-run aspects. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 8, 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Nachane, D. M., & Ray, D. (1989). Money multiplier: A reexamination of the Indian evidence. Indian Economic Journal, 37, 56–73.
   Google Scholar
• Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57, 1361–1401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perron, P., & Yabu, T., (2009). Testing for shifts in trend with an integrated or stationary noise component. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 27, 369–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M., & Shin, Y. (1996). Cointegration and speed of convergence to equilibrium. Journal of Econometrics, 71, 117–143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piehl, A.M., Cooper, S. J., Braga, A.A., & Kennedy, D.M., (1999). Testing for structural breaks in the evaluation of programs. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research
   Google Scholar
• Ray, P., & Madhusoodan, T. P. (1992). Predicting the money multiplier: The Indian evidence revisited. Reserve Bank of India Occassional Papers, 13, 121–140.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, K., & Vaidya, R. (1997). The process of financial liberalization in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uchendu, O. A. (1995). Can money supply in Nigeria be controlled through base money? An empirical analysis. CBN Economic and Financial Review, 33, 284–316.
   Google Scholar
• Valadkhani, A., Layton, A. P., & Pahlavani, M. (2005). Multiple structural breaks in Australia’s macroeconomic data: An application of the lumsdaine and papell test. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 2, 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Zivot, E., & Andrews, D., (1992), Further evidence of great crash, the oil price shock and unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 251–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar