Corporate governance, research and development volatility and firm performance - Evidence from Spain and Ireland

References

• Baber, W. R., Fairfield, P. M., & Haggard, J. A. (1991). The effect of concern on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development. The Accounting Review, 66, 818–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barroso Castro, C., Villegas Periǹan, M. M., & Perez-Calero, L. (2010). What are effective boards of directors? The effectiveness of the council and the results of the company. Investigacines Europeas de Direcciȏn y Economia de la Empresa, 16, 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, M., Carcello, J., & Hermanson, D. (1999). Fraudulent financial reporting: 1987–1997. An analysis of U.S. public companies. Jersey City, NJ: AICPA.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., Esther, D., & Sendhil, M. (2003). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? (Working Paper No. 8841, 2002). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Black, B. S., Jang, H., & Kim, W. (2006). Does corporate governance predict firms’ market values? Evidence from Korea. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 22, 366–413.10.1093/jleo/ewj018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. (1997). Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 693–728.10.1162/003355397555325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review, 73, 305–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 639–660.10.2307/3069408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Cheung, Y.-L., Stouraitis, A., & Wong, A. W. S. (2005). Ownership concentration, firm performance, and dividend policy in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, 431–449.10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. (2004). R&D expenditures and CEO compensation. The Accounting Review, 79, 305–328.10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, P., & Evans, R. (1997). Non-executive directors: A question of independence. Corporate Governance, 5, 224–231.10.1111/corg.1997.5.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Conyon, M. J., & Peck, S. I. (1998). Board size and corporate performance: Evidence from European countries. The European Journal of Finance, 4, 291–304.10.1080/135184798337317
   Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1994). Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1603–1617.10.2307/256801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P., Hitt, M. A., & Gimeno J. (2001). The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 144–157.10.2307/3069342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Andres, P. A., Azofra, V., & Lopez, F. (2005). Corporate boards in OECD Countries: Size, composition, functioning and effectiveness. Corporate Governance, 13, 197–210.10.1111/corg.2005.13.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechow, P. M., & Sloan, R. G. (1991). Executive incentives and the horizon problem. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14, 51–89.10.1016/0167-7187(91)90058-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degeorge, F., Patel, J., & Zeckhauser, R. (1999). Earnings management to exceed thresholds. The Journal of Business, 72, 1–33.10.1086/jb.1999.72.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (1990). The ethereal hand: Organisational economics and management theory. Academy of Management Review, 15, 369–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J., Richardson, G., Dyckman, T., & Dukes, R. (1984). The impact of SFAS No. 2 on firm expenditures on research and development: Replications and extensions. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 85–102.10.2307/2490702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288–307.10.1086/260866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.10.1086/467037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., & D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1079–1108.10.2307/256667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 484–503.10.2307/2393314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoriou, R. N. (2009). The banking crisis handbook. London: Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9781439818541
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 16–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Review, 9, 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Inkpen, A., & Ramaswamy, K. (2005, September 24). Global strategy (264 p.). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195167207.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jermias, J. (2007). The effects of corporate governance on the relationship between innovative efforts and performance. European Accounting Review, 16, 827–854.10.1080/09638180701707045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong, A., DeJong, D. V., Mertens, G., & Wasley, C. (2000). The role of self-regulation in corporate governance: Evidence and Implications from the Netherlands. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 473–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, W. Q., Naoumova, I., & Koutzevol, N. (2003). Corporate governance and firm performance in Russia: An empirical study. Journal of World Business, 38, 385–396.10.1016/j.jwb.2003.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 189–205. doi:10.1111/1467-8683.00318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 489–496.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.10.1086/250042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization and value relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21, 107–138.10.1016/0165-4101(95)00410-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loderer, C., & Peyer, U. (2002). Board overlap, seat accumulation and share prices. European Financial Management, 8, 165–192.10.1111/eufm.2002.8.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, 301–318.10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Muller-Kahle, M. I., & Lewellyn, K. B. (2011). Did board configuration matter? The case of US subprime lenders. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19, 405–417.10.1111/corg.2011.19.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakes, A. (1985). On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 390–409.10.1086/261305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paredes, C., & Núñez-Lagos, R. (2015, March). The corporate governance review in Spain (5th ed.). (Willem J. L. Calkoen, Ed.). London: Law Business Research.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S., & Grinaker, R. (1994). Earnings expectations and discretionary research and development spending. Accounting Horizons, 8, 43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 349–364.10.2307/2391668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Ferández, M. (2015, October). Company financial performance: Does board size matter? Case of the EUROSTOXX50 index. Cuadernos de Gestión, 15 (2), 15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, T. (2008). Creative destruction in R&D: On the relationship between R&D expenditure volatility and firm performance (PhD thesis, 136 p.). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. 3326384
   Google Scholar
• van Essen, M., Engelen, P. J., & Carney, M. (2013). Does “good” corporate governance help in a crisis? The impact of country- and firm-level governance mechanisms in the European financial crisis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21, 201–224.10.1111/corg.2013.21.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whit, P. (2014, March). The corporate governance review in Ireland (4th ed.). (Willem J. L. Calkoen, Ed.). London: Law Business Research.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (2007). Corporate boards of directors: In principle and in practice. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 24, 247–272.10.1093/jleo/ewm059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105, 581–606.10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–211.10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar