Women on boardroom: Does it create risk?

References

• Adams, R. B., & Fereira, D. (2004). Gender diversity in the boardroom (ECGI Finance Working Paper 57). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bfc1/02d254103620d1d24d59c86f465c1398800f.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309.10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science, 58, 219–235.10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R. B., & Ragunathan, V. (2013). Lehman sisters. Unpublished Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, S., Baird, S., & Frye, M. (2003). Do female mutual fund managers manage differently? Journal of Financial Research, 26(1), 1–18.10.1111/jfir.2003.26.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 261–292.10.1162/003355301556400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basyith, A. (2016). Corporate governance, intellectual capital and firm performance. Research in Applied Economics, 8, 17–41. Retrieved from http://macrothink.org/journal/index.php/rae/article/viewFile/8675/745410.5296/rae.v8i1
   Google Scholar
• Basyith, A., Idris, M., & Fitriya, F. (2014). The gender effect on small business enterprises’ firm performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, D., & Menkhoff, L. (2008). Will women be women? Analyzing the gender difference among financial experts. Kyklos, 61, 364–384.10.1111/kykl.2008.61.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, A. N., Kick, T., & Schaeck, K. (2014). Executive board composition and bank risk taking. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 48–65.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M. (2011). New perspectives on gender. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (pp. 1543–1590). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business case for women corporate directors’. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors (pp. 25–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-90-481-3401-4
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, Z., & Tharenou, P. (2000). What distinguishes women non-executive directors from executive directors? Individual, interpersonal and organizational factors related to women’s appointments to boards’. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors (pp. 75–96). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, R. J. (1994). Women on corporate boards of directors: Views of Canadian chief executive officers. Women in Management Review, 9, 3–10.10.1108/09649429410066974
   Google Scholar
• Burke, R. J., & Kurucz, E. (1998). Demographic characteristics of Canadian women corporate directors. Psychological Reports, 83, 461–462.10.2466/pr0.1998.83.2.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367.10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 639–660.10.2307/3069408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassell, C. (1997). The business case for equal opportunities: Implications for women in management. Women in Management Review, 12, 11–16.10.1108/09649429710162893
   Google Scholar
• Catalyst. (1995). The CEO view: Women on corporate boards. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Governance, Institutions & Organisations Report (2012). Annual Report 2011/2012. NUS Business School: National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Chava, S., & Purnanandam, A. (2010). CEOs versus CFOs: Incentives and corporate policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 97, 263–278.10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosentino, N., Montalto, F., Donato, C., & via, A. (2012). Gender diversity in the corporate boardroom: Do women affect risk? Rivista di Politica Economica, 2, 73–95.
   Google Scholar
• Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 448–474.10.1257/jel.47.2.448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. (1999). A decade of corporate women: Some progress in the boardroom, none in the executive suite. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 93–100.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., Eagly, A. H., & Kulesa, P. (2002). Accuracy and bias in stereotypes about the social and political attitudes of women and men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 268–282.10.1006/jesp.2001.1511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). Men, women, and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1, 1061–1073.10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00113-8
   Google Scholar
• Elsaid, E., & Ursel, N. D. (2011). CEO succession, gender, and risk-taking. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 26, 499–512.10.1108/17542411111175478
   Google Scholar
• Ertac, S., & Gurdal, M. Y. (2012). Deciding to decide: Gender, leadership, and risk-taking in groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, 24–30.10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccio, M., Marchica, M. T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender and corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193–209.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauzi, F., & Locke, S. (2012). Board structure, ownership structure and firm performance: A study of New Zealand listed-firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 8, 43–67. Retrieved from http://web.usm.my/journal/aamjaf/vol%208-2-2012/AAMJAF8-2-2012(43-67).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fondas, N. (2000). Women on corporate boards of directors: Gender bias or power threat. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors (pp. 171–177). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-90-481-3401-4
   Google Scholar
• Fortune Report. (2016). Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2016/01/05/women-boards-equality-report/
   Google Scholar
• Francis, B., Hasan, I., Park, J. C., & Wu, Q. (2010). Gender differences in financial reporting decision-making: Evidence from accounting conservatism (Working Paper). Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Green, E., & Cassell, C. M. (1996). Women managers gendered cultural processes and organizational change. Gender, Work and Organizational, 3, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Halko, M. L., Kaustia, M., & Alanko, E. (2012). The gender effect in risky asset holdings. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, 66–81.10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 941–952.10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., & Kisgen, D. J. (2013). Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? Journal of Financial Economics, 108, 822–839.10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, N. A., & Angelidis, J. P. (1994). Effect of board members’ gender on corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10, 35–40.
   Google Scholar
• ILO. (2016). Women at work: Trends 2016. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ingley, C. B., & van der Walt, N. T. (2001). Board configuration: Building better boards. Corporate Governane: The International Journal of Business in Society, 3, 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36, 620–630.10.1111/ecin.1998.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. E. V., & Powell, P. L. (1994). Decision making, risk, and gender: Are executives different? British Journal of Management, 5, 123–138.10.1111/bjom.1994.5.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Korn Ferry Diversity Scorecard. (2016). Building diversity in Asia Pacific Boardrooms. Korn Ferry-Centre for Governance, Institutions & Organisations, NUS Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Lenard, M. J., Yu, B., & York, E. A. (2014). Impact of board gender diversity on firm risk. Managerial Finance, 40, 787–803. doi:10.1108/MF-06-2013-0164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukil, N., & Yousfi, O. (2015). Does gender diversity on corporate boards increase risk-taking? Canadian Journal of Aministrative Sciences, 33, 66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. D., Nishikawa, T., & Williams, M. A. (2009). CEO gender: Effects on valuation and risk. Quarterly Journal of Finance and Accounting, 48, 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Mattis, M. C. (1997). Women on corporate boards: Two decades of research. International Review of Women and Leadership, 3, 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Meier-Pesti, K., & Penz, E. (2008). Sex or gender? Expanding the sex-based view by introducing masculinity and femininity as predictors of financial risk taking. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 180–196. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, N. (2014). A review of the gender effect on pay, corporate performance and entry into top management. International Review of Economics & Finance, 34, 41–51. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2014.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muldrow, T. W., & Bayton, J. A. (1979). Men and women executives and processes related to decision accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 99–106.10.1037/0021-9010.64.2.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederle, M., & Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1067–1101.10.1162/qjec.122.3.1067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009). Labour market and social policy reviews: Chile. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2012). Gender equality in education, employment and entrepreneurship: Final Report to the MCM. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/employment/50423364.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raghunathan, T. E. (2004). What do we do with missing data? Some options for analysis of incomplete data. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 99–117.10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.102802.124410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosener, J. B. (1990). Way women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68, 119–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, G., & Gill, T. (2000). Applications of evolutionary psychology in marketing. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 1005–1034.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15268–15273. Retrieved from: http://www.pnas.org/content/106/36/15268.full.pdf10.1073/pnas.0907352106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, U., & Traub, S. (2002). An experimental test of loss aversion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 25, 233–249.10.1023/A:1020923921649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010.10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selby, C. C. (2000). From the male locker room to co-executive director boardroom: A twenty-five year perspective. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors (pp. 97–109). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk? Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 26–53.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55, 569–593.10.1108/17410400610702160
   Google Scholar
• Vandegrift, D., & Brown, P. (2005). Gender differences in the use of high-variance strategies in tournament competition. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34, 834–849.10.1016/j.socec.2005.07.028
   Google Scholar
• Women, U. N. (2016). The progress of the World’s Women 2015–2016 (Chapter 2, p. 69).
   Google Scholar
• Weber, A., & Zulehner, C. (2010). Female hires and the success of start-up firms. American Economic Review, 100, 358–361.10.1257/aer.100.2.358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar