References
- Andreoni, J. (1988). Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 37, 291–304.10.1016/0047-2727(88)90043-6
- van Dijk, F., Sonnemans, J., & van Winden, F. (2002). Social ties in a public good experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 275–299.10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00090-1
- Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178.10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
- Isaac, R. M., & Walker, J. M. (1988). Group size effects in public goods provision: The voluntary contributions mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 179–199.10.2307/1882648
- Keser, C., & Gardner, R. (1999). Strategic behavior of experienced subjects in a common pool resource game. International Journal of Game Theory, 28, 241–252.10.1007/s001820050108
- Kreps, D. M., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., & Wilson, R. (1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 245–252.10.1016/0022-0531(82)90029-1
- Kumakawa, T. (2017). Partners and strangers in a common pool resource game: Nasty punishment against strangers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Ostrom, E. (2006). The value-added of laboratory experiments for the study of institutions and common-pool resources. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61, 149–163.10.1016/j.jebo.2005.02.008
- Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9739
- Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992