Competitiveness of Pakistani rice in international market and export potential with global world: A panel gravity approach

References

• Abdullah, M., Li, J., Ghazanfar, S., Ahmed, J., Khan, I., & Ishaq, M. N. (2015). Where Pakistan stands among top rice exporting countries, an analysis of competitiveness. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 22(2), 80–86. doi:10.1016/S1006-8104(15)30036-2
   Google Scholar
• Akhtar, W., Sharif, M., & Shah, H. (2009). Competitiveness of Pakistani fruits in the world market. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 14(2), 125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E. (1979). Theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E., (2016, August 17). The gravity model of economic interaction. Boston College and NBER. Retrieved from https://www2.bc.edu/james-anderson/GravityModel.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E., & Wincoop, E. V. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. The American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192. doi:10.1257/000282803321455214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. E., & Yotov, Y. V. (2016). Terms of trade and global efficiency effects of free trade agreements, 1990-2002. Journal of International Economics, 98, 279–298. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71, 72–95. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33(2), 92–123. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
   Google Scholar
• Balassa, B. (1989). Comparative advantage, trade policy and economic development (pp. 25–27). London: Harvester Wheat Sheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Batra, A., & Khan, Z. (2005). Revealed comparative advantage: An analysis for India and China (pp. 167–168). Indian: Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, S., & Li, K. W. (2002). The changing trade and revealed comparative advantages of Asian and Latin American manufacture exports (pp. 841–843). Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143–153. doi:10.2307/1928061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Econometric Studies, 47(1), 239–253. doi:10.2307/2297111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, Burger, M., Van Oort, F., & Linders, G.-J. (2009). On the specification of the gravity model of trade: Zeros, excess zeros and zero-inflated estimation. Spatial Economic Analysis, 4, 167–190. doi:10.1080/17421770902834327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byers, D. A., Talan, B. I., & Lesser, B. (2000). New borders and trade flows: A gravity model analysis of the Baltic states. Open Economies Review, 11(1), 73–91. doi:10.1023/A:1008305213791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. (1995). An empirical test of competitiveness among major rice exporting countries (pp. 48–49). Department Of Agriculture Economics, Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, N. A, & Novy, D. (2011). Gravity, trade integration, and heterogeneity across industries. Journal of International Economics, 85(2), 206–221.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, A. R. (1993). Does exchange rate volatility depress trade flows? Evidence from error-correction models. Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 700–706. doi:10.2307/2110025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deardorff, A. V. (1998). Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world?. In The regionalization of the world economy (pp. 7–32). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2010). "Aggregation versus Heterogeneity in cross-country growth empirics," CSAE working paper series 2010-32, Centre for the study of African economies, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Ekanayake, E. M., Mukherjee, A., & Veeramacheneni, B. (2010). Trade blocks and the gravity model: A study of economic integration among Asian developing countries. Journal of Economic Integration, 25(4), 627–643. doi:10.11130/jei.2010.25.4.627
   Google Scholar
• Evenett, S., & Keller, W. (2002, April). On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 281–316. doi:10.1086/338746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadeyi, O. A., Bahta, T. Y., Ogundeji, A. A., & Willemse, B. J. (2014). Impacts of the SADC free trade agreement on south african agricultural trade. Outlook on Agriculture, 43(1), 53–59. doi:10.5367/oa.2014.0154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO, (2017). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations database. Accessed on 25 November 2017 (http://www.fao.org/home/en/)
   Google Scholar
• Gul, N., & Yasin, H. M. (2011). The trade potential of Pakistan: An application of the gravity model. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 16(1), 23–62.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmann, S., & Richards, A. (2004). Trade openness: An Australian perspective. Discussion Paper No RDP 2004-11, Reserve Bank of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hallak, J. C. (2006). Product quality and the direction of trade. Journal of International Economics, 68, 238–265. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 441–487. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinloopen, J., & Van, M. C. (2001). On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 137(1), 1–35. doi:10.1007/BF02707598
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, M. (1979). Estimation in truncated samples when there is heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 11, 247–258. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(79)90039-3
   Google Scholar
• Investopedia. (2017). Interesting facts about imports and exports. Retrieved Decmeber 12, 2017 from https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/100813/interesting-facts-about-imports-and-exports.asp
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2015a). Pakistan-China free trade agreement (PCFTA) treaty model: Capabilities, prospects and disputes. Academic Research International, 6(3), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2015b). Rising trend in imports and exports of Pakistan’s FTA partners in recent years. Academic Research International, 6(4), 320–331.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2016). Deltoid analysis of Pakistan-ASEAN-China free trade agreements and opportunities for Pakistan. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 6(5), 228–237. doi:10.18488/journal.aefr/2016.6.5/102.5.228.237
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2017a). Determinants of exports competitiveness: An empirical analysis through revealed comparative advantage of external sector of Pakistan. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 6(3), 623–633. doi:10.18488/journal.aefr.2017.76.623.633
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2017b). The gravity behind South Korea’s international trade: A panel data approach. The Myanmar Journal, 4(2), 76–89.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., & Arshad, H. (2015). One belt and one road: Does China-Pakistan economic corridor benefit for Pakistan’s economy? Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(24), 200–207.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Ayaz, M., & Ali, F. (2016). The role of charismatic World Trade Organization and the expansion of free international trade. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 2(3), 17–23. doi:10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.23.1002
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., & Hao, H. (2014). Boon or Bane: Assessing the environment of China’s free trade agreements with other nations. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(5), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Hao, H., & Arshad, H. (2017). SWOT analysis of Pakistan-China free trade agreement: Pros and Cons. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 7(1), 45–53. doi:10.18488/journal.1
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Shahriar, S., & Arshad, H. (2018a). A panel data analysis of China’s trade pattern with OPEC members: A gravity model approach. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(1), 103–116. doi:10.18488/journal.aefr.2018.81.103.116
   Google Scholar
• Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Shahriar, S., & Ali, F. (2018b). South Korea’s potential export flow: A panel gravity approach. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 8(4), 124–139.
   Google Scholar
• ITC, (2017). International Trade Centre, Trade Map database. https://www.trademap.org/Index.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Kemal, M. A., & Qadir, U. (2005). Real exchange rate, exports and imports movements: A trivarriate analysis. The Pakistan Development Review, 44(2), 177–195.
   Google Scholar
• Lateef, M., Tong, G., Abdullah, M., Mazhar, N.I, Ahmad, Z., & Usman, M.R. (2017). Finding impact of Pakistan-China free trade agreement (PCFTA) on agricultural exports of Pakistan-gravity model approach, International Journal of u- and e-Service, Science and Technology, 10(8), pp.81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K. (1998). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization (pp. 98–130). Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/ Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-W., & Swagel, P. (1997). Trade barriers and trade flows across countries and industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 372–382. doi:10.1162/003465300556968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, Staffan Burenstam (1961), An Essay on Trade and Transformation, Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Linnemann, H. (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Magee, C. S. (2003). Endogenous preferential trade agreements: An empirical analysis. Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2. doi:10.2202/1538-0645.1166
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Zarzoso, I. (2003). Gravity model: An application to trade between regional blocs. Atlantic Economic Journal, 31(2), 174–187. doi:10.1007/BF02319869
   Google Scholar
• Mohmand, Y. T., Salmaan, A., Mughal, K. S., Imran, M., & Makarevic, N. (2015). Export potentials of Pakistan: Evidence from the gravity model of trade. European Journal of Economic Studies, 14(4), 212–220. doi:10.13187/es.2015.14.212
   Google Scholar
• Moscone, F., & Tosetti, E. (2009). “GMM estimation of spatial panels,” MPRA Paper 16327, University Library of Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Papazoglou, C. (2007). Greece’s potential trade flows: A gravity model approach. International Advances in Economic Research, 13(4), 403–414. doi:10.1007/s11294-007-9107-x
   Google Scholar
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240). Retrieved from http://repec.iza.org/dp1240.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Porojan, A. (2001). Trade flows and spatial effects: The gravity model revisited. Open Economies Review, 12(3), 265–280. doi:10.1023/A:1011129422190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasoulinezhad, E, & Kang, G. S. (2016). A panel data analysis of South Koreas trade with OPEC member countries: The gravity model approach. Iranian Economic Review, 20(2), 203–224.
   Google Scholar
• Rasoulinezhad, E. (2017). China’s foreign trade policy with OPEC member countries, Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 10(1), pp. 61–81.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, J. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641–658. doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, J. S., & Tenreyro, S. (2011). Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson pseudomaximum likelihood estimator. Economics Letters, 112, 220–222. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., & Reed, M. R. (2010). Impacts of free trade agreements on agricultural trade creation and trade diversion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92, 1351–1363. doi:10.1093/ajae/aaq076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Findlay, C. (2014). What explains China’s rising trade in services. The Chinese Economy, 46(6), 7–31. doi:10.2753/CES1097-1475460601
   Google Scholar
• Thorbecke, W. (2015). China–US trade: A global outlier. Journal of Asian Economics, 40, 47–58. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, T. (1962). Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. New York, NY: The Twentieth Century Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Trefler, D. (1993). Trade liberalization and the theory of endogenous protection: An econometric study of US import policy. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 138–160. doi:10.1086/261869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath, T. L. (1991). A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127(2), 265–280. doi:10.1007/BF02707986
   Google Scholar
• Westerlund, J., & Wilhelmsson, F. (2011). Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Applied Economics, 43(6), 641–649. doi:10.1080/00036840802599784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xuegang, C., Zhaoping, Y., & Xuling, L. (2008). Empirical analysis of Xinjiang’s bilateral trade: Gravity model approach. Chinese Geographical Science, 18(1), 9–16. doi:10.1007/s11769-008-0009-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S., & Martinez-Zarzoso, I. (2014). A panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of ASEAN–China free trade area. China Economic Review, 29, 138–151. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2014.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar