1,633
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Internationalization via export growth and specialization in Finnish regions

| (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1514574 | Received 10 Feb 2018, Accepted 27 Jul 2018, Published online: 13 Sep 2018

References

  • Altomonte, C., Aquilante, T., Békés, G., & Ottaviano, G. I. (2013). Internationalization and innovation of firms: Evidence and policy. Economic Policy, 28(76), 663–700.
  • Balassa, B. (1965). Tariff protection in industrial countries: An evaluation. Journal of Political Economy, 73(6), 573–594. doi:10.1086/259085
  • Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2010). Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 203–224. doi:10.1257/jep.24.1.203
  • Caldera, A. (2010). Innovation and exporting: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Review of World Economics, 146(4), 657–689. doi:10.1007/s10290-010-0065-7
  • Cantwell, J. (1989). Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Cambridge, MA: B. Blackwell.
  • Corrado, C., Hulten, C., & Sichel, D. (2005). Measuring capital and technology: An expanded framework. In C. Corrado, J. Haltiwanger, & D. Sichel (Eds.), Measuring capital in the new economy (pp. 11–46). Chicaco, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Corrado, C., et al. (2014). Intangibles and industry productivity growth: Evidence from the EU. Retrieved from: www.intan-invest.net.
  • D’Agostino, L. M., Laursen, K., & Santangelo, G. D. (2013). The impact of R&D offshoring on the home knowledge production of OECD investing regions. Journal of Economic Geography, 13(1), 145–175. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbs012
  • Dalum, B., Laursen, K., & Verspagen, B. (1999). Does specialization matter for growth? Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(2), 267–288. doi:10.1093/icc/8.2.267
  • Diewert, W. E., & Fox, K. E. (2010). On measuring the contribution of entering and exiting firms to aggregate productivity growth. In W. Erwin Diewert, B. M. Balk, & D. Fixler (Eds.), Price and productivity measurements (Vol. 6, pp. 41–66). Victoria: Trafford Publishing.
  • Drenkovska, M., & Redek, T. (2015). Intangible capital, innovation and export-led growth: Empirical comparative study of Slovenia and the Western Balkans. Economic and Business Review for Central and South-Eastern Europe, 17(1), 25.
  • Duranton, G., & Puga, D. (2001). Nursery cities: Urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1454–1477. doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1454
  • European Union. (2017). ‘Smart specialisation for European regions’. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.fi/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=european+union+smart+specialisation+for+european+regions&btnG=
  • Feenstra, R. C., & Kee, H. L. (2007). Trade liberalisation and export variety: A comparison of Mexico and China. The World Economy, 30(1), 5–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00869.x
  • Feenstra, R. C., Madani, D., Yang, T. H., & Liang, C. Y.(1999). Testing endogenous growth in South Korea and Taiwan. Journal of Development Economics, 60(2), 317–341. doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00054-1
  • Feenstra, R. C., & Rose, A. K. (2000). Putting things in order: Trade dynamics and product cycles. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), 369–382. doi:10.1162/003465300558876
  • Feldman, M. P., & Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(2), 210–229. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01735.x
  • Frensch, R., & Wittich, V. G. (2009). Product variety and technical change. Journal of Development Economics, 88(2), 242–257. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.04.003
  • Fritsch, M. (2000). Interregional differences in R&D activities—An empirical investigation. European Planning Studies, 8(4), 409–427. doi:10.1080/713666416
  • Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2005). The role of regional knowledge sources for innovation: An empirical assessment (Vol. 15). Freiberg: Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg-Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
  • Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V. (2011). Determinants of the efficiency of regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, 45(7), 905–918. doi:10.1080/00343400802251494
  • Ganotakis, P., & Love, J. H. (2010). R&D, product innovation, and exporting: Evidence from UK new technology based firms. Oxford Economic Papers, 63(2), 279–306. doi:10.1093/oep/gpq027
  • Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126-1152.
  • Görzig, B., Piekkola, H., & Riley, R. (2010). Production of own account intangible investment: Methodology in innodrive project innodrive. University of Vaasa. Working paper No 1.
  • Gourlay, A. R., & Seaton, J. S. (2004). UK export behaviour at the firm level. Economic Issues, 9(2), 3–20.
  • Handbook, U. N. (1999). Handbook of input–output table compilation and analysis’, Studies in methods series F. New York, NY: United Nations.
  • Harris, R., & Li, Q. C. (2008). Exporting, R&D, and absorptive capacity in UK establishments. Oxford Economic Papers, 61(1), 74–103. doi:10.1093/oep/gpn011
  • Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Stephen, R. Y. (2004). ‘Exports versus FDI with heterogenous firms, American economic review 94ʹ. American Economic Society.
  • Henderson, V., Kuncoro, A., & Turner, M. (1995). Industrial development in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 103(5), 1067–1090. doi:10.1086/262013
  • Hyytinen, A., & Maliranta, M. (2013). Firm lifecycles and evolution of industry productivity. Research Policy, 42(5), 1080–1098. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.008
  • Jacobs, J. (1969). Strategies for helping cities. American Economics Review, 59(4), 652–656.
  • Kaldor, N. (1966). Marginal productivity and the macro-economic theories of distribution: Comment on Samuelson and Modigliani. Review of Economic Studies, 33(4), 309-319.
  • Lachenmaier, S., & Wößmann, L. (2006). Does innovation cause exports? Evidence from exogenous innovation impulses and obstacles using German micro data. Oxford Economic Papers, 58(2), 317–350. doi:10.1093/oep/gpi043
  • Laursen, K. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Business Review, 5(1), 99–115. doi:10.1007/s40821-015-0017-1
  • Lee, J. (2011). Export specialization and economic growth around the world. Economic Systems, 35(1), 45–63. doi:10.1016/j.ecosys.2010.11.002
  • Lodefalk, M. (2014). The role of services for manufacturing firm exports. Review of World Economics, 150(1), 59–82. doi:10.1007/s10290-013-0171-4
  • McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2015). Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1291–1302. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
  • Musolesi, A., & Huiban, J.-P. (2010). Innovation and productivity in knowledge intensive business services. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(1), 63–81. doi:10.1007/s11123-009-0163-5
  • Nadim, A. (2017), ‘Trade in value added and beyond: Developing integrated international economic accounts’, The joint Eurostat – DG RTD satellite event on “Challenges in measuring productivity, growth and intangibles” of the Eurostat biannual conference “New Techniques and Technologies for Official Statistics – Increasing Data Relevance for All” (13 – 17 March 2017), OECD.
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M, & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265.
  • OECD. (2013). ‘Measuring knowledge-based capital’, supporting investment in knowledge capital, growth and innovation. Paris: Author.
  • Piekkola, H., ed. (2011), Intangible capital - Driver of growth in Europe. Proceedings of the University of Vaasa. Reports 167; Vaasa).
  • Piekkola, H. (2016). Intangible investment and market valuation. Review of Income and Wealth, 62(1), 28–51. doi:10.1111/roiw.2016.62.issue-1
  • Piekkola, H. (2018). Broad-based intangibles as generators of growth in Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 27(4), 377–400.
  • Piekkola, H., & Åkerholm, J. (2013). ‘Talouden kasvun veturit – Osaamiseen ja aineettomiin investointeihin vaikuttavat tekijät ‘. Kansantaloudellinen aikakauskirja, 109(4), 429–442.
  • Radzi, M. S. N. M., Junoh, A. S., Hussain, N. S. N., Aziz, Z. A., & Zawawi, N. F. M. (2015). The effect of information, communication and technology (ICT) and quality management to export performance of Malaysian’s SME in manufacturing sector. Journal of Scientific Research and Development 2(14), 146–157.
  • Rodríguez, J. L., & Rodríguez, R. M. G. (2005). Technology and export behaviour: A resource-based view approach. International Business Review, 14(5), 539–557. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.07.002
  • Squicciarini, M., & Le Mouel, M. (2012), ‘Defining and measuring investment in organisational capital using US microdata to develop a task-based approach’, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers (Paris).
  • Van Ark, B., Hao, J. X., Corrado, C., & Hulten, C. (2009). Measuring intangible capital and its contribution to economic growth in Europe. EIB Papers, 14(1), 62–93.
  • Van Beveren, I., & Vandenbussche, H. (2010). Product and process innovation and firms’ decision to export. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 13(1), 3–24. doi:10.1080/17487870903546267
  • Wagner, J. (2006). Export intensity and plant characteristics: What can we learn from quantile regression? Review of World Economics, 142(1), 195–203. doi:10.1007/s10290-006-0063-y
  • Wagner, J. (2012). ‘International trade and firm performance: A survey of empirical studies since 2006ʹ. Review of World Economics, 148(2), 235–267. doi:10.1007/s10290-011-0116-8