The role of reference-dependent preferences in the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: Evidence from Korea

References

• An, L., Wang, H., Wang, J., & Yu, J. (2017). Lottery-related anomalies: The role of reference-dependent preferences. PBCSF-NIFR Research Paper No. 15-04. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2636610.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, A., Hodrick, R., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2006). The cross-section of volatility and expected returns. Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00836.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2009). High idiosyncratic volatility and low returns: International and further u.S. Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bali, T. G., Cakici, N., & Whitelaw, R. F. (2011). Maxing out: Stocks as lotteries and the cross-section of expected returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(2), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberis, N., & Huang, M. (2008). Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. American Economic Review, 98(5), 2066–2100. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.5.2066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberis, N., & Xiong, W. (2009). What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. Journal of Finance, 64(2), 751–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberis, N. C. (2013). Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.1.173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, B., Mitton, T., & Vorkink, K. (2010). Expected idiosyncratic skewness. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 169–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart, M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chichernea, D. C., Kassa, H., & Slezak, S. L. (2019). Lottery preferences and the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle. European Financial Management, 25(3), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E., & French, K. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 607–636. https://doi.org/10.1086/260061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazzini, A. (2006). The disposition effect and underreaction to news. Journal of Finance, 61(4), 2017–2046. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00896.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, F. (2009). Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinblatt, M., & Han, B. (2005). Prospect theory, mental accounting, and momentum. Journal of Financial Economics, 78(2), 311–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. (1988). Predicting contemporary volume with historic volume at differential price levels: Evidence supporting the disposition effect: Discussion. Journal of Finance, 43(3), 698–699. DOI: 10.2307/2328192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, V. (2012). Prospect theory, liquidation, and the disposition effect. Management Science, 58(2), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hens, T., & Vlcek, M. (2011). Does prospect theory explain the disposition effect? Journal of Behavioral Finance, 12(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2011.601976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W., Liu, Q., Rhee, S. G., & Zhang, L. (2010). Return reversals, idiosyncratic risk, and expected returns. Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, J., Pritamani, M., & Sharma, V. (2010). Momentum and the disposition effect: The role of individual investors. Financial Management, 39(3), 1155–1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, J. E., & Jin, L. J. (2013). Realization utility with reference-dependent preferences. The Review of Financial Studies, 64(3), 723–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhs116
   Google Scholar
• Kaustia, M. (2010). Prospect theory and the disposition effect. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(3), 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109010000244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakonishok, J., & Smidt, S. (1986). Volume for winners and losers: Taxation and other motives for stock trading. Journal of Finance, 41(4), 951–974. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04559.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 42(3), 483–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nartea, G., Wu, J., & Liu, H. T. (2014). Extreme returns in emerging stock markets: Evidence of a max effect in south korea. Applied Financial Economics, 24(6), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2014.884696
   Google Scholar
• Newey, W., & West, K. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708. DOI: 10.2307/1913610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775–1798. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. R., & Smedema, A. R. (2011). The return impact of realized and expected idiosyncratic volatility. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(10), 2547–2558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontiff, J. (2006). Costly arbitrage and the myth of idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1–2), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. David K. Levine. Levine's Working Paper Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Yan, J., & Yu, J. (2017). Reference-dependent preferences and the risk–return trade-off. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(2), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar