1,561
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
FINANCIAL ECONOMICS

Modelling the downside risk potential of mutual fund returns

ORCID Icon
Article: 2015084 | Received 10 May 2021, Accepted 27 Nov 2021, Published online: 28 Jan 2022

References

  • Abad, P., Benito, S., & López, C. (2014). A comprehensive review of value at risk methodologies. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics, 12(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srfe.2013.06.001
  • Abad, P., & Benito, S. (2013). A detailed comparison of value at risk in international stock exchanges. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 94, 258–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2012.05.011
  • Aloui, C., Abaoub, E., & Bellalah, M. (2005). Long range dependence on Tunisian stock market volatility. International Journal of Business, 10 (4), 1–26. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper
  • Angelidis, T., Benos, A., & Degiannakis, S. A. (2007). A robust VaR model under different time periods and weighting schemes. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-006-0010-y
  • Ashley, R., & Randal, V. (2009). Frequency dependence in regression model coefficients: An alternative approach for modeling nonlinear dynamic relationships in time series. Econometric Reviews, 28(1–3), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930802387753
  • Bali, T., & Theodossiou, P. (2007). A conditional-SGT-VaR approach with alternative GARCH models. Annals of Operations Research, 151(1), 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0118-4
  • Bawa, V. S. (1975). Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects. Journal of Financial Economics, 2(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(75)90025-2
  • Billio, M., & Pelizzon, L. (2000). Value-at-risk: A multivariate switching regime approach. Journal of Empirical Finance, 7(5), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5398(00)00022-0
  • Black, F. (1976). Studies of stock price volatility changes. In: Proceedings of the 1976 Meeting of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, American Statistical Association Washington, D.C., pp. 171–181.
  • Bollerslev, T., Chou, R. Y., & Kroner, K. P. (1992). ARCH modeling in finance: A review of the theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Econometrics, 52 (1–2), 5–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90064-X.
  • Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
  • Bollerslev, T. (1987). A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), 542–547. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925546
  • Boudoukh, J., Richardson, M., & Whitelaw, R. F. (1997). The best of both worlds: A hybrid approach to calculating value at risk. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.51420
  • Christoffersen, P. (1998). Evaluating interval forecasting. International Economic Review, 39(4), 841–862. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527341
  • Curto, J. D., Pinto, J., & Tavares, G. (2009). Modeling stock markets volatility using GARCH models with Normal, Student-t and stable Paretian distributions. Statistical Papers, 50(2), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-007-0080-5
  • Danielsson, & De Vries. (2000). Value-at-risk and extreme returns. Annales d’Économie et de Statistique, 60(60), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/20076262
  • DeGennaro, R. P., & Richard, B. (1990). Stock returns and volatility. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 25 (2), 203–214. https://ssrn.com/371920
  • Ding, Z., Granger, C. W., & Engle, R. F. (1993). A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-5398(93)90006-D
  • Dowd, K. (2005). Measuring Market Risk (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Emenogu, N. G., Adenomon, M. O., & Nweze, N. O. (2020). On the volatility of daily stock returns of total Nigeria Plc: Evidence from GARCH models, value-at- risk and backtesting. Financial Innovation, 6(18). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-020-00178-1
  • Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50 (4), 987–1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773 JSTOR 1912773
  • Fama, E. (1965). The behaviour of stock-market prices The. Journal of Business, 38 (1), 34–105. https://doi.org/10.1086/294743.
  • Feunou, B., Mohammad, R. J.-P., & Tedongap, R. (2013). Modeling market downside volatility. Review of Finance, 17(1), 443–481. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfr024
  • Goorbergh, R. V., & Vlaar, P. J. (1999). DNB Staff Reports (discontinued) (Netherlands Central Bank). https://www.dnb.nl/binaries/sr040_tcm46-146818.pdf
  • Grzegorz, M. (2013). Parametric or Non-parametric estimation of value-at-risk. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n11p103
  • Guha Deb, S. (2017). A VaR-based downside risk analysis of Indian Equity mutual funds in the pre and post-global financial crisis periods. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 18(2), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972652719846348
  • Hansen, P. R., & Lunde, A. (2005). A forecast comparison of volatility models: Does anything beat a GARCH(1,1). Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(7), 873–889. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.800
  • Herzberg, M., & Sibbertsen, P. (2004). Pricing of options under different volatility models. Technical Report/ Universit¨at Dortmund, SFB 475, Komplexit¨atsreduktion in Multivariaten Datenstrukturen, 62. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/22575/1/tr62-04.pdf
  • Jean, W. H. (1975). Comparison of moment and stochastic dominance ranking methods. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 10(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330323
  • Jorion, P. (2007). Value at risk: The new benchmark to measure financial risk (3rd ed.). McGraw- Hill.
  • Kaplan, P. D., & Knowles, J. A. (2004). Kappa: A generalized downside risk-adjusted performance measure [Working Paper]. Miscellaneous publication, Morningstar Associates and York Hedge Fund Strategies.
  • Keating, C., & Shadwick, W. F. (2002). A universal performance measure. Journal of Performance Measurement, 6(3), 59–84. https://www.actuaries.org.uk/system/files/documents/pdf/keating.pdf
  • Kheir, I. (2019). GARCH modeling of value at risk and expected shortfall using bayesian model averaging (CUNY Academic Works, City University of New York).https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/510
  • Korkmaz, T., & Aydın, K. (2002). Using EWMA and GARCH methods in VaR calculations: Application of ISE-30 Index. The International Conference in Economics, Ankara, Turkey. https://content.csbs.utah.edu/~ehrbar/erc2002/pdf/P161.pdf
  • Kupiec, P. (1995). Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. The Journal of Derivatives, 3(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1995.407942
  • Lee, C.-F., & Su, J.-B. (2015). Value-at-Risk estimation via a semi-parametric approach: Evidence from the stock markets. In C.-F. Lee & J. Lee (Eds.), Handbook of Financial Econometrics and Statistics (pp. 1399–1429). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7750-1_51
  • Lee, T. H., & Saltoglu, B. (2002). Assessing the risk forecasts for Japanese stock market. Japan and the World Economy, 14 (1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0922-1425(01)00080-9.
  • Lin, C., & Shen, S. (2006). Can the student-t distribution provide accurate value at risk? The Journal of Risk Finance, 7(3), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/15265940610664960
  • Liu, H.-C., & Hung, J.-C. (2010). Forecasting volatility and capturing downside risk of the Taiwanese futures markets under the financial tsunami. Managerial Finance, 36(10), 860–875. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351011070233
  • Lopez, J. A. (1999). Methods for evaluating value-at-risk estimates. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Review, 2, 3–17. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/research_papers/9802.pdf
  • Mandelbrot, B. (1963). The Variation of certain speculative prices. The Journal of Business, 36 (4), 394. https://doi.org/10.1086/294632.
  • Markowitz, H. (1959). Portfolio Selection Efficient Diversification of Investment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Mills, T. (1965). Modelling skewness and kurtosis in the London stock exchange FT-SE index return distributions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician), 44(3), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.2307/2348703
  • Morgan Bank, J. P. (1996). Risk metrics—Technical document (4th ed.).
  • Raza, H., Arshad, H., & Rashid, A. (2019). The impact of downside risk on expected return:evidence from emerging economies. The Lahore Journal of Business, 8(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.35536/ljb.2019.v8.i1.a5
  • Roy, A. D. (1952). Safety First and the Holding of Assets. Econometrica, 20(3), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907413
  • Sinha, T., & Chamu, F. (2000). Comparing different methods of calculating value-at-risk. SSRN: Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.706582
  • Skrinjaric, T. (2014). Investment strategy on the Zagreb stock exchange based on Dynamic DEA. Croatian Economic Survey, 16(1), 129–160. https://doi.org/10.15179/ces.16.1.5
  • Sortino, F. A., & Van der Meer, R. (1991). Downside risk. Journal of Portfolio Management, 17(4), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1991.409343
  • Su, J.-B., & Hung, J.-C. (2018). The value-at-risk estimate of stock and currency-stock portfolios’ returns. MDPI-Risk, 6(133). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6040133>
  • Tusji, C. (2016). Does the fear gauge predict downside risk more accurately than econometric models? Evidence from the US stock market. Cogent Economics & Finance, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2016.1220711
  • Watanabe, Y. (2007). Is Sharpe ratio still effective? The Journal of Performance Measurement, 11(1), 55–66. https://spauldinggrp.com/product/sharpe-ratio-still-effective/
  • Zoran, J., & Ivica, T. (2014). Empirical estimation and comparison of normal and student-t linear VaR on the Belgrade stock exchange. SINTEZA 2014: The use of the internet and development perspectives (Singidunum University , Belgrade) (pp. 298–302). https://doi.org/10.15308/sinteza-2014-298-302