2,114
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
GENERAL & APPLIED ECONOMICS

Politically connected independent board and firm performance

, , & ORCID Icon
Article: 2069638 | Received 09 Jul 2021, Accepted 11 Apr 2022, Published online: 01 May 2022

References

  • Abidin, Z. Z., Kamal, N. M., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Board structure and corporate performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 1(1), 150–19. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v1n1p150
  • Agrawal, A., & Konoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? Journal of Law and Economics, XLIV(April), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1086/320271
  • Ang, J. S., Ding, D. K., & Thong, T. Y. (2013). Political connection and firm value. Asian Development Review, 30(2), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1162/ADEV_a_00018
  • Basyith, A., Fauzi, F., & Idris, M. (2015). The impact of board structure and ownership structure on firm performance: An evidence from blue chip firms listed in Indonesian stock exchange. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(3), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i4c3p2
  • Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006
  • Cao, J., Pan, X., Qian, M., Tian, G. G. (2017). Political capital and CEO entrenchment: evidence from CEO turnover in Chinese non-SOEs. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.003
  • Chen, S., Sun, Z., Tang, S., & Wu, D. (2011). Government intervention and investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.08.004
  • Chi, H.-Y., Weng, T.-C., Liao, C.-H., & Huang, H.-Y. (2017). Political Connection and Firm Performance. Department of Accounting, National Chung Hsing University. NTU Management Review. College of Management Press. https://doi.org/10.6226/NTUMR.2017.JUL.R.13016
  • Cordeiro, J. J., He, L., Conyon, M., & Shaw, T. S. (2013). Informativeness of performance measures and Chinese executive compensation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4), 1031–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-013-9353-9
  • Dwaikat, N., Qubbaj, I. S., Queiri, A., & Seetharam, Y. (2021). Gender diversity on the board of directors and its impact on the Palestinian financial performance of the firm. Cogent Economics and Finance, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1948659
  • Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704
  • Fan, J. P. H., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2014). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and the post‐IPO performance of China’s partially privatized firms. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 26(3), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12084
  • Firth, M., Fung, P. M. Y., & Rui, O. M. (2007). Ownership, two-tier board structure, and the informativeness of earnings – Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(4), 463–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.05.004
  • Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.1095
  • Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Rodríguez-Dominguez, L. (2010). The influence of gender diversity on corporate performance. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 13(1), 53–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-4891(10)70012-1
  • Gati, V., Nasih, M., Agustia, D., & Harymawan, I. (2020). Islamic index, independent commissioner and firm performance. Cogent Business & Management. 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1824440
  • Ha, P. V., Frömmel, M., & Ntim, C. G. (2020). Political connection heterogeneity and firm value in Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1738202. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1738202
  • Habib, A., & Muhammadi, A. H. (2018). Political connections and audit report lag: Indonesian evidence. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 26(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-08-2016-0086
  • Han, J., Zhang, G., & Smith, T. (2018). Politically connected boards, value or cost: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Accounting and Finance, 58(1), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12215
  • Harymawan, I. (2018). Why do firms appoint former military personnel as directors? Evidence of loan interest rate in militarily connected firms in Indonesia. Asian Review of Accounting, 26(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-07-2016-0086
  • Harymawan, I., & Nowland, J. (2016). Political connections and earnings quality: How do connected firms respond to changes in political stability and government effectiveness? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 24(4), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2016-0056
  • Hu, R., Karim, K., Lin, K. J., & Tan, J. (2020). Do investors want politically connected independent directors? Evidence from their forced resignations in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.11.004
  • Iswati, S. (2007). Memprediksi Kinerja Keuangan dengan Modal Intelektual pada Perusahaan Perbankan Terbuka di Bursa Efek Jakarta. Ekuitas, 11(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2007.v11.i2.313
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  • Kang, J., & Zhang, L. (2018). Do outside directors with government experience create value? Financial Management, 47(2), 209–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12190
  • Kim, C., & Zhang, L. (2016). Corporate political connections and tax aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), 78–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12150
  • Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2004). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of corporate Finance 10 5 703–728 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00046-4
  • Kong, D., Xiang, J., Zhang, J., & Lu, Y. (2019). Politically connected independent directors and corporate fraud in China. Accounting & Finance, 58(5), 1347–1383. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12449
  • Lei, C. (2018). Estimating the value of political connections in China: Evidence from sudden deaths of politically connected independent directors. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46(2), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2017.10.001
  • Lukas, S., & Basuki, B. (2015). The implementation of good corporate and its impact on the financial performance of banking industry listed in IDX. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 23 (1), 47–72. https://ijabs.ub.ac.id/index.php/ijabs/article/view/266/188
  • Maaloul, A., Chakroun, R., & Yahyaoui, S. (2018). The effect of political connections on companies’ performance and value: Evidence from Tunisian companies after the revolution. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-12-2016-0105
  • Margaretha, F., & Afriyanti, E. (2016). Pengaruh corporate governance Terhadap Kinerja Industri Jasa Non Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Universitas Tarumanagara Journal of Accounting, 20 (3), 453–466. https://www.neliti.com/publications/77378/pengaruh-corporate-governance-terhadap-kinerja-industri-jasa-non-keuangan-yang-t
  • Memon, F., Bhutto, N. A., & Abbas, G. (2012). Capital Structure and firm performance : A case of textile sector of Pakistan. Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 1(9), 9–15.
  • Mishra, S. (2020). Do independent directors improve firm performance? Evidence from India. Global Business Review. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920917310
  • Nawawi, A. H. T., Agustia, D., Lusnadi, G. M., & Fauzi, H. (2020). DISCLOSURE OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORT MEDIATING GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MECHANISM ON STOCK PERFORMANCE. Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 9, 151–170. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2020.9.J(12)
  • Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., & Markóczy, L. (2015). Human capital and CEO compensation during institutional transitions. Journal of Management Studies, 52(1), 117–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12106
  • Pranoto, B. A., & Widagdo, A. K. (2016). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik dan corporate governance Terhadap tax aggressiveness. Syariah Paper Accounting FEB UMS, 1 (3), 472–486. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fpublikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id%2Fbitstream%2Fhandle%2F11617%2F7310%2F44%2520-%2520Bayu%2520Agung%2520Pranoto.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1%26isAllowed%3Dy&clen=934504
  • Rahman, Z., Goyal, P., & Kazmi, A. A. (2013). Corporate sustainability performance and firm performance research: Literature review and future research agenda. Management Decision, 51(2), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311301867
  • Reguera-Alvarado, N., & Bravo, F. (2017). The effect of independent directors’ characteristics on firm performance: Tenure and multiple directorships. Research in International Business and Finance, 41, 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.045
  • Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., & Clark, E. (2016). Do political connections affect firm performance? Evidence from a developing country. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(8), 1876–1891. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1041845
  • Samara, G., & Berbegal-Mirabent, J. (2018). Independent directors and family firm performance: Does one size fit all? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0455-6
  • Shin, J. Y., Hyun, J., Oh, S., & Yang, H. (2018). The effects of politically connected outside directors on firm performance: Evidence from Korean chaebol firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 26(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12203
  • Tanjung, M. (2020). A cross-firm analysis of corporate governance compliance and performance in Indonesia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(5), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-06-2019-2328
  • Utomo, M. N., Wahyudi, S., Muharam, H., & Sianturi, J. A. T. P. (2018). Commissioner board monitoring to create firm performance through environmentally friendly management. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 9(3), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.9.3(27).26
  • Wang, Y., Yao, C., & Kang, D. (2018). Political connections and firm performance: Evidence from government officials’ site visits. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.05.003
  • Wati, L. N. (2017). Board of commissioner’s effectiveness on politically connected conglomerates: Evidence from Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25 (November), 255–270. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85047479603&partnerID=40&md5=ecbd9a810e21b0ea5101fdd010288314
  • Wei, W., & Muratova, Y. (2020). Executive power and politically connected independent directors: Evidence from China. Asian Business & Management, 21, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00104-4
  • Wong, W.-Y., & Hooy, C.-W. (2018). Do types of political connection affect firm performance differently? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 51, 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.08.009
  • Wu, H., Li, S., Ying, S. X., & Chen, X. (2018). Politically connected CEOs, firm performance, and CEO pay. Journal of Business Research, 91, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.003
  • Yanyu, C., Wenzhe, Z., & Yimiao, H. (2020). Are independent directors’ political connections valuable? Findings based on a natural experiment in China. Nankai Business Review International, 11(2), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-05-2018-0034
  • Zhang, H., Li, W., & Jian, M. (2012). How does state ownership affect tax avoidance? Evidence from China. Singapore Management University, School of Accountancy, 13–18.