The nature of inconsistencies in two measures of risk preferences in a sample of young African South Africans

References

• Anderson, L., & Mellor, J. (2009). Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39(2), 137–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-009-9075-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, J., O’Dea, C., & Oldfield, Z. (2011). Cognitive function, numeracy and retirement saving trajectories. Econ J (London), 120(548), 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, J., & Loomes, G. (1997). The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007721327452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellante, D., & Link, A. N. (1981). Are public sector workers more risk averse than private sector workers. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 34(3), 408–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398103400307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Garino, G., & Taylor, K. (2013). Household debt and attitudes towards risk. Review of Income and Wealth, 59(2), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2012.00506.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, D. M. (2009). Changing the probability versus changing the reward. Experimental Economics, 12(4), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-009-9219-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvet, L. E., & Sodini, P. (2014). Twin peaks: Disentangling the determinants of risk taking in household portfolios. Journal of Finance, 69(2), 869–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effect of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1), 7–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007850605129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, G., & Viceisza, A. (2016). Three risk elicitation methods in the field: Evidence from rural Senegal. Review of Behavioral Economics, 3(2), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 41(1), 20–33. https://journal.sjdm.org/81125/jdm81125.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Schult, E., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The berlin numeracy test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/t45862-000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, J. S., Hartog, J., Jonker, N., & Van Praag, C. M. (2002). Low risk aversion encourages the choice for entrepreneurship: An empirical test of truism. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 48(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00222-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, G. R., Harrison, G. W., & Rutstrom, E. E. (1995). Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: Is the dichotomous choice approach incentive-compatible. American Economic Review, 85(1), 260–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave, C., Eckel, C. C., Johnson, C. A., & Rajas, C. (2010). Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41(3), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-010-9103-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, A. R., & Jaccard, J. J. (1979). Variables that moderate the attitude-behaviour relation. results of a longitudinal survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1364–1376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deck, C., Lee, J., Reyes, J., & Rosen, C. (2013). A failed attempt to explain within subject variation in risk taking behavior using domain specific risk attitudes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 87(C), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, J., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: measurement, determinants and behavioural consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmen, T., & Falk, A. (2011). Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences and gender. The American Economic Review, 10(2), 556–590. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.2.556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2018). . On the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Risk Preference. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.2.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmen, T., Adema, J., Huffman, D., & Nikolka, T. (2022). On the stability of risk preferences: Measurement matters. Economic Letters, 210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110172
   Google Scholar
• Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2002). Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes towards financial risk. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 23(4), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00097-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2008). Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1(113), 1061–1073. piotr-eudokimov.com/gender2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J. X., & Xiaio, J. J. (2006). Cross cultural differences in risk tolerance: A comparison between Chinese and americans. Journal of Personal Finance, 5 (3) , 54–75 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27472830_Cross-Cultural-differences_in_consumer_decision_making_styles.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M. J., Bargh, J. A., & Nayak, D. A. (2005). How automatic evaluations influence the interpretation of subsequent unrelated stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(182–191), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippin, A., & Crosetto, P. (2016). A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes. Management Science, 62(11), 3138–3160. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourage, D., Krieckel, B., & Dohmen, T. (2014). Occupational sorting of school graduates. The role of economic preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1-61, 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, D., & Shtudiner, Z. (2016). Can Financial Education Extend the Border of Bounded Rationality?. Modern Economy, 7(02), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2016.72012
   Google Scholar
• Guiso, L., Japelli, T., & Pistaferri, L. (2002). An empirical analysis of earnings and employment risk. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 20(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102317351985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. W., & Rutstrom, E. C. (2008). Chapter 81. In P. Charles, S. Vernon (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, 1st ed., 752–767. Elsevier. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePec:eee:expchp:5-81
   Google Scholar
• He, P., Veronesi, M., & Engel, S. (2017). Consistency of risk preference measures and the role of ambiguity: An artefactual field experiment from rural china. The Journal of Development Studies, 54(11), 1955–1973. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1336542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey, J. D., Morone, A., & Schmidt, U. (2009). Noise and bias in eliciting preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39(3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-009-9081-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karni, E. (1982). Risk aversion and saving behavior: Summary and extension. International Economic Review, 23(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behaviour: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295211007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhberger, A., Schulte-Mecklenbech, M., & Perner, J. (2002). Framing decisions: Hypothetical and real. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(2), 1162–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00021-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E., & Huang, J. (2013). Risk preferences and pesticide use by cotton farmers in China. Journal of Development Economics, 103(c), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E. (2013). Time to change what to sow: Risk preferences and technology adoption decisions of cotton farmers in China. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(40), 1386–1403. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locey, M. L., Jones, B. A., & Rachlin, H. (2011). Real and hypothetical rewards. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(6), 552–564. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3348706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonnquist, J. E., Verkasalo, M., Walkowitz, G., & Wichardt, P. C. (2015). Measuring individual risk attitudes in the lab. task or ash? An empirical comparison. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 119(C), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudzingiri, C., & Koumba, U. (2021). eliciting risk preferences experimentally versus using a general risk question. Does financial literacy bridge the gap? Risks, 9(8), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9080140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagano, M., & Yeom, D. H. (2014). Another determinant of household leverage: Evidence from Japan’s mortgage loan data. International Review of Finance, 14(1), 105–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, H. R., Cummings, R. G., Ganderton, P. T., Harrison, G. W., & McGuckin, T. (1994). Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. Land Economics, 70(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. (2016). Not so strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Feminist Economics, 22(2), 114–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1057609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroni, A., Frey, R., Bruhin, A., Dutilh, G., Hertwig, R., & Rieskomp, J. (2017). The risk elicitation puzzle. Nature, Human Behavior, 1(11), 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0219-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin, N. A., Roberts, G. A., & Schoer, V. (2014). A Guide to the South African Labour Market Entry Survey. https://www.ekon.sun.ac.za/nrankin
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, V., Van der Berg, S., Van Rensberg, D. J., & Taylor, S. (2012). Educational outcomes: Pathways and performance in South African high schools. South African Journal of Science, 108(3/4), Art #620. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v108i3/4.620
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., Han, P. K. J., Dieckman, N. F., & Nelson, W. (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135(60), 943–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynaud, A., & Conture, S. (2012). Stability and risk preference measures: Results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and Decision, 73(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9296-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtudiner, Z. (2018). Risk tolerance, time preferences and financial decision making: Differences between self-employed people and empoyees. Modern Economy, 9(12), 2150–2163. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2018.912133
   Google Scholar
• Skriabikova, O., Dohmen, T., & Krieckel, B. (2014). New evidence on the relationship between risk attitudes and self employment. Labour Economics, 30(C), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobkow, A., Zaleskiewicz, T., Petrova, P., Garcia-Retamero, R., & Traczyk, J. (2020). Worry, risk perception and controllability predict intentions towards covid-19 preventative behaviours. Frontiers in Psychology-Personality and Social Psychology, 11(November), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stangor, C., Jhangiani, R., & Tarry, H. (2022). Principles of social psychology-1st international H5P edition. BCC Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Vieder, F. M., Beyene, A. D., Bluffstone, R., Dissanyache, S. T., & Gebreegziabher, Z. (2015). Measuring risk preferences in rural Ethiopia: Risk tolerance and exogenous income proxies. Portland State University, PPX Scholar, Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, R., Hanna, S., & Lindamood, S. (2004). Changes in financial risk tolerance, 1983-2001. Financial Services Review, 13(4), 249–266. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740157
   Google Scholar