Determinants of going-concern audit opinions: evidence from Vietnam stock exchange-listed companies

References

• Achyarsyah, P. (2016). The analysis of the influence of financial distress, debt default, company size, and leverage on going concern opinion. IJABER, 14(10), 6767–13. http://repository.unas.ac.id/62/1/7.%20Padri%20Achyarsyah.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminate analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.2307/2978933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaver, W. H. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 4, 71–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellovary, J., Giacomino, D., & Akers, M. (2007, July). A review of bankruptcy prediction studies: 1930 to present. Journal of Financial Education, 33, 1–42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41948574
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, N. R., Eshleman, J. D., & Guo, P. (2018). Auditor size and going concern reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75(4), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.4.453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, E., Fargher, N., Geiger, M. A., Lennox, C., Raghunandan, K., & Willekens, M. (2013). Audit reporting for going-concern uncertainty: A research synthesis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Suppl. 1), 353–384. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50324
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J., Kim, C., Kim, J., & Zang, Y. (2010). Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craswell, A. T., Francis, J., & Taylor, S. (1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(95)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)
   Google Scholar
• Farinha, J., & Viana, L. F. (2009). Board structure and modified audit opinions: Evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange. International Journal of Auditing, 13(3), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00394.x
   Google Scholar
• Feng, M., & Li, C. (2014). Are auditors professionally skeptical? Evidence from auditors’ going-concern opinions and management earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(5), 1061–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, M., Fung, P. M. Y., & Rui, O. M. (2007). Ownership, two-tier board structure, and the informativeness of earnings: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(4), 463–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Yu, D. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521–1552. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallizo, J., & Saladrigues, R. (2016). An analysis of determinants of going concern audit opinion: Evidence from Spain stock exchange. Intangible Capital, 12(1), 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Blandón, J., & Argilés Bosch, J. M. (2013). Audit tenure and audit qualifications in a low litigation risk setting: An analysis of the Spanish market. Estudios de Economía, 40(2), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-52862013000200002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M., & Raghunandan, K. (2002). Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. (2005). Recent changes in the association between bankruptcies and prior audit opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2005.24.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, A., Geiger, M., & Wallage, P. (2019). A synthesis of research on auditor reporting on going-concern uncertainty: An update and extension (Project No. 2017A01). Foundation for Auditing Research. https://foundationforauditingresearch.org/files/papers/a-synthesis-of-research-on-auditor-reporting-on-going-concern-uncertainty.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. J. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th) ed.). Pearson International Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, G., Griffiths, W., Hill, R., & Lee, T. (1980). The theory and practice of econometrics. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, T. T. T., Tran, M. D., Hoang, V. T., & Nguyen, T. H. L. (2020). Determinants influencing audit delay: The case of Vietnam. Accounting, 6(5), 851–858. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.5.009
   Google Scholar
• Mazaba, I., Lotter, W., & Thurner, T. (2013). Looking into the expectation gap—what are going-concern assumptions really about? Corporate Ownership & Control, 2(4), 714–720. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i2c4art6
   Google Scholar
• Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2017). Auditing and assurance services: A systematic approach (10th) ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mutchler, J. F. (1985). A multivariate analysis of the auditor’s going-concern opinion decision. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(2), 668–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutchler, J. F., Hopwood, W., & McKeown, J. M. (1997). The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omer, W. K. H., Aljaaidi, K. S., Md Yusof, M., & Selamat, M. H. (2020). The associations of board of directors’ characteristics with modified audit opinion. AD-minister, 37(37), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.17230/ad-minister.37.1
   Google Scholar
• Platt, H. D., & Platt, M. B. (2002). Predicting corporate financial distress: Reflections on choice-based sample bias. Journal of Economics and Finance, 26(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02755985
   Google Scholar
• Rahma, F., & Sukirman, S. (2018). The determinants that affect the acceptance of going concern audit opinion with auditor reputation as moderating variable. Accounting Analysis Journal, 7(2), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v7i2.21267
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. K., & Francis, J. R. (2000). Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S., Randolph, W., Jaffe, J., & Jordan, B. (2019). Corporate finance (12th) ed.). McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, T. G., & Roh, C. (2007). The auditor’s going-concern opinion decision. International Journal of Business and Economics, 6(2), 89–101. http://www.ijbe.org/table%20of%20content/pdf/vol6-2/vol6-2-01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Simamora, R. A., & Hendarjatno, H. (2019). The effects of audit client tenure, audit lag, opinion shopping, liquidity ratio, and leverage to the going concern audit opinion. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-05-2019-0038
   Google Scholar
• Subramanyam, K. R. (2014). Financial statement analysis (11th) ed.). McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Suroto, L., & Kusuma, H. (2017). Drivers of going concern audit opinions: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Holistica, 8(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/hjbpa-2017-0015
   Google Scholar
• Zdolsek, D., Jagric, T., & Kolar, I. (2021). Auditor’s going-concern opinion prediction: The case of Slovenia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 34(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1888766
   Google Scholar
• Zdolsek, D., Jagric, T., & Odar, M. (2015). Identification of auditor’s report qualifications: An empirical analysis for Slovenia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 28(1), 999–1005. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1101960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar