A systematic literature review on performance of social enterprises

References

• Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., & Ahenkorah, E. (2020). Exploring financial performance and green logistics management practices: Examining the mediating influences of market, environmental and social performances. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsaid, Z. L., & Ambilichu, A. C. (2021). The influence of institutional pressures on the implementation of a performance measurement system in an Egyptian social enterprise. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 18(1), 53–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2020-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose-Oji, B., Lawrence, A., & Stewart, A. (2015). Community based forest enterprises in Britain: Two organising typologies. Forest Policy and Economics, 58, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjomshoae, A., Banomyong, R., Kunz, N., & Maghsoudi, A. (2021, July). A qualitative system dynamics model for humanitarian supply chain resilience. In 25th International Symposium on Logistics (ISL 2021): Building Resilience for Supply Chains. Nottingham University Business School, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Anjomshoae, A., Banomyong, R., Mohammed, F., & Kunz, N. (2022). A systematic review of humanitarian supply chains performance measurement literature from 2007 to 2021. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 72, 102852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Bengo, I. (2015). Performance measurement for social nterprises. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), 649–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9436-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmalovskij, A., Sadílek, T., Hinčica, V., & Mizerová, M. (2019). Performance of social enterprises in the Czech Republic. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1521865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacq, S., & Eddleston, K. A. (2018). A resource-based view of social entrepreneurship: How stewardship culture benefits scale of social impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, J., Cho, H. S., & Caplan, M. A. (2018). Network centrality and performance of SEs: Government certified SEs in Seoul, South Korea. Asian Social Work & Policy Review, 12(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bag, S., Luthra, S., Venkatesh, V. G., & Yadav, G. (2020). Towards understanding key enablers to green humanitarian supply chain management practices. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(5), 1111–1145. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-06-2019-0124
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.893615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BCSE. (2015). The british Columbia Centre for SE. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/employment-business-and-economic-development/economic-development/resources/webinars/2015-06-11
   Google Scholar
• Beisland, L. A., Djan, O. K., Mersland, R., & Randøy, T. (2021). Measuring social performance in SEs: A global study of microfinance institutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04417-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Mas-Machuca, M., & Guix, P. (2021). Impact of mission statement components on SEs’ performance. Review of Managerial Science, 15(3), 705–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00355-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattarai, C. R., Kwong, C. C., & Tasavori, M. (2019). Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and SE performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Research, 96, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S., & Jeong, M. (2021). Does Leadership matter in performance of social enterprises in South Korea? Sustainability, 13(20), 11109. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah, J., Amran, A., & Yahya, S. (2019a). External oriented resources and SEs’ performance the dominant mediating role of formal business planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheah, J., Amran, A., & Yahya, S. (2019b). Internal oriented resources and social enterprises’ performance: How can social enterprises help themselves before helping others? Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Kelly, T. F. (2015). B-Corps-A growing form of social enterprise: Tracing their progress and assessing their performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051814532529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. (2015). How partnerships affect the social performance of Korean social enterprises. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(3), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2014.965723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., & Kim, A. (2017). Relationships between entrepreneurship, community networking, and economic and social performance in SEs: Evidence from South Korea. Human Service Organizations, Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(4), 376–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2017.1279094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comway Dato-On, M. C., & Kalakay, J. (2016). The winding road of social entrepreneurship definitions: A SLR. SE Journal, 12(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-06-2015-0016
   Google Scholar
• Crucke, S., & Decramer, A. (2016). The development of a measurement instrument for the organizational performance of social enterprises. Sustainability, 8(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., & Van Aken, J. E. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29(3), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diomande, M. (1990). Business creation with minimal resources: Some lessons from the African experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(4), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90016-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Ses as hybrid organizations: A review and research genda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin, J., & Peric, M. (2017). Organising for community-based tourism: Comparing attitudes of local residents and local tourism entrepreneurs in Ravna Gora, Croatia. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 32(7), 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094217734811
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale & scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018). Social economy in the EU. Available at: accessed 4 October 2018 www.ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/socialeconomyon.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Bravo-Rodrigo, J., Pascual-Morena, C., Saz-Lara, A., Sequí-Dominguez, I., Álvarez-Bueno, C., & Cavero-Redondo, I. (2022). The safety and efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies for the preventive treatment of migraine: A protocol for multiple-treatment systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1753. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gali, N., Niemand, T., Shaw, E., Hughes, M., Kraus, S., & Brem, A. (2020). Social entrepreneurship orientation and company success: The mediating role of social performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerba, Y., & Viswanadham, P. (2016). Performance measurement of small scale enterprises: Review of theoretical and empirical literature. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(3), 531–535.
   Google Scholar
• Glaveli, N., & Geormas, K. (2018). Doing well and doing good: Exploring how strategic and market orientation impacts social enterprise performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(1), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2017-0132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, L., Miles, M. P., & Grimmer, M. (2016). The performance advantage of business planning for small and social retail enterprises in an economically disadvantaged region. European Journal of International Management, 10(4), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2016.077422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Thomasson, A. (2015). Bridging the accountability gap in hybrid organizations: The case of Copenhagen Malmö Port. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(3), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314548151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, F., Reilly, C., Moyes, D., & Whittam, G. (2018). From charity to social enterprise: The marketization of social care. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(3), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2016-0344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hlady-Rispal, M., & Servantie, V. (2018). Deconstructing the way in which value is created in the context of social entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. S. (2020). Towards an integrative definition of scaling social impact in SEs. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00164
   Google Scholar
• Jamaludin, M., Busthomi, H., Gantika, S., Rosid, A., Sunarya, E., & Nur, T. (2022). Market orientation and SCM strategy on SME organizational performances: The mediating effect of market performance. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2157117. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2157117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato, S. (2021). Social performance measurement adoption in nascent social enterprises: Refining the institutional model. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 15, e00244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00244
   Google Scholar
• Kerlin. (2013). Defining SE across different contexts: A conceptual framework based on institutional factors. Kerlin. Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., & Lee, J. (2018). The effect of network structure on performance in South Korea SMEs: The moderating effects of absorptive capacity. Sustainability, 10(9), 3174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, T. H., & Moon, M. J. (2017). Using social enterprises for social policy in South Korea: Do funding and management affect social and economic performance? Public Administration and Development, 37(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutoudis, P. (2018). Social enterprises and their impact on the society. Institute of Entrepreneurship Development, Larissa, Available online (accessed on 1 February 2021): https://ied.eu/project-updates/social-enterprises-and-their-impact/.
   Google Scholar
• Kroeger, A., & Weber, C. (2014). Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 513–540. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz, N. (2019). An automated quantitative content analysis process for humanitarian logistics research. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 9(3), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHLSCM-06-2018-0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R., & Fink, M. (2019). Rural social entrepreneurship: The role of social capital within and across institutional levels. Journal of Rural Studies, 70, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. K., & Chandra, Y. (2020). Dynamic and marketing capabilities as predictors of social enterprises’ performance. VOLUNTAS:. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(3), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00155-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G., Eng, T. Y., & Takeda, S. (2015). An investigation of marketing capabilities and social enterprise performance in the UK and Japan. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 267–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Kwong, C. C., Kim, A. Y., & Liu, H. (2021). The more the better vs. less is more: Strategic alliances, bricolage and social performance in social enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 137, 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majetić, F., Makarovič, M., Šimleša, D., & Golob, T. (2019). Performance of work integration social enterprises in Croatia, Slovenia, and Italian regions of Lombardy and Trentino. Economics & Sociology, 12(1), 286–368. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-1/17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamabolo, A., & Myres, K. (2020). Performance measurement in emerging market social enterprises using a balanced scorecard. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1561499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mersland, R., Nyarko, S. A., & Szafarz, A. (2019). Do social enterprises walk the talk? Assessing microfinance performances with mission statements. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 11, e00117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00117
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. P., Verreynne, M. L., & Luke, B. (2014). Social enterprises and the performance advantages of a Vincentian marketing orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(4), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2009-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. T., Nguyen, L. T., Nguyen, N. Q., & McMillan, D. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The case in Vietnam. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2075600. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2075600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A. (2009). ‘We do good things, don’t we?’: ‘blended value accounting’ in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 34(6–7), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., & Moher, D. (2017). Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and extensions: A scoping review. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic Reviews in the social Sciences. Blackwell. 978-1-4051-2110-1.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, P., Daniel, A., & Moreira, A. (2021). SE performance: The role of market and social entrepreneurship orientations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00266-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M., Gillett, A., & Doherty, B. (2019). Sustainability in SE: Hybrid organizing in public. Public Management Review, 21(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1438504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Procházková, T. P., Nosková, M., Machová, K., & Velíšková, V. (2021). Development of performance evaluation indicators for social enterprises: The use of Delphi echnique. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(6), 1396–1415. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2021.15629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, R., Fink, M., Lang, R., & Maresch, D. (2019). Social entrepreneurship and innovation in rural Europe. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318793196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salavou, H., & Cohen, S. (2021). Towards a typology of SEs based on performance: Some new evidence. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1718743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchis-Palacio, J. R., Campos-Climent, V., & Mohedano-Suanes, A. (2013). Management in social enterprises: The influence of the use of strategic tools in business performance. International Entrepreneurship & Management Journal, 9(4), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0262-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selden, S. C., & Sowa, J. E. (2004). Testing a multi-dimensional model of organizational performance: Prospects and problems. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 14(3), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, C., & Park, J. (2019). How social entrepreneurs’ value orientation affects the performance of social enterprises in Korea: The mediating effect of social entrepreneurship. Sustainability, 11(19), 5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siti-Nazariah, A. Z., Siti-Nabiha, A. K., & Azhar, Z. (2016). Managing Social and Economic Performance in Social Enterprise: A Review of Literature. In Qualitative Research Conference (pp. 47-73). Penang, Malaysia
   Google Scholar
• Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, W. G., & Kim, H. K. (2017). The variables of social enterprise support effecting job satisfaction through social performance. International Information Institute (Tokyo) Information, 20(12), 8413–8420.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, P., & McElwee, G. (2011). Situating community enterprise: A theoretical exploration. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(5–6), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.580161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnino, R., & Griggs-Trevarthen, C. (2013). Aresilient social economy? Insights from the community food sector in the UK. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(3–4), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.710268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staessens, M., Kerstens, P. J., & Cherchye, L. (2019). Data envelopment analysis and social enterprises: Analysing performance, strategic orientation and mission drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4046-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. T., Purdy, M. J., & Ventresca, J. M. (2018). How entrepreneurial ecosystems take form: Evidence from social impact initiatives in Seattle. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A., & Pittaway, L. (2005). Using knowledge within small and medium‐sized firms: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00116.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirumalsety, R., & Gurtoo, A. (2021). Financial sources, capital structure and performance of SEs: Empirical evidence from India. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 11(1), 27 46. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2019.1619337
   Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, I., Fergus, L., Leandro, S., & Caitlin, M. (2017). Public service innovation and multiple institutional logics: The case of hybrid social enterprise providers of health and wellbeing. Research Policy, 46(10), 1755–1768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2013). Source normalized indicators of citation impact: An overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison. Scientometrics, 96(3), 699–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0913-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Bai, Z. (2019). Empirical study on the relationship between subjective wellbeing of employees and social performance in social enterprises. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS ISIE) (pp. 18). IEEE. Hangzhou, China.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Business model innovation, legitimacy and performance: Social enterprises in China. Management Decision, 59(11), 2693–2712. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2019-0678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2015). The world Bank annual report. Annual Report.
   Google Scholar
• Yunus, M. (2020). Personal communication on Differences between social Business and social. Yunus Centre.
   Google Scholar