The discordance of governance performance from environmental and social performance on idiosyncratic risk: The effect of board composition

References

• Aabo, T., Pantzalis, C., & Park, J. C. (2017). Idiosyncratic volatility: An indicator of noise trading? Journal of Banking & Finance, 75, 136–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbar, S., Kharabsheh, B., Poletti-Hughes, J., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2017). Board structure and corporate risk taking in the UK financial sector. International Review of Financial Analysis, 50, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akisik, O., & Gal, G. (2017). The impact of corporate social responsibility and internal controls on stakeholders’ view of the firm and financial performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(3), 246–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2015-0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almaqtari, F. A., Elsheikh, T., Al-Hattami, H. M., & Mishra, N. (2023). The impact of board characteristics on environmentally friendly production: A cross country study in Asia and Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 392, 136257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorelli, M.-F., & García-Sánchez, I.-M. (2021). Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y., & Zhang, X. (2006). The cross-section of volatility and expected returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00836.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arayakarnkul, P., Chatjuthamard, P., & Treepongkaruna, S. (2022). Board gender diversity, corporate social commitment and sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1706–1721. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atena, F. W., & Tiron-Tudor, A. (2019). Gender as a dimension of inequality in accounting organizations and developmental HR strategies. Administrative Sciences, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10010001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attig, N., & Cleary, S. (2015). Managerial practices and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(1), 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, B. R., & Schuhmacher, F. (2016). Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data. The Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance, 59, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2015.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayton, J., Krasnikova, N., & Malki, I. (2022). Corporate social performance and financial risk: Further empirical evidence using higher frequency data. International Review of Financial Analysis, 80, 102030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. B. (2018). Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39(13), 3305–3325. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartram, S. M., Brown, G., & Stulz, R. M. (2012). Why are US stocks more volatile?. The Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1329–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L. A., & Tallarita, R. (2020). The illusory promise of stakeholder governance. SSRN Electronic Journal, 106, 91. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3544978
   Google Scholar
• Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., & Hasan, I. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder risk, and idiosyncratic volatility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, B. W., & Davidson, W. N. (2010). The relation between stakeholder management, firm value, and CEO compensation: A test of enlightened value maximization. Financial Management, 39(3), 929–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01100.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilal, Tan, D., Komal, B., Ezeani, E., Usman, M., & Salem, R. (2022). Carbon emission disclosures and financial reporting quality: Does ownership structure and economic development matter? Environmental Science & Policy, 137, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzino, N., Fatas, E., & Peterle, E. (2023). In transparency we trust an experimental study of reputation, transparency, and signaling. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 106, 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. (2022). Stakeholder governance: Solving the collective action problems in joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 47(2), 214–236. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buertey, S. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility assurance: The moderating effect of ownership concentration. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1579–1590. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttner, E. H., & Lowe, K. B. (2017). Addressing internal stakeholders’ concerns: The interactive effect of perceived pay equity and diversity climate on turnover intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(3), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2795-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L., Cui, J., & Jo, H. (2016). Corporate environmental responsibility and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 563–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2630-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, M., Edwards, G., & Kim, A. (2020). Doing well by doing wrong: Stakeholders salience, wrongdoing, and reputational penalties. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2020(1), 19962. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.60
   Google Scholar
• CFA Institute. (2023). Guidance for integrating ESG information into equity analysis and research reports. https://doi.org/10.56227/23.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Chang, X., Dasgupta, S., Wong, G., & Yao, J. (2014). Cash-flow sensitivities and the allocation of internal cash flow. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(12), 3628–3657. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K. C. W., Chen, Z., & Wei, K. C. J. (2009). Legal protection of investors, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C., Collins, D., & Huang, H. H. (2006). Shareholder rights, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting, 27(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-006-8795-2
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., & Feng, C. (2023). Does environmental information disclosure affect corporate cash flow? An analysis by taking media attentions into consideration. Journal of Environmental Management, 342, 118295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, G., Wang, B., & Wang, X. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and information flow. Accounting & Finance, 61(2), 2759–2807. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chindasombatcharoen, P., Chatjuthamard, P., Jiraporn, P., & Treepongkaruna, S. (2022). Achieving sustainable development goals through board size and innovation. Sustainable Development, 30(4), 664–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Tong, S., Jiraporn, N., & Proctor, R. (2020). How do independent directors view corporate social responsibility (CSR)? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Financial Review, 55(4), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, B. (2020). ESG investing: Conceptual issues. The Journal of Wealth Management, 23(3), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2020.1.117
   Google Scholar
• Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Garcia-Sanchez, I.-M., & Martinez-Ferrero, J. (2017). The impact of board structure on CSR practices on the international scale. European Journal of International Management, 11(6), 633–659. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2017.10008503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, X., Kang, J., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Villiers, C., Hsiao, P.-C. K., Zambon, S., & Magnaghi, E. (2022). Sustainability, non-financial, integrated, and value reporting (extended external reporting): A conceptual framework and an agenda for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(3), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-04-2022-1640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGiuli, A., & Kostovetsky, L. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobler, M., Lajili, K., & Zéghal, D. (2014). Environmental performance, environmental risk and risk management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., Liang, C., & Wanyin, Z. (2023). Board diversity and firm performance: Impact of ESG activities in China. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 1592–1609. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2090406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doukas, J. A., & Kim, C. (Francis), & Pantzalis, C. (2010). Arbitrage risk and stock iispricing. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(4), 907–934. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109010000293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility reporting in professional accounting firms. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitrescu, A., & Zakriya, M. (2021). Stakeholders and the stock price crash risk: What matters in corporate social performance?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmans, A. (2022). The end of ESG. Financial Management, 12413. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4221990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2021). ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2023). Board gender diversity and ESG decoupling: Does religiosity matter? Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. (2006). Governance for sustainability. Corporate Governance an International Review, 14(6), 522–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00527.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Commitment to corporate social responsibility measured through global reporting initiative reporting: Factors affecting the behavior of companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 81, 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M. A., & Laux, P. A. (2007). Corporate governance, idiosyncratic risk, and information flow. The Journal of Finance, 62(2), 951–989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01228.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrell, A., Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2015). Integrating sustainability into corporate governance: An empirical study on board diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(4), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2011.17.1.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Martín, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2020). Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giese, G., Nagy, Z., & Lee, L.-E. (2021). Deconstructing ESG ratings performance: Risk and return for E, S, and G by time Horizon, sector, and weighting. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(3), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2020.1.198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, A. (2008). Corporate governance as social responsibility: A research agenda. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26(1), 452. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38MS9P
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.18378878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubitta, P., & Gianecchini, M. (2002). Governance and flexibility in family-owned SMEs. Family Business Review, 15(4), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2002.00277.x
   Google Scholar
• Haque, F. (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, F., & Ntim, C. G. (2018). Environmental policy, sustainable development, governance mechanisms and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0772-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, O. D., & Zingales, L. (2022). The New corporate governance (w29975). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w29975
   Google Scholar
• Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, F., Qin, S., Liu, Y., & Wu, J. (George). (2022). CSR and idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from ESG information disclosure. Finance Research Letters 49, 102936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoepner, A. G. F., Oikonomou, I., Sautner, Z., Starks, L. T., & Zhou, X. (2016). ESG Shareholder Engagement and Downside Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2874252
   Google Scholar
• Hong, H., & Liskovich, I. (2015). Crime, punishment and the halo effect of corporate social responsibility. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, M. (2023). The influence of ESG ratings on idiosyncratic stock risk: The unrated, the good, the bad, and the sinners. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 75(3), 415–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-023-00155-1
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J. L. (2011). Applied nonparametric instrumental variables estimation. Econometrica, 79(2), 347–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. S., & Wang, C.-J. (2015). Corporate governance and risk-taking of Chinese firms: The role of board size. International Review of Economics & Finance, 37, 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husted, B. W., & de Sousa-Filho, J. M. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., Bagherzadeh, M., & Singh, J. J. (2020). Co-creation: A key link between corporate social responsibility, customer trust, and customer loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4015-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izcan, D., & Bektas, E. (2022). The relationship between ESG scores and firm-specific risk of Eurozone banks. Sustainability, 14(14), 8619. Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagannathan, R., Ravikumar, A., & Sammon, M. (2017). Environmental, social, and governance criteria: Why investors are paying attention (working paper 24063; Working Paper Series). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24063
   Google Scholar
• Kassinis, G., Panayiotou, A., Dimou, A., & Katsifaraki, G. (2016). Gender and environmental sustainability: A longitudinal analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2002). Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid, F., Razzaq, A., Ming, J., & Razi, U. (2022). Firm characteristics, governance mechanisms, and ESG disclosure: How caring about sustainable concerns? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(54), 82064–82077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21489-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. (2019). Corporate governance, ESG, and stock returns around the world. Financial Analysts Journal, 75(4), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1654299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. K., Zahid, R. A., Saleem, A., & Sági, J. (2021). Board composition and social & environmental accountability: A dynamic model analysis of Chinese firms. Sustainability, 13(19), 10662. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, I., Ryou, J. W., & Yang, R. (2020). The color of shareholders’ money: Institutional shareholders’ political values and corporate environmental disclosure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2012). Who is in charge? A property rights perspective on stakeholder governance. Strategic Organization, 10(3), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012453108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuzer, C., & Priberny, C. (2022). To green or not to green: The influence of board characteristics on carbon emissions. Finance Research Letters, 49, 103077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, S. P. (2000). Environmental ethics and information asymmetry among organizational stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006340624326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyereboah-Coleman, A., & Biekpe, N. (2006). The relationship between board size, board composition, CEO duality and firm performance: Experience from Ghana. Corporate Ownership & Control, 4(2), 114–122.
   Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., & Rusticus, T. O. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, T.-L., & Lin, W.-C. (2017). Corporate governance, product market competition, and the wealth effect of R&D spending changes. Financial Management, 46(3), 717–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, B., Rajgopal, S., & Venkatachalam, M. (2014). R2 and idiosyncratic risk are not interchangeable. The Accounting Review, 89(6), 2261–2295. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. (2018). Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52, 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Zhao, F., Chen, S., Jiang, W., Liu, T., & Shi, S. (2017). Gender diversity on boards and firms’ environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, M., & Orazalin, N. (2017). Green governance and sustainability reporting in Kazakhstan’s oil, gas, and mining sector: Evidence from a former USSR emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, M. (2015). Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: A brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2051-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsa, D. A., & Miller, A. R. (2013). A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(3), 136–169. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.5.3.136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGahan, A. M. (2020). Where does an organization’s responsibility end?: Identifying the boundaries on stakeholder claims. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(1), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, A. Y., Mackelprang, A. W., & Galbreth, M. R. (2016). Linking pollution toxicity and human exposure to firm idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 659–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses*. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00718.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S. S., Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., & Molloy, J. C. (2017). Firm-specific human capital investments as a signal of general value: Revisiting assumptions about human capital and how it is managed. Strategic Management Journal, 38(4), 912–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeem, M., Zaman, R., & Saleem, I. (2017). Boardroom gender diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence from Australian securities exchange listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 874–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazir, M., Akbar, M., Akbar, A., Poulovo, P., Hussain, A., & Qureshi, M. A. (2022). The nexus between corporate environment, social, and governance performance and cost of capital: Evidence from top global tech leaders. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(15), 22623–22636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17362-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2015). Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, 128–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2020). Business sustainability factors and stock price informativeness. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L.-T., & Thanh, C.-L. (2021). The influence of board characteristics on environmental performance: Evidence from East Asian manufacturing industries. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(10), 2702–2720. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2020-0744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L.-T., & Thanh, C.-L. (2022). The influence of board characteristics on environmental performance: Evidence from East Asian manufacturing industries. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(10), 2702–2720. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2020-0744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaev, V., & Van Lent, L. (2005). The endogeneity bias in the relation between cost-of-debt capital and corporate disclosure policy. European Accounting Review, 14(4), 677–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180500204624
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, P. M., Serrasqueiro, Z., & Leitão, J. (2012). Is there a linear relationship between R&D intensity and growth? Empirical evidence of non-high-tech vs. high-tech SMEs. Research Policy, 41(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell, M., & Ward, A. M. (2020). Shareholder theory/shareholder value. In S. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, M. Del Baldo, & R. Abreu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sustainable management (pp. 1–7). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_49-1
   Google Scholar
• Olthuis, B. R., & van den Oever, K. F. (2020). The board of directors and CSR: How does ideological diversity on the board impact CSR? Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongsakul, V., Treepongkaruna, S., Jiraporn, P., & Uyar, A. (2021). Do firms adjust corporate governance in response to economic policy uncertainty? Evidence from board size. Finance Research Letters, 39, 101613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orazalin, N., & Baydauletov, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1664–1676. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orazalin, N., & Mahmood, M. (2021). Toward sustainable development: Board characteristics, country governance quality, and environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3569–3588. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oware, K. M., Moulya, H., & Mallikarjunappa, T. (2022). Corporate social responsibility assurance, board characteristics and social performance disclosure. Evidence of listed firms in India. International Journal of Finance & Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2021). Sustainable investing in equilibrium. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 550–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2020). Do board characteristics drive firm performance? An international perspective. Review of Managerial Science, 14(6), 1251–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-019-00330-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (2000). The governance of the new enterprise. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, B., Gold, A., & Gold, S. (2022). ESG disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in initial public offerings. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(3), 867–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04847-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaee, Z. (2016). Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective. Journal of Accounting Literature, 36(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2016.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Rezaee, Z. (2019). Business sustainability, corporate governance, and organizational Ethics. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Dominguez, L., Gallego-Alvarez, I., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2009). Corporate governance and codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0035-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, M. V. (2008). Environmental Management: Readings and cases. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045–1061. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan, Y., Taylor, S., & Walter, T. (2014). The role of “other information” in analysts’ forecasts in understanding stock return volatility. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(4), 1346–1392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-013-9272-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stout, B. A. (2012). Handbook of energy for world agriculture. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Strine, L. E., Jr., Brooke, J. L., Diamond, K. M., & Parker, D. L., Jr. (2022, November). It’s time to focus on the “G” in ESG. Harvard Business Review, 18. https://hbr.org/2022/11/itstime-to-focus-on-the-g-in-esg
   Google Scholar
• Su, K., Liu, H., & Zhang, H. (2019). Board size, social trust, and corporate risk taking: Evidence from China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(6), 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauringana, V., Radicic, D., Kirkpatrick, A., & Konadu, R. (2017). Corporate boards and environmental offence conviction: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Corporate Governance the International Journal of Business in Society, 17(2), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2016-0105
   Google Scholar
• Tirole, J. (2001). Corporate governance. Econometrica, 69(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titman, S., Wei, K. J., & Xie, F. (2004). Capital investments and stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(4), 677–700. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000003173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valls Martinez, M. D. C., Cruz Rambaud, S., & Parra Oller, I. M. (2019). Gender policies on board of directors and sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1539–1553. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Delgado, M. S., Khanna, N., & Bogan, V. L. (2019). Good news for environmental self-regulation? Finding the right link. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 94, 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Wilson, C., & Li, Y. (2021). Gender attitudes and the effect of board gender diversity on corporate environmental responsibility. Emerging Markets Review, 47, 100744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaid, M. A., Wang, M., Adib, M., Sahyouni, A., & Abuhijleh, S. T. (2020). Boardroom nationality and gender diversity: Implications for corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., Li, X., Shen, D., & Teglio, A. (2016). R2 and idiosyncratic volatility: Which captures the firm-specific return variation?. Economic Modelling, 55, 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Shan, Y. G., & Chang, M. (2021). Can CSR disclosure protect firm reputation during financial restatements? Journal of Business Ethics, 173(1), 157–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04527-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Zhang, Z., & Yang, J. (2022). When does corporate social responsibility backfire in acquisitions? Signal incongruence and acquirer Returns. Journal of Business Ethics, 175(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04583-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, G. (2022). Good for managers, bad for shareholders? The effects of lone-insider boards on excessive corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Research, 140, 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., Álvarez-Etxeberria, I., & Ortas, E. (2020). The effect of the size of the board of directors on corporate social performance: A meta-analytic approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3), 1361–1374. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar