131
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Building legitimacy and distinctiveness on Nigerian-Canadian transnational ventures’ websites

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 505-526 | Received 28 Mar 2020, Accepted 26 Apr 2022, Published online: 30 Aug 2022

References

  • Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage Publications.
  • Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.
  • Austin, R. D., & Darby, C. A. (2003). The myth of secure computing. Harvard Business Review, 81(6), 120–126.
  • Bagwell, S. (2015). Transnational entrepreneurship amongst Vietnamese businesses in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(2), 329–349.
  • Bailetti, E. (2018). Transnational entrepreneurship: Distinctive features and a new definition. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(9), 28–38. doi:10.22215/timreview/1184
  • Bhide, A. (2000). The origin and evolution of new businesses. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.
  • Bouwmeester, O. (2013). Field dependency of argumentation rationality in decision-making debates. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(4), 415–433.
  • Brockriede, W., & Ehninger, D. (1960). Toulmin on argument: An interpretation and application. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 46(1), 44–53.
  • Brzozowski, J., Cucculelli, M., & Surdej, A. (2017). The determinants of transnational entrepreneurship and transnational ties’ dynamics among immigrant entrepreneurs in ICT sector in Italy. International Migration, 55(3), 105–125.
  • Carayannopoulos, S. (2009). How technology-based new firms leverage newness and smallness to commercialize disruptive technologies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(2), 419–438.
  • Carlos, V. S., & Rodrigues, R. G. (2012). Web site quality evaluation in higher education institutions. Procedia Technology, 5, 273–282.
  • Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Chen, W., & Tan, J. (2009). Understanding transnational entrepreneurship rough a network lens: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1079–1091.
  • David, M. E., David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2014). Mission statement theory and practice: A content analysis and new direction. International Journal of Business, Marketing and Decision Sciences, 7(1), 95–110.
  • De Clerq, D., & Voronov, M. (2011). Sustainability in entrepreneurship: A tale of two logics. International Small Business Journal, 29(4), 322–344.
  • Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.
  • Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It’s a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 147–166.
  • Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Tost, L. P., & Suchman, M. C. (2016). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. Alberta School of Business Research Paper no. 2016-901. Retrieved from http://msbfile03.usc.edu/digitalmeasures/tost/intellcont/Deephouse%20et%20al%202017-1.pdf.
  • Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360.
  • Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. C. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 44–77). Oxford UK: Sage Publishing.
  • Dheer, R. J. S. (2018). Entrepreneurship by immigrants: A review of existing literature and directions for future research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(3), 555–614.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 33(5), 1001–1021.
  • Export Development Canada (EDC). (2019). Nigeria. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.edc.ca/en/country-info/country/nigeria.html
  • Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A. (2016). Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383–409.
  • Fisher, G., Kuratko, D. F., Bloodgood, J. M., & Hornsby, J. S. (2017). Legitimate to whom? The challenge of audience diversity and new venture legitimacy. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 52–71.
  • Gangadhar, N., & Manahor, B. M. (2015). Understanding transnational entrepreneurship. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, 4(6), 52–67.
  • Garud, R., Lant, T. K., & Schildt, H. A. (2019). Generative imitation, strategic distancing and optimal distinctiveness during the growth, decline and stabilization of silicon alley. Innovation, 21(1), 187–213. DOI: 10.1080/14479338.2018.1465822
  • Garud, R., Schildt, H. A., & Lant, T. K. (2014). Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(5), 1479–1492.
  • Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L., & Corley, K. G. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 123–193.
  • Goldenstein, J., Hunoldt, M., & Oertel, S. (2019). How optimal distinctiveness affects new ventures’ failure risk: A contingency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(3), 477–495.
  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hasan, L. (2014). The usefulness of user testing methods in identifying problems on university websites. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 11(2), 229–256.
  • Hasan, L., & Abuelrub, B. (2011). Assessing the quality of web sites. Applied Computing and Informatics, 9(1), 11–29.
  • Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Canada (IRCC). (2018). Permanent residents admitted in 2017, by top 10 source countries. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship.html.
  • Isabelle, D. A., Westerlund, M., Rajala, R., & Leminen, S. (2016). Funders and founders: Partners in good times and in bad? International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 8(3), 269–288.
  • Jawahar, I., & McLaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 397–414.
  • Kabongo, J. D., & Okpara, J. O. (2019). Timing and speed of internationalization: Evidence from African banks. Journal of Business Research, 102, 12–20.
  • Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of dominant problems to stages of growth in technology-based new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257–279.
  • King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2008). Rethinking the relationship between reputation and legitimacy: A social actor conceptualization. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(3), 192–207.
  • Kuratko, D. F., & Brown, T. J. (2010). Emerging life sciences ventures: The quest for legitimacy. Business Horizons, 53, 211–220.
  • LaBianca, G., Fairbank, J. F., Thomas, J. B., Gioia, D. A., & Umphress, E. (2001). Emulation in academia: Balancing structure and identity. Organization Science, 12(3), 312–330.
  • Lin, X. (2010). The diaspora solution to innovation capacity development: Immigrant entrepreneurs in the contemporary world. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(2), 123–136.
  • Lin, X., & Tao, S. (2012). Transnational entrepreneurs: Characteristics, drivers, and success factors. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 50–69.
  • Liu, Y. (2017). Born global firms’ growth and collaborative entry mode: The role of transnational entrepreneurs. International Marketing Review, 34(1), 46–67.
  • Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545–564.
  • Lundberg, H., & Rehnfors, A. (2018). Transnational entrepreneurship: Opportunity identification and venture creation. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 150–175.
  • Martens, M. L., Jennings, J. E., & Jennings, P. D. (2007). Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1107–1132.
  • McKnight, B., & Zietsma, C. (2018). Finding the threshold: A configurational approach to optimal distinctiveness. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 493–512.
  • Mellahi, K., & Mol, M. J. (2015). Africa is just like every other place, in that it is unlike any other place. Africa Journal of Management, 1(2), 201–209.
  • Moghaddam, K., Rustambekov, E., Weber, T., & Azarpanah, S. (2018). Transnational entrepreneurship, social networks, and institutional distance: Toward a theoretical framework. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 21(1), 45–64.
  • Nalevanko, C. (2017). Measuring Organizational Legitimacy in Social Media. Sage Business and Management Ink. Sage Publishing. [Online]. Retrieved from https://managementink.wordpress.com/2017/02/21/measuring-organizational-legitimacy-in-social-media/
  • Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2011). Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 479–499.
  • Nkrumah, A. (2018). Immigrants’ transnational entrepreneurial activities: The case of Ghanaian immigrants in Canada. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 19(1), 195–211.
  • Norman, P. M., Artz, K. W., & Martinez, R. J. (2007). Does it pay to be different? Competitive non-conformity under different regulatory regimes. Journal of Business Research, 60(11), 1135–1143.
  • Olson, M., & Olson, M. (2009). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Packalen, K. A. (2007). Complementing capital: The role of status, demographic features and social capital in founder teams’ abilities to obtain resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 873–891.
  • Papadopoulos, N., & Hamzaoui-Essoussi, L. (2015). Place images and nation branding in the African context: Challenges, opportunities, and questions for policy and research. Africa Journal of Management, 1(1), 54–77.
  • Patel, P. C., & Conklin, B. (2009). The balancing act: The role of transnational habitus and social networks in balancing transnational entrepreneurial activities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1045–1078.
  • Patel, P. C., & Terjesen, S. (2011). Complementary effects of network range and tie strength in enhancing transnational venture performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(1), 58–80. doi:10.1002/sej.107
  • Perelman, C. (2008). The realm of rhetoric (1st ed). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Pollack, J. M., Rutherford, M. W., & Nagy, B. G. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 915–939.
  • Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642.
  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
  • Radulov, K., & Shymanskyi, O. (2014). Transnational entrepreneurs: Implications of the dual background on opportunity recognition: A case study of transnational entrepreneurs in the Skane region. Lund: Lund University.
  • Rajasekar, J. (2013). A comparative analysis of mission statement content and readability. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 14(6), 131–147.
  • Riddle, L., Hrivnak, G. A., & Nielsen, T. M. (2010). Transnational diaspora entrepreneurship in emerging markets: Bridging institutional divides. Journal of International Management, 16(4), 398–411.
  • Rieke, R. D., & Sillars, M. O. (2001). Argumentation and critical decision making (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
  • Rogerson, J. M., & Mushawemhuka, W. J. (2015). Transnational entrepreneurship in the global south: Evidence from Southern Africa. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 30(30), 135–146.
  • Santamaria-Alvarez, S. M., Muñoz-Castro, D. C., Sarmiento-González, M. A., & Marín-Zapata, S. I. (2018). Fragmented networks and transnational entrepreneurship: Building strategies to prosper in challenging surroundings. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 244–275.
  • Sequeira, J. M., Carr, J. C., & Rasheed, A. A. (2017). Transnational entrepreneurship: Determinants of firm type and owner attributions of success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1023–1044.
  • Shepherd, D. A., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). A new venture’s cognitive legitimacy: An assessment by customers. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2), 148–167.
  • Sommer, E., & Gamper, M. (2018). Transnational entrepreneurial activities: A qualitative network study of self-employed migrants from the former soviet union in Germany. Social Networks, 53, 136–147.
  • Statistics Canada. (2018). Research Blog: Immigrant entrepreneurs in Canada. [Online]. Retrieved from https://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/blog/cs/immigrant-entrepreneurs
  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
  • Taeuscher, K., Bouncken, R. B., & Pesch, R. (2020). Gaining legitimacy by being different: Optimal distinctiveness in crowdfunding platforms. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 149–179. doi:10.5465/amj.2018.0620
  • Tan, J., Shao, Y., & Li, W. (2013). To be different, or to be the same? An exploratory study of isomorphism in the cluster. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 83–97.
  • Terjesen, S., & Elam, A. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurs’ venture internationalization strategies: A practice theory approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1093–1120.
  • Tornikowski, E. T., & Newbert, S. L. (2007). Exploring the determinants of organizational emergence: A legitimacy perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 311–335.
  • Überbacher, F. (2014). Legitimation of new ventures: A review and research programme. Journal of Management Studies, 51(4), 667–698.
  • van Werven, R., Bouwmeester, O., & Cornelissen, J. P. (2015). The power of arguments: How entrepreneurs convince stakeholders of the legitimate distinctiveness of their ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(4), 616–631.
  • Vereb, V. N., & Ferreira, J. J. (2018). Transnational entrepreneurship as a Win-Win scenario of international knowledge spillover. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(2), 446–472.
  • Wang, Y. S., Tang, T. I., & Tang, J. T. E. (2001). An instrument for measuring customer satisfaction toward web sites that market digital products and services. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2(1), 89–102.
  • Zamparini, A., & Lurati, F. (2017). Being different and being the same: Multimodal image projection strategies for a legitimate distinctive identity. Strategic Organization, 15(1), 6–39.
  • Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2017). Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 93–113.
  • Zolin, R., & Schlosser, F. (2013). Characteristics of immigrant entrepreneurs and their involvement in international new ventures. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(3), 271–284.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.