253
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Returnee entrepreneurial entry decisions among forced and voluntary returnees in Ethiopia: A comparative study

& ORCID Icon
Pages 177-205 | Received 29 Nov 2021, Accepted 13 Dec 2022, Published online: 01 Jun 2023

References

  • Åkesson, L. (2015). Obstacles and openings: Returnees and small-scale businesses in Cape Verde. In Africa’s return migrants: The New developers, edited by L. Akesson and M. E. Baaz, 152–172. Uppsala: Zed Books Ltd.
  • Åkesson, L. (2016). Multi-sited accumulation of capital: Cape Verdean returnees and small-scale business. Global Networks, 16(1), 112–129.
  • Aldrich, H. E., & Waldinger, R. (1990). Ethnicity and entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 111–135.
  • Aliaga-Isla, R., & Rialp, A. (2013). Systematic review of immigrant entrepreneurship literature: Previous findings and ways forward. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(9-10), 819–844.
  • Bagwell, S. (2018). From mixed embeddedness to transnational mixed embeddedness: An exploration of Vietnamese businesses in London. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(1), 104–120.
  • Bai, W., Holmström Lind, C., & Johanson, M. (2016). The performance of international returnee ventures: The role of networking capability and the usefulness of international business knowledge. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(9-10), 657–680.
  • Bai, W., Johanson, M., & Martín, O. M. (2017). Knowledge and internationalization of returnee entrepreneurial firms. International Business Review, 26(4), 652–665.
  • Baláž, V., Williams, A. M., Moravčíková, K., & Chrančoková, M. (2021). What competences, which migrants? Tacit and explicit knowledge acquired via migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(8), 1758–1774.
  • Bamberger, P. A. (2018). AMD—Clarifying what we are about and where we are going.
  • Baron, R. A. (2007). Entrepreneurship: A process perspective. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (pp. 19–39). New York: Psychology Press.
  • BBC News Africa. (2021, June 14). We Make It or We Die - BBC Africa Eye documentary [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZriYK6A9eNE
  • Bilgili, Ö, Kuschminder, K., & Siegel, M. (2018). Return migrants’ perceptions of living conditions in Ethiopia: A gendered analysis. Migration Studies, 6(3), 345–366.
  • Bolzani, D. (2022). Assisted to leave and become entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurial investment by assisted returnee migrants. Academy of Management Discoveries. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2020.0179
  • Carling, J., & Erdal, M. B. (2014). Return migration and transnationalism: How are the two connected? International Migration, 52(6), 2–12.
  • Cassarino, J. P. (2004). Theorising return migration: The conceptual approach to return migrants revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies (IJMS), 6(2), 253–279.
  • Dahles, H. (2013). Cambodian returnees’ entrepreneurial ventures: The opportunities and constraints of mixed embeddedness. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 7(4), 383–396.
  • Dai, O., & Liu, X. (2009). Returnee entrepreneurs and firm performance in Chinese high-technology industries. International Business Review, 18(4), 373–386.
  • Davids, T., & Houte, M. V. (2008). Remigration, development, and mixed embeddedness: An agenda for qualitative research?. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 10(2), 169–193.
  • Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.
  • Debnath, P. (2016). Leveraging return migration for development: The role of countries of origin–A literature review. KNOMAD working paper 17. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Démurger, S., & Xu, H. (2011). Return migrants: The rise of new entrepreneurs in rural China. World Development, 39(10), 1847–1861.
  • Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1001–1022.
  • European Commission. (2021). New EU strategy on voluntary return and reintegration (No. 121). https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/news/new-eu-strategy-voluntary-return-and-reintegration-2021-04-22_en
  • Filatotchev, I., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Wright, M. (2009). The export orientation and export performance of high-technology SMEs in emerging markets: The effects of knowledge transfer by returnee entrepreneurs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 1005–1021.
  • Fransen, S., & Kuschminder, K. (2009). Migration in Ethiopia: History, current trends, and prospects. Paper Series: Migration and Development Country Profiles. Maastricht: Maastricht Graduate School of Governance.
  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
  • Granovetter, M. (2018). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. In M. Granovetter & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The sociology of economic life (pp. 22–45). New York: Routledge.
  • Gruenhagen, J. H. (2020). Returnee entrepreneurship: How home-country institutions, estrangement, and support influence entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), 945–966.
  • Gruenhagen, J. H., & Davidsson, P. (2018). Returnee entrepreneurs: Do they all boost emerging economies? International Review of Entrepreneurship, 16(4), 310–392.
  • Gruenhagen, J. H., Davidsson, P., & Sawang, S. (2020). Returnee entrepreneurs: A systematic literature review, thematic analysis, and research agenda. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 16(4), 310–392.
  • Hagan, J. M., & Thomas Wassink, J. (2020). Return migration around the world: An integrated agenda for future research. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 533–552.
  • Johannisson, B., Ramírez-Pasillas, M., & Karlsson, G. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: A leverage for business creation. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 14(4), 297–315.
  • Jones, T., Ram, M., Edwards, P., Kiselinchev, A., & Muchenje, L. (2014). Mixed embeddedness and new migrant enterprise in the UK. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(5-6), 500–520.
  • Kloosterman, R., & Rath, J. (2001). Immigrant entrepreneurs in advanced economies: Mixed embeddedness further explored. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(2), 189–201.
  • Kloosterman, R., Van der Leun, J., & Rath, J. (1999). Mixed embeddedness: (In)formal economic activities and immigrant businesses in the Netherlands. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 252–266.
  • Kloosterman, R. C. (2010). Matching opportunities with resources: A framework for analysing (migrant) entrepreneurship from a mixed embeddedness perspective. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(1), 25–45.
  • Kloosterman, R. C., & Rath, J. (2018). Mixed embeddedness revisited: A conclusion to the symposium. Sociologica, 12(2), 103–114.
  • Kuschminder, K., Andersson, L., & Seigel, M. (2018). Migration and multidimensional well-being in Ethiopia: Investigating the role of migrants’ destinations. Migration and Development, 7(3), 321–340.
  • Levie, J. (2007). Immigration, in-migration, ethnicity, and entrepreneurship in the United Kingdom. Small Business Economics, 28(2), 143–169.
  • Li, H., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Zhou, L. A., & Zhang, W. (2012). Returnees versus locals: Who perform better in China's technology entrepreneurship? Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), 257–272.
  • Lin, D., Lu, J., Liu, X., & Zhang, X. (2016). International knowledge brokerage and returnees’ entrepreneurial decisions. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(3), 295–318.
  • Lin, D., Zheng, W., Lu, J., Liu, X., & Wright, M. (2019). Forgotten or not? Home country embeddedness and returnee entrepreneurship. Journal of World Business, 54(1), 1–13.
  • Liu, X., Lu, J., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Wright, M. (2010). Returnee entrepreneurs, knowledge spillovers and innovation in high-tech firms in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1183–1197.
  • Liu, X., Wright, M., & Filatotchev, I. (2015). Learning, firm age and performance: An investigation of returnee entrepreneurs in Chinese high-tech industries. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 33(5), 467–487.
  • Marchetta, F. (2012). Return migration and the survival of entrepreneurial activities in Egypt. World Development, 40(10), 1999–2013.
  • Mayer, S. D., Harima, A., & Freiling, J. (2015). Network benefits for Ghanaian diaspora and returnee entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(3), 95–121.
  • McCormick, B., & Wahba, J. (2001). Overseas work experience, savings, and entrepreneurship amongst return migrants to LDCs. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48(2), 164–178.
  • Mreji, P., & Barnard, H. (2021). The micro-foundations of the returnee liability: The interpersonal challenges of returnee entrepreneurs in Kenya. Journal of International Management, 27(2), 100846.
  • Naudé, W., Siegel, M., & Marchand, K. (2017). Migration, entrepreneurship, and development: Critical questions. IZA Journal of Migration, 6(1), 1–16.
  • Nyame-Asiamah, F., Amoako, I. O., Amankwah-Amoah, J., & Debrah, Y. A. (2020). Diaspora entrepreneurs’ push and pull institutional factors for investing in Africa: Insights from African returnees from the United Kingdom. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 119876.
  • O’Donnell, P., O'Gorman, C., & Clinton, E. (2020). Rethinking the ‘necessity’ in necessity entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 827–830.
  • Ojo, S. (2017). Interrogating returnee entrepreneurship in the Nigerian context. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 11(5), 590–608.
  • Olesen, H. (2002). Migration, return, and development: An institutional perspective. International Migration, 40(5), 125–150.
  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy, 41(155), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819100066110
  • Pruthi, S. (2014). Social ties and venture creation by returnee entrepreneurs. International Business Review, 23(6), 1139–1152.
  • Qin, F., & Estrin, S. (2015). Does social influence span time and space? Evidence from Indian returnee entrepreneurs. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(3), 226–242.
  • Qin, F., Wright, M., & Gao, J. (2017). Are ‘sea turtles’ slower? Returnee entrepreneurs, venture resources, and speed of entrepreneurial entry. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 694–706.
  • Ram, M., Theodorakopoulos, N., & Jones, T. (2008). Forms of capital, mixed embeddedness, and Somali enterprise. Work, Employment and Society, 22(3), 427–446.
  • Ren, N., & Liu, H. (2015). Traversing between transnationalism and integration: Dual embeddedness of new Chinese immigrant entrepreneurs in Singapore. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 24(3), 298–326.
  • Ruben, R., Van Houte, M., & Davids, T. (2009). What determines the embeddedness of forced-return migrants? Rethinking the role of pre- and post-return assistance. International Migration Review, 43(4), 908–937.
  • Russell, S. S., Jacobsen, K., & Stanley, W.D. (1990). International migration and development in Sub-saharan Africa. World Bank Discussion Papers 101, World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • Sætre, A. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2021). Generating theory by abduction. Academy of Management Review, 46(6), 684–701.
  • Saxenian, A. (2002). Brain circulation: How high-skill immigration makes everyone better Off. The Brookings Review, 20(1), 28–31.
  • Saxenian, A. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35–61.
  • Shepherd, D. A., Williams, T. A., & Patzelt, H. (2015). Thinking about entrepreneurial decision making. Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 11–46.
  • Solano, G. (2020). The mixed embeddedness of transnational migrant entrepreneurs: Moroccans in Amsterdam and milan. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(10), 2067–2085.
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Sternberg, R., & Müller, C. (2010). New argonauts’ in China-return migrants, transnational entrepreneurship and economic growth in a regional innovation system: New geographies of migration. Die Erde; Zeitschrift Der Gesellschaft Fur Erdkunde Zu Berlin, 141(1-2), 103–125.
  • Thomas, K. J., & Inkpen, C. (2013). Migration dynamics, entrepreneurship, and African development: Lessons from Malawi. International Migration Review, 47(4), 844–873.
  • Tsuda, T. (2012). Whatever happened to simultaneity? Transnational migration theory and dual engagement in sending and receiving countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(4), 631–649.
  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2020). International Migration 2020 Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/452).
  • Van Houte, M., & Davids, T. (2008). Development and return migration: From policy panacea to migrant perspective sustainability. Third World Quarterly, 29(7), 1411–1429.
  • Wahba, J., & Zenou, Y. (2012). Out of sight, out of mind: Migration, entrepreneurship, and social capital. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(5), 890–903.
  • Wang, D. J. (2020). When do return migrants become entrepreneurs? The role of global social networks and institutional distance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(2), 125–148.
  • Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.
  • Wright, M., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Filatotchev, I. (2008). Returnee entrepreneurs, science park location choice and performance: An analysis of high–technology SMEs in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 131–155.
  • Yitshaki, R., Kropp, F., & Honig, B. (2021). The role of compassion in shaping social entrepreneurs’ prosocial opportunity recognition. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(2), 617–647.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.