Being there – XR performance at PQ23

References

• Adams, Matt. 2021. Matt Adams on Blast Theory. Edited by Andy Lavender. Digital Theatre Plus. https://edu.digitaltheatreplus.com/content/interviews/contemporary-performance-practice-blast-theory-matt-adams-interviewed-by#about
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. e-Duke Books Scholarly Collection. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Artaud, Antonin, and Victor Corti. 2010. The Theatre and its Double. London: One World Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W., and J. A. Underwood. 2008. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Presses du Réel.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Jeff. 2023. “In-story Augmented Reality: A Most Favored Nation.” PQ23, Art Talks, Prague.
   Google Scholar
• CEP (Confederation of European Probation). 2017. “Virtual Reality in Probation: ‘Don’t Forget Me.’” Confederation of European Probation. Accessed January 10, 2024. https://www.cep-probation.org/virtual-reality-in-probation-dont-forget-me/.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, Tung-Yen 2023. “From Theatre to VR and Back.” PQ23, Art Talks, Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Del Favero, Dennis, Susanne Thurow, and Lawrence Wallen. 2021. “The iDesign Platform: Immersive Intelligent Aesthetics for Scenographic Modelling.” Theatre and Performance Design 7 (1–2): 82–95. doi:10.1080/23322551.2021.1919488.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. 2020. Pluriversal Politics: The Real and the Possible. English edition. Latin America in translation / en traducción / em tradução. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fantová, Markéta. 2022. “15th Edition of Prague Quadrennial.” PQ. Accessed January 10, 2024. https://pq.cz/pq-2023-info/.
   Google Scholar
• Fantová, Markéta, et al. 2023. Catalogue of Prague Quadrennial of Performance Design and Space 2023. Prague: Arts and Theatre Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, James. 2016. “Virtual Reality Has a Storytelling Problem and Theater Will Save It.” https://www.uploadvr.com/virtual-reality-storytelling-problem-theater-will-save/.
   Google Scholar
• Fergusson Baugh, Cat. 2018. “Haptic Insights: Model Making as Historical Methodology.” Theatre and Performance Design 4 (1–2): 83–100. doi:10.1080/23322551.2018.1464843.
   Google Scholar
• Forchhammer, Julie, and Mette Lindberg. 2023. Homebox Theatre. Prague, PQ23.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James J. 1973. “‘Formless Invariants’ in Visual Perception.” Leonardo 6 (1): 43–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, Elizabeth. 2001. Architecture from the Outside: Essays on Virtual and Real Space, Writing Architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunia-Kuznetsova, Nino. 2023. Rare Memories of the Future. Prague PQ23.
   Google Scholar
• Halberstam, Jack. 2022. “Un/worlding: An Aesthetics of Collapse.” Keynote Address at Nature: Animal, Moral, Technological. Banff, Alberta, Canada, 25 May 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2015. “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin.” Environmental Humanities 6: 159–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, Shauna. 2023. This Space Is for You/Cet espace est pour toi. Prague PQ23.
   Google Scholar
• Lartigue, Béatrice, Fabien Togman, and Arnaud Desjardins. 2016. Notes on Blindness. France: ARTE France.
   Google Scholar
• Lovelock, James. 2019. Novacene: The Coming Age of Hyperintelligence. Penguin Science. UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, Joslin, and Scott Palmer. 2020. Scenography Expanded: An Introduction to Contemporary Performance Design. Performance + Design. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Palinhos, Jorge. 2023. “Actual and Virtual Worlds: A Performance of Experience.” Q23, Art Talks, Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Panda, Swati, and Satyendra C. Pandey. 2017. “Binge Watching and College Students: Motivations and Outcomes.” Young Consumers 18 (4): 425–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce-Grove, Ri. 2016. “Just One More: How Journalists Frame Binge Watching.” First Monday 22 (1–2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i1.7269.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael. 1967. The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Pōllu, Ivar. 2023. Eternity. Prague PQ23.
   Google Scholar
• Popat, Sita. 2016. “Missing in Action: Embodied Experience and Virtual Reality.” Theatre Journal 68 (3): 357–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, Chris. 2010. Entangled: Technology and the Transformation of Performance. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, Chris. 2022. Sensing Machines: How Sensors Shape Our Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Vives, Maria, and Mel Slater. 2005. “From Presence to Consciousness through Virtual Reality.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005 (May). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1651.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, Julia. 2022. “Binge-Viewing TV Worldwide 2020, by Country.” Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1196371/binge-watching-worldwide/#statisticContainer.
   Google Scholar
• Sundui, Ariunbold. 2023. Horizon – Sight Level. Prague, PQ23.
   Google Scholar
• Thapparat, Nattaporn. 2023. Theatre to Go. Prague PQ23.
   Google Scholar
• Thapparat, Nattaporn, Nicha Puranasamriddhi, Tanatchaporn Kiitikoing, Surachai Petsandrot, and Raksak Kongseng. 2023. “Theatre to Go; Watch from Home.” PQ23, Art Talks, Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Lisa May, and David R. Glowacki. 2018. “Seeing and Feeling in VR: Bodily Perception in the Gaps between Layered Realities.” International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 14 (2): 145–168.
   Google Scholar
• Thurow, Susanne. 2023. “Being Together Apart.” PQ23, Art Talks.
   Google Scholar