On the Unreliability of Multiple Systems Estimation for Estimating the Number of Potential Victims of Modern Slavery in the UK

References

• The Anti-Trafficking Monitoring Group (ATMG). (2010). Wrong kind of victim? One year on: An analysis of UK measures to protect trafficked persons. London, UK: The Anti-Trafficking Monitoring Group.
   Google Scholar
• Baillargeon, S., & Rivest, L.-P. (2007). Rcapture: Loglinear models for capture-recapture in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 19, 1–31. Retrieved from https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v019i05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bales, K., Hesketh, O., & Silverman, B. (2015). Modern slavery in the UK: How many victims? Significance, 12, 16–21. doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2015.00824.x
   Google Scholar
• Beddoe, C., Bundock, L., & Jardan, T. (2015). Life beyond the safe house for survivors of modern slavery. London, UK: Human Trafficking Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L., Silverman, B. W., & Vincent, K. (2019a). Multiple Systems Estimation for sparse capture data: Inferential challenges when there are non-overlapping lists. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.05156.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L., Silverman, B. W., & Vincent, K. (2019b). SparseMSE: Multiple systems estimation for sparse capture data. R Package. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/SparseMSE/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Craig, G. (2017). The UK’s modern slavery legislation: An early assessment of progress. Social Inclusion, 5, 16–27. doi:10.17645/si.v5i2.833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruyff, M., van Dijk, J., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2017). The challenge of counting victims of human trafficking: Not on the record: A multiple systems estimation of the numbers of human trafficking victims in the Netherlands in 2010–2015 by year, age, gender, and type of exploitation. Chance, 30, 41–49. doi:10.1080/09332480.2017.1383113
   Google Scholar
• Draper, N. R., & Smith, H. (1998). Applied regression analysis (3rd ed.). New York, USA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Durgana, D. P., & Zador, P. L. (2017). Fighting slavery through statistics: A discussion of five promising methods to estimate prevalence in the United States. Chance, 30, 50–53. doi:10.1080/09332480.2017.1383114
   Google Scholar
• Fienberg, S. E., & Rinaldo, A. (2012). Maximum likelihood estimation in log-linear models. Annals of Statistics, 40, 996–1023. doi:10.1214/12-AOS986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, P. (1989). The performance of the two-stage analysis of two-treatment, two-period cross-over trials. Statistics in Medicine, 8, 1421–1432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, A. (2017). What’s wrong with the Global Slavery Index? Anti-Trafficking Review, 8, 90–112.
   Google Scholar
• Goudie, I. B. J., & Goudie, M. (2007). Who captures the marks for the Petersen estimator? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 170, 825–839. doi:10.1111/rssa.2007.170.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guth, A., Anderson, R., Kinnard, K., & Tran, H. (2014). Proper methodology and methods of collecting and analyzing slavery data: An examination of the Global Slavery Index. Social Inclusion, 2, 14–22. doi:10.17645/si.v2i4.195
   Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. (2014). Modeling count data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2018). 2018 UK annual report on modern slavery. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2018-uk-annual-report-on-modern-slavery
   Google Scholar
• International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting (IWGDMF). (1995). Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation I: History and theoretical development. American Journal of Epidemiology, 142, 1047–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. R., Tomlinson, G. A., Hawker, G. A., Granton, J. T., Haddas, A., Grosbeing, B. M., & Feldman, B. M. (2010). A valid and reliable belief elicitation method for Bayesian priors. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 370–383. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique-Vallier, D., Price, M. E., & Gohdes, A. (2013). Multiple systems estimation techniques for estimating casualties in armed conflicts. In T. Seybolt, B. Fischoff, & J. Aronson (Eds.), Counting civilian casualties. An introduction to recording and estimating nonmilitary deaths in conflict (pp. 77–93). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, T. P., White, I. R., & Crowther, M. J. (2018). Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. arXiv:1712.03198v2 [stat.ME]. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.03198.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moser, B. K., & Stevens, G. R. (1992). Homogeneity of variance in the two-sample means test. American Statistician, 46, 19–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, O., & Zhuo, X. (2018). Modern trafficking, slavery, and other forms of servitude. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 407–439. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley, B., Venables, B., Bates, D. M., Hornik, K., Gebhardt, A., & Firth, D. (2013). Package `MASS’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MASS/MASS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, B. W. (2018). Modslavmse: Multiple Systems Estimates for estimating the prevalence of modern slavery. Retrieved from https://github.com/bernardsilverman/modslavmse
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, B. W. (2019). Model fitting in Multiple Systems Analysis for the quantification of modern slavery: Classical and Bayesian approaches. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.06078
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. J. M., & van der Heijden, P. G. M. (2016). Research brief. Multiple Systems Estimation for estimating the number of victims of human trafficking across the world. Vienna: UNODC. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2vk7ypg
   Google Scholar
• Walk-free Foundation. (2018). Global slavery index. Retrieved from https://www.globalslaveryindex.org/2018/data/country-data/united-kingdom/
   Google Scholar