Making sense of academic work: the influence of performance measurement in Swedish universities

References

• Aagaard, Kaare. 2015. “How Incentives Trickle Down: Local Use of a National Bibliometric Indicator System.” Science and Public Policy 42: 725–737. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksnes, Dag W., and Arie Rip. 2009. “Researchers’ Perceptions of Citations.” Research Policy 38 (6): 895–905. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askling, Berit. 2012. Expansion, självständighet, konkurrens. Vart är den högre utbildningen på väg? [Expansion, autonomy, competition. Where is higher education headed?]. Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, David. 2016. Metric Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Buela-Casal, Gualberto, and Izabela Zych. 2012. “What Do the Scientists Think about the Impact Factor?” Scientometrics 92 (2): 281–292. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0676-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, Peter. 2012. The Evaluation Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, Peter. 2014. “Constitutive Effects of Performance Indicators: Getting Beyond Unintended Consequences.” Public Management Review 16 (7): 969–986. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.770058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, Annette, and Robyn Thomas. 2002. “Managerialism and Accountability in Higher Education: The Gendered Nature of Restructuring and the Costs to Academic Service.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 13 (2): 179–193. doi:10.1006/cpac.2001.0497.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosières, Alain. 1990. “How to Make Things which Hold Together: Social Science, Statistics and the State.” In Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines, edited by Peter Wagner, Björn Wittrock, and Richard Whitley, 195–218. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, Claire. 2007. “The Qualitative Future of Research Evaluation.” Science and Public Policy 34 (8): 585–597. doi:10.3152/030234207X256538.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, Wendy N., and Michael Sauder. 2007. “Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (1): 1–40. doi:10.1086/517897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland, Wendy N., and Mitchell L. Stevens. 1998. “Commensuration as a Social Process.” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1): 313–343. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, Eugene. 1955. “Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas.” Science 122 (3159): 108–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gläser, Jochen, and Grit Laudel. 2007. “The Social Construction of Bibliometric Evaluations.” In The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems, edited by Richard Whitley and Jochen Gläser, 101–123. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gumport, Patricia J. 2000. “Academic Restructuring: Organizational Change and Institutional Imperatives.” Higher Education 39 (1): 67–91. doi:10.1023/A:1003859026301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarfelt, Björn, and Sarah de Rijcke. 2015. “Accountability in Context: Effects of Research Evaluation Systems on Publication Practices, Disciplinary Norms, and Individual Working Routines in the Faculty of Arts at Uppsala University.” Research Evaluation 24: 63–77. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvu029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarfelt, Björn, Gustaf Nelhans, Pieta Eklund, and Fredrik Åström. 2016. “The Heterogeneous Landscape of Bibliometric Indicators: Evaluating Models for Allocating Resources at Swedish Universities.” Research Evaluation 25 (3): 292–305. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, Lee. 2008. “Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Critical Review.” Quality in Higher Education 14 (3): 187–207. doi:10.1080/13538320802507711.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, Ellen. 2007. “The Impact of League Tables and Ranking Systems on Higher Education Decision Making.” Higher Education Management and Policy 19 (2): 1–24. doi:10.1787/17269822.
   Google Scholar
• Helms Mills, Jean, Amy Thurlow, and Albert J. Mills. 2010. “Making Sense of Sensemaking: The Critical Sensemaking Approach.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 5 (2): 182–195. doi:10.1108/17465641011068857.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, Mary. 1997. “Academic Values and the University as Corporate Enterprise.” Higher Education Quarterly 51 (2): 134–143. doi:10.1111/1468-2273.00031.
   Google Scholar
• Högskoleverket. 2009. Ranking of Universities and Higher Education Institutions for Student Information Purposes? (Report 2009:27 R). Stockholm: Swedish National Agency for Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, Diana. 2012. “Performance-Based University Research Funding Systems.” Research Policy 41 (2): 251–261. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongbloed, Ben, and Hans Vossensteyn. 2001. “Keeping Up Performances: An International Survey of Performance-Based Funding in Higher Education.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 23 (2): 127–145. doi:10.1080/13600800120088625.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, Sara. 2016. “The Active University: Studies of Contemporary Swedish Higher Education.” PhD diss., Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Levander, Sara. 2017. “Den pedagogiska skickligheten och akademins väktare: Kollegial bedömning vid rekrytering av universitetslärare” [Pedagogical proficiency and the watchers of the academy: Collegial assessment in the recruitment of university teachers]. PhD diss., Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, Loet, Paul Wouters, and Lutz Bornmann. 2016. “Professional and Citizen Bibliometrics: Complementarities and Ambivalences in the Development and Use of Indicators—A State-of-the-Art Report.” Scientometrics 109 (3): 2129–2150. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2150-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, John, and Hugh Willmott. 2013. “Taylorizing Business School Research: On the ‘One Best Way’ Performative Effects of Journal Ranking Lists.” Human Relations 66 (8): 1051–1073. doi:10.1177/0018726712467048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelhans, Gustaf. 2013. “Citeringens praktiker: det vetenskapliga publicerandet som teori, metod och forskningspolitik” [The practices of citation: Scientific publishing as theory, method, and science policy]. PhD diss., Göteborg: Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1997. In Search of Results: Performance Management Practices. Paris: PUMA/OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, Christopher, and Geert Bouckaert. 2004. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, Michael. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Rijcke, Sarah, Paul F. Wouters, Alex D. Rushforth, Thomas P. Franssen, and Björn Hammarfelt. 2016. “Evaluation Practices and Effects of Indicator Use: A Literature Review.” Research Evaluation 25 (2): 161–169. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottenburg, Richard, and Sally E. Merry. 2015. “A World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification.” In The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification, edited by Richard Rottenburg, Sally E. Merry, Sung-Joon Park, and Johanna Mugler, 1–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rushforth, Alexander, and Sarah de Rijcke. 2015. “Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands.” Minerva 53 (2): 117–139. doi:10.1007/s11024-015-9274-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauder, Michael, and Wendy N. Espeland. 2009. “The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review 74 (1): 63–82. doi:10.1177/000312240907400104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright. 1999. “Audit Culture and Anthropology: Neo-Liberalism in British Higher Education.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5 (4): 557–575. doi:10.2307/2661148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay, Jerome K. 2012. “Impact Factor: Outdated Artefact or Stepping-Stone to Journal Certification?” Scientometrics 92 (2): 211–238. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0561-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vught, Frans. 2008. “Mission Diversity and Reputation in Higher Education.” Higher Education Policy 21 (2): 151–174. doi:10.1057/hep.2008.5.
   Google Scholar
• van Vught, Frans, and Don F. Westerheijden. 2010. “Multidimensional Ranking.” Higher Education Management and Policy 22 (3): 1–26. doi:10.1787/17269822.
   Google Scholar
• Wedlin, Linda. 2007. “The Role of Rankings in Codifying a Business School Template: Classifications, Diffusion and Mediated Isomorphism in Organizational Fields.” European Management Review 4 (1): 24–39. doi:10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl E., Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, and David Obstfeld. 2005. “Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking.” Organization Science 16 (4): 409–421. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, Tammar B. 2008. “The Work of Meanings in Institutional Processes.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Roy Suddaby, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson, 151–169. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar