Using Machine Learning Methods to Predict Bias in Nuclear Criticality Safety

References

• Blum, A. L., and P. Langley. 1997. Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning. Artif. Intell. 97 (1–2):245–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. 2001. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhead, B. L., B. T. Rearden, C. M. Hopper, J. J. Wagschal, and C. V. Parks. 2004. Sensitivity-and uncertainty-based criticality safety validation techniques. Nuclear Sci. Eng. 146 (3):340–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, F. B., M. E. Rising, and J. L. Alwin. 2016. Lecture notes on criticality safety validation using MCNP & Whisper. Tech. Rep., Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, F. B., M. E. Rising, and J. L. Alwin. 2017. User manual for Whisper-1.1. Tech. Rep. LA-UR-17-20567, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Denison, D. G., B. K. Mallick, and A. F. Smith. 1998. A Bayesian CART algorithm. Biometrika 85 (2):363–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietterich, T. G. 2000. Ensemble methods in machine learning. In International workshop on multiple classifier systems, 1–15. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dietterich, T. G., and E. B. Kong. 1995. Machine learning bias, statistical bias, and statistical variance of decision tree algorithms. Tech. rep., technical report, Department of Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, H. 1997. Improving regressors using boosting techniques. ICML 97:107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Goorley, J. T., M. James, B. Thomas, F. Brown, J, Bull, L. J. Cox, J. Durkee, J. Elson, F. Michael, and R. A. Forster. 2012. Initial MCNP6 release overview. Nuclear Technol. 180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiedrowski, B., and F. Brown, 2013. Methodology, verification, and performance of the continuous-energy nuclear data sensitivity capability in mcnp6. Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on mathematics and computational methods applied to nuclear science and engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Kiedrowski, B. C., F. B. Brown, J. L. Conlin, J. A. Favorite, A. C. Kahler, A. R. Kersting, D. K. Parsons, and J. L. Walker. 2015. Whisper: Sensitivity/uncertainty-based computational methods and software for determining baseline upper subcritical limits. Nuclear Sci. Eng. 181 (1):17–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, A., and M. Wiener. 2002. Classification and regression by Random Forest. R News 2 (3):18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Pedregosa, F., et al. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12:2825–2830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prati, R. C., G. E. Batista, and M. C. Monard. 2009. Data mining with imbalanced class distributions: Concepts and methods. IICAI:359–376.
   Google Scholar
• Rearden, B. T. 2004. Perturbation theory eigenvalue sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo techniques. Nuclear Sci. Eng. 146 (3):367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refaeilzadeh, P., L. Tang, and H. Liu. 2009. Cross-validation. In Encyclopedia of database systems, 532–538. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scholkopf, B., and A. J. Smola. 2001. Learning with kernels: Support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond. MIT Press [Database].
   Google Scholar
• Solomatine, D. P., and D. L. Shrestha. 2004. AdaBoost. RT: A boosting algorithm for regression problems. In Neural networks, 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE international joint conference on, vol. 2, 1163–1168. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wager, S., T. Hastie, and B. Efron. 2014. Confidence intervals for random forests: The jackknife and the infinitesimal jackknife. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15 (1):1625–1651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, C., J. S. Bull, C. J. Solomon, F. B. Brown, G. W. McKinney, M. E. Rising, and A. J. Zukaitis. 2018. MCNP6.2 release notes. Tech. Rep. LA-UR-18-20808, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Zadrozny, B. 2004. Learning and evaluating classifiers under sample selection bias. In Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on machine learning, 114. ACM.
   Google Scholar