High-Order Mixed Finite Element Variable Eddington Factor Methods

References

• Ainsworth, M., G. Andriamaro, and O. Davydov. 2011. Bernstein–bézier finite elements of arbitrary order and optimal assembly procedures. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33 (6):3087–109. doi:10.1137/11082539X.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R., J. Andrej, A. Barker, J. Bramwell, J. S. Camier, J. Cerveny, V. Dobrev, Y. Dudouit, A. Fisher, T. Kolev, et al. 2021. MFEM: A modular finite element methods library. Comput. Math. Appl. 81:42–74. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2020.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anistratov, D. Y., and V. Y. Gol’din. 1993. Nonlinear methods for solving particle transport problems. Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. 22 (2–3):125–63. doi:10.1080/00411459308203810.
   Google Scholar
• Baudron, A. M., and J. J. Lautard. 2007. Minos: A simplified pn solver for core calculation. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 155 (2):250–63. doi:10.13182/NSE07-A2660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzi, M., G. H. Golub, and J. Liesen. 2005. Numerical solution of saddle point problems. Acta Numer. 14:1–137. doi:10.1017/S0962492904000212.
   Google Scholar
• Boffi, D., F. Brezzi, and M. Fortin. 2013. Mixed finite element methods and applications. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brezzi, F. 2003. Stability of saddle-points in finite dimensions, 17–61. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Ciarlet, P. 1988. Three-dimensional elasticity, ser. Mathematical elasticity. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrev, V., T. Ellis, T. Z. Kolev, and R. Rieben. 2013. High-order curvilinear finite elements for axisymmetric Lagrangian hydrodynamics. Comput. Fluids 83:58–69. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrev, V., T. Kolev, and R. Rieben. 2012. High-order curvilinear finite element methods for Lagrangian hydrodynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34 (5):B606–B641. doi:10.1137/120864672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrev, V., T. Kolev, C. S. Lee, V. Tomov, and P. S. Vassilevski. 2019. Algebraic hybridization and static condensation with application to scalable $h$(div) preconditioning. SIAM J. Sci. Comput 41 (3):B425–B447. doi:10.1137/17M1132562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, H., D. Silvester, and A. Wathen. 2014. Finite Elements and Fast Iterative Solvers: With Applications in Incompressible Fluid Dynamics, ser. Numerical Mathematics and Scie. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=9zSTAwAAQBAJ
   Google Scholar
• Falgout, R. D., and U. M. Yang. 2002. Hypre: A library of high performance preconditioners. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science-Part III, Ser. ICCS ’02, 632–41. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Haut, T. S., P. G. Maginot, V. Z. Tomov, B. S. Southworth, T. A. Brunner, and T. S. Bailey. 2019. An efficient sweep-based solver for the SN equations on high-order meshes. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 193 (7):746–59. doi:10.1080/00295639.2018.1562778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennart, J. P., E. H. Mund, and E. D. Valle. 1997. A composite nodal finite element for hexagons. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 127 (2):139–53. doi:10.13182/NSE97-A28593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, A. C., P. N. Brown, K. E. Grant, S. L. Lee, R. Serban, D. E. Shumaker, and C. S. Woodward. 2005. SUNDIALS: Suite of nonlinear and differential/algebraic equation solvers. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 31 (3):363–96. doi:10.1145/1089014.1089020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lautard, J., and F. Moreau. 1993. A fast 3-d parallel diffusion solver based on a mixed-dual finite element approximation. In Proceedings of the American Nuclear Society Topical Meeting: Mathematical Methods and Supercomputing in Nuclear Applications. Karlsruhe, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. S., and J. W. Demmel. 2003. SuperLU_DIST: A scalable distributed-memory sparse direct solver for unsymmetric linear systems. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 29 (2):110–40. doi:10.1145/779359.779361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, J., and J. E. Morel. 2021. A variable Eddington factor method with different spatial discretizations for the radiative transfer equation and the hydrodynamics/radiation-moment equations. Comput. Phys. 439:110393. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999121002886. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110393
   Google Scholar
• Lou, J., J. E. Morel, and N. Gentile. 2019. A variable Eddington factor method for the 1-D grey radiative transfer equations with discontinuous Galerkin and mixed finite-element spatial differencing. Comput. Phys. 393:258–77. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.012.
   Google Scholar
• Maginot, P. G., and T. A. Brunner. 2018. Lumping techniques for mixed finite element diffusion discretizations. J. Comput. Theor. Trans. 47 (4–6):301–25. doi:10.1080/23324309.2018.1461653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MFEM. Modular finite element methods [Software]. 2010. https://mfem.org.
   Google Scholar
• Miften, M., and E. Larsen. 1993. The quasi-diffusion method for solving transport problems in planar and spherical geometries. J. Trans. Theory Stat. Phys. 22 (2–3):165–86. doi:10.1080/00411459308203811.
   Google Scholar
• Mihalas, D. 1978. Stellar atmospheres. New York, NY; W. H. Freeman and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Olivier, S. S., and J. E. Morel. 2017. Variable Eddington factor method for the SN equations with lumped discontinuous Galerkin spatial discretization coupled to a drift-diffusion acceleration equation with mixed finite-element discretization. J. Comput. Theor. Trans. 46 (6–7):480–96. doi:10.1080/23324309.2017.1418378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivier, S., P. Maginot, and T. Haut. 2019. High order mixed finite element discretization for the variable Eddington factor equations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Olivier, S., W. Pazner, T. S. Haut, and B. C. Yee. 2023. A family of independent variable Eddington factor methods with efficient preconditioned iterative solvers. Comput. Phys. 473:111747. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999122008105. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111747
   Google Scholar
• Pazner, W., T. Kolev, and C. Dohrmann. 2022. Low-order preconditioning for the high-order finite element de rham complex. doi:10.1137/22M1486534.
   Google Scholar
• Quarteroni, A., and A. Valli. 1994. Numerical approximation of partial differential equations. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Raviart, P. A., and J. M. Thomas. 1977. A mixed finite element method for 2-nd order elliptic problems. In Mathematical aspects of finite element methods, eds. I. Galligani and E. Magenes, 292–315. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Rognes, M. E., R. C. Kirby, and A. Logg. 2010. “Efficient assembly of H(div) and H(curl) conforming finite elements. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 31 (6):4130–51. doi:10.1137/08073901X.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg, R. 1991. Postprocessing schemes for some mixed finite elements. Esaim: M2AN 25 (1):151–67. http://eudml.org/doc/193618.
   Google Scholar
• Warsa, J., and D. Anistratov. 2018. Two-level transport methods with independent discretization. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Transport 47 (4–6):424–50. doi:10.1080/23324309.2018.1497991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, D. 2018. Discrete ordinates radiation transport using high-order finite element spatial discretizations on meshes with curved surfaces,” Ph.D. diss., Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Ya. Gol’din, V. 1964. A quasi-diffusion method of solving the kinetic equation. USSR Comp. Math. Math. Phys. 4:136–49. doi:10.1016/0041-5553(64)90085-0.
   Google Scholar
• Yee, B. C., S. S. Olivier, T. S. Haut, M. Holec, V. Z. Tomov, and P. G. Maginot. 2020. A quadratic programming flux correction method for high-order DG discretizations of SN transport. Comput. Phys. 419:109696. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109696.
   Google Scholar