Comparing optical and electromagnetic tracking systems to facilitate compatibility in sports kinematics data

References

• Attenborough AS, Smith RM, Sinclair PJ. 2012. Effect of gender and stroke rate on joint power characteristics of the upper extremity during simulated rowing. J Sports Sci. 30:449–458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.616949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckeridge E, Hislop S, Bull A, McGregor A. 2012. Kinematic asymmetries of the lower limbs during ergometer rowing. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 44:2147–2153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182625231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckeridge EM, Bull AMJ, Mcgregor AH. 2015. Biomechanical determinants of elite rowing technique and performance. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 25:e176–e183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckeridge EM, Bull AMJ, McGregor AH. 2016. Incremental training intensities increases loads on the lower back of elite female rowers. J Sports Sci. 34:369–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1056821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull AM, Berkshire FH, Amis AA. 1998. Accuracy of an electromagnetic measurement device and application to the measurement and description of knee joint motion. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 212:347–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1243/0954411981534123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull AMJ, McGregor AH. 2000. Measuring spinal motion in rowers: the use of an electromagnetic device. Clin Biomech. 15:772–776. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(00)00043-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camomilla V, Cereatti A, Vannozzi G, Cappozzo A. 2006. An optimized protocol for hip joint centre determination using the functional method. J Biomech. 39:1096–1106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazza S, Mündermann L, Gambaretto E, Ferrigno G, Andriacchi TP. 2010. Markerless motion capture through visual hull, articulated ICP and subject specific model generation. Int J Comput Vis. 87:156–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-009-0284-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz AM, Haidegger T, Birkfellner W, Cleary K, Peters TM, Maier-Hein L. 2014. Electromagnetic tracking in medicine -A review of technology, validation, and applications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 33:1702–1725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2014.2321777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan EA, Jenkyn TR, Dunning CE. 2007. Direct comparison of kinematic data collected using an electromagnetic tracking system versus a digital optical system. J Biomech. 40:930–935. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.03.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemt C, Nolte D, Ding Z, Rane L, Quest RA, Finnegan ME, Walker M, Reilly P, Bull AMJ. 2019. Anthropometric scaling of anatomical datasets for subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling of the shoulder. Ann Biomed Eng. 47:924–936. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02207-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivukangas T, Katisko JP, & Koivukangas JP. 2013. Technical accuracy of optical and the electromagnetic tracking systems. SpringerPlus. 2:90. doi.https://doi.org/10.1186/2193–1801–2–90
   Google Scholar
• LaScalza S, Arico J, Hughes R. 2003. Effect of metal and sampling rate on accuracy of Flock of Birds electromagnetic tracking system. J Biomech. 36:141–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00322-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugade V, Chen T, Erickson C, Fujimoto M, Juan JGS, Karduna A, Chou L-S. 2015. Comparison of an electromagnetic and optical system during dynamic motion. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun. 27:1550041. doi:https://doi.org/10.4015/s1016237215500416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor AH, Buckeridge E, Murphy AJ, Bull AM. 2016. Communicating and using biomechanical measures through visual cues to optimise safe and effective rowing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part P J Sport Eng Technol. 230:246–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337115618552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor AH, Bull AMJ, Byng-Maddick R. 2004. A comparison of rowing technique at different stroke rates: a description of sequencing, force production and kinematics. Int J Sports Med. 25:465–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-820936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer KE, Saether EE, Soiney EK, Shebeck MS, Paddock KL, Ludewig PM. 2008. Three-dimensional scapular kinematics during the throwing motion. J Appl Biomech. 24:24–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.24.1.24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy AJ. 2009. Elite rowing: technique and performance. [PhD dissertation] London: Imperial College London, p. 289.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy AJ, Bull AMJ, McGregor AH. 2011. Optimizing and validating an electromagnetic tracker in a human performance laboratory. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med. 225:343–351. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041303310393231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng L, Burnett A, Campbell A, O’Sullivan P. 2009. Caution: the use of an electromagnetic device to measure trunk kinematics on rowing ergometers. Sport Biomech. 8:255–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14763140903229492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent R. 2012. Motion capture. In: Parent RBT-CA, editor. Computer animation. 3rd ed. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann; p. 187–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415842-9.00006-X.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock CL, Jenkyn TR, Jones IC, Ivanova TD, Garland SJ. 2009. Electromyography and kinematics of the trunk during rowing in elite female rowers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 41:628–636. doi:https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818c1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pueo B, Jimenez-Olmedo JM. 2017. Application of motion capture technology for sport performance analysis (El uso de la tecnología de captura de movimiento para el análisis del rendimiento deportivo). Retos. 2041:241–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i32.56072.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands AV, Cliff DP, Fairclough SJ, Boddy LM, Olds TS, Parfitt G, Noonan RJ, Downs SJ, Knowles ZR, Beets MW. 2016. Moving forward with backward compatibility: translating wrist accelerometer data. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 48:2142–2149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio Team, 2016. RStudio: integrated Development for R, 1. 1.456.ed. RStudio, Inc., Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Schwer LE. 2007. Validation metrics for response histories: perspectives and case studies. Eng Comput. 23:295–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-007-0070-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skublewska-Paszkowska M, Montusiewicz J, Łukasik E, Pszczoła-Pasierbiewicz I, Baran K, Smołka J, Pueo B. 2016. Motion capture as a modern technology for analysing ergometer rowing. Adv Sci Technol Res J. 10:132–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/61941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorriento A, Porfido MB, Mazzoleni S, Calvosa G, Tenucci M, Ciuti G, Dario P. 2020. Optical and electromagnetic tracking systems for biomedical applications: a critical review on potentialities and limitations. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 13:212–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2019.2939091.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urbanczyk CA, Mcgregor AH, Bull AMJ. 2019. Modelling scapular biomechanics to enhance interpretation of kinematics and performance data in rowing. ISBS Conf Proc Arch. 37(1):133–136. https://commons.nmu.edu/isbs/vol37/iss1/31
   Google Scholar
• Urbanczyk CA, Miller E, Mcgregor AH, Bull AMJ. 2020. Fatigue leads to altered spinal kinematics during high performance ergometer rowing. ISBS Conf Proc Arch. 38(1):256–259. https://commons.nmu.edu/isbs/vol38/iss1/66
   Google Scholar