Combat as a moving target: masculinities, the heroic soldier myth, and normative martial violence

References

• Achter, P. 2010. Unruly bodies: The rhetorical domestication of twenty-first-century veterans of war. Quarterly Journal of Speech 96, no. 1: 46–68. doi:10.1080/00335630903512697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkin, W., and L.R. Dobrofsky. 1978. Military socialization and masculinity. Journal of Social Issues 34, no. 1: 151–68. doi:10.1111/josi.1978.34.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baaz, M.E., and M. Stern. 2009. Why do soldiers rape? Masculinity, violence, and sexuality in the armed forces in the Congo (DRC). International Studies Quarterly 53, no. 2: 495–518. doi:10.1111/isqu.2009.53.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkawi, T., and S. Brighton. 2011. Powers of war: Fighting, knowledge, and critique. International Political Sociology 5, no. 2: 126–43. doi:10.1111/ips.2011.5.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, F.J. 1996. The organizational construction of hegemonic masculinity: The case of the US Navy. Gender, Work Organization 3, no. 3: 129–42. doi:10.1111/gwao.1996.3.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Basham, V.M., A. Belkin, and J. Gifkins. 2015. What is critical military studies? Critical Military Studies 1, no. 1: 1–2. doi:10.1080/23337486.2015.1006879
   Google Scholar
• Belkin, A. 2012. Bring me men: Military masculinity and the benign façade of American empire, 1898–2001. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best, G. 1998. War and Society in Revolutionary Europe 1770–1870. Guernsey: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, R. 1994. The delusion of impartial intervention. Foreign Affairs 73, no. 6: 20–33. doi:10.2307/20046926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, R. 2016. The soft underbelly of American primacy: Tactical advantages of terror. Political Science Quarterly 131, no. 2: 449–69. doi:10.1002/polq.v131.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, S. 2003. Afghanistan and the future of warfare. Foreign Policy 82, no. 2: 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke, J. 2000. An intimate history of killing: Face-to-face killing in twentieth-century warfare. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, B. 2006. Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. London & New York: Verso
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, A.D., and S.Q. Jensen. 2014. Combining hegemonic masculinity and intersectionality. Norma: International Journal For Masculinity Studies, 9, No. 1: 60-75.
   Google Scholar
• Clausewitz, C. 1976. On war. Trans. and eds. M. Howard and P. Paret. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R.W. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R.W., and J.W. Messerschmidt. 2005. Hegemonic masculinity rethinking the concept. Gender & Society 19, no. 6: 829–59. doi:10.1177/0891243205278639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, N., and M. Hurcombe. 2009. Editorial: The figure of the soldier. Journal of War & Culture Studies 2, no. 2: 103–04. doi:10.1386/jwcs.2.2.103_2
   Google Scholar
• Daggett, C. 2015. Drone disorientations: How ‘unmanned’ weapons queer the experience of killing in war. International Feminist Journal of Politics 17, no. 3: 361–79. doi:10.1080/14616742.2015.1075317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl Christensen, T. 2015. The figure of the soldier: Discourses of indisputability and heroism in a new Danish commemorative practice. Journal of War & Culture Studies 8, no. 4: 347–63. doi:10.1179/1752628015Y.0000000026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, G. 1994. Soldier heroes: British adventure, empire and the imagining of masculinities. Oxon & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duncanson, C. 2009. Forces for good? Narratives of military masculinity in peacekeeping operations. International Feminist Journal of Politics 11, no. 1: 63–80. doi:10.1080/14616740802567808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durieux, B. 2012. The history of grand strategy and the conduct of Micro Wars. In The Oxford handbook of war, eds. J. Lindley-French and Y. Boyer, 135–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, R.W. 1975. You can’t hack it little girl: A discussion of the covert psychological agenda of modern combat training. Journal of Social Issues 31: 13–23. doi:10.1111/josi.1975.31.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 1989. Bananas, beaches and bases. London: Pandora Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 2004. The curious feminist: Searching for women in a new age of empire. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 2007. Globalization and militarism: Feminists make the link. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 2013. Combat and ‘combat’: A feminist reflection. Critical Studies on Security 1, no. 2: 260–63. doi:10.1080/21624887.2013.814857
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 2015. The recruiter and the sceptic: A critical feminist approach to military studies. Critical Military Studies 1, no. 1: 3–10. doi:10.1080/23337486.2014.961746
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. 2001. War and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. 1981. National style in strategy: The American example. International Security 6, no. 2: 21–47. doi:10.2307/2538645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, D. 1996. On killing. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, D. 2014. On killing. New York: Open Road Integrated Media
   Google Scholar
• Hale, C. 2012. The role of practice in the development of military masculinities. Gender, Work & Organization 19, no. 6: 699–722. doi:10.1111/gwao.2012.19.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. 2006. Security as practice. Oxon & New York: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Higate, P. 2003. Concluding thoughts: Looking to the future. In Military masculinities: Identity and the state, ed. P. Higate. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, S. 2006. The dangers of playing dress-up: Popular representations of Jessica Lynch and the controversy regarding women in combat. Quarterly Journal of Speech 92, no. 1: 27–50. doi:10.1080/00335630600687123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. 2002. A very short introduction to Clausewitz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M., and P. Paret. 1976. Introduction in Clausewitz, C. On war, Howard, M. and P. Paret, eds and trans., Princeton: Princeton University Press: vii-xxx
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. 1957. The soldier and the state: The theory and practice of civil-military relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, K. 2008. Making sense of masculinity and war. Men and Masculinities 10, no. 4: 389–404. doi:10.1177/1097184X07306740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowitz, M. 1959. Changing patterns of organizational authority: The military establishment. Administrative Science Quarterly 3, no. 4: 473–93. doi:10.2307/2390811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A., ed. 2015. Frontline: Combat and Cohesion in the twenty-first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, P., and M. Henry. 2012. Rethinking masculinity and practices of violence in conflict settings. International Feminist Journal of Politics 14, no. 4: 445–49. doi:10.1080/14616742.2012.726091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, M. 2015. Beyond the band of brothers: The US military and the myth that women can’t fight. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messerschmidt, J.W. 2012. Engendering gendered knowledge: Assessing the academic appropriation of hegemonic masculinity. Men and Masculinities 15, no. 1: 56–76. doi:10.1177/1097184X11428384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, K. 2015. Death does not become her: An examination of the public construction of female American soldiers as liminal figures. Review of International Studies 41, no. 4: 757–79. doi:10.1017/S0260210514000424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, K. 2016. Mutually implicated myths: The democratic control of the armed forces and militarism. In Myth and narrative in international politics, ed. B Bliesemann de Guevara, 173–91. Abingdon: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. 1994. Theater of war: Combat, the military, and masculinity. In Theorizing masculinities, eds. H. Brod and M. Kaufman, 165–82. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newsome, B. 2003. The myth of intrinsic combat motivation. Journal of Strategic Studies 26, no. 4: 24–46. doi:10.1080/0141-2390312331279678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin, A., and D. Oberg. 2015. Targeting the ontology of war: From Clausewitz to Baudrillard. Millennium 43, no. 2: 392–410. doi:10.1177/0305829814552435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, M., and O. Sasson‐Levy. 2015. Avoiding military service in a militaristic society: A chronicle of resistance to hegemonic masculinity. Peace & Change 40, no. 4: 462–88. doi:10.1111/pech.2015.40.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Posen, B. 1993. Nationalism, the mass army, and military power. International Security 18, no. 2: 80–124. doi:10.2307/2539098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robben, A. 2006. Combat motivation, fear, and terror in twentieth-century argentinian warfare. Journal of Contemporary History 41, no. 2: 357–77. doi:10.1177/0022009406062073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasson-Levy, O. 2002. Constructing identities at the margins: Masculinities and citizenship in the Israeli army. The Sociological Quarterly 43, no. 3: 357–83. doi:10.1111/tsq.2002.43.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasson-Levy, O. 2003. Military, masculinity, and citizenship: Tensions and contradictions in the experience of blue-collar soldiers. Identities, Global Studies in Culture and Power 10, no. 3: 319–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasson-Levy, O. 2008. Individual bodies, collective state interests the case of Israeli combat soldiers. Men and Masculinities 10, no. 3: 296–321. doi:10.1177/1097184X06287760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shils, E., and M. Janowitz. 1948. Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II. The Public Opinion Quarterly 12, no. 2: 280–315. doi:10.1086/265951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L. 2007. Agency, militarized femininity and enemy others: Observations from the war in Iraq. International Feminist Journal of Politics 9, no. 1: 82–101. doi:10.1080/14616740601066408
   Google Scholar
• Stachowitsch, S. 2013. Professional soldier, weak victim, patriotic heroine: Gender ideologies in debates on women’s military integration in the US. International Feminist Journal of Politics 15, no. 2: 157–76. doi:10.1080/14616742.2012.699785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stouffer, S., et al. 1949. The American soldier. V. 2 Combat and its aftermath. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, H. 2012. Strategy and war in the oxford handbook of war, Lindley-French, J. and Y. Boyer, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 30–42
   Google Scholar
• Strong, J.D., P. Findley, S. McMahon, and B. Angell. 2015. What is war? Female Veterans’ experiences of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan. Affilia 30, no. 4: 489–503. doi:10.1177/0886109915585383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidy, J. 2016. The gender politics of “Ground Truth” in the military dissent movement: The power and limits of authenticity claims regarding war. International Political Sociology 10, no. 2: 99–114. doi:10.1093/ips/olw003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Creveld, M. 2000. Less than we can be: Men, women and the modern military. Journal of Strategic Studies 23, no. 4: 1–20. doi:10.1080/01402390008437809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L., et al. 2006. Why they fight: Combat motivation in the Iraq war. Carlisle Army Barracks, PA: Army War College Strategic Studies Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. 2000. Warrior heroes and little green men: Soldiers, military training, and the construction of rural masculinities. Rural Sociology 65, no. 4: 640–57. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00048.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, R., and N.K. Jenkings. 2012. Military memoirs, their covers and the reproduction of public narratives of war. Journal of War & Culture Studies 5, no. 3: 349–69. doi:10.1386/jwcs.5.3.349_1
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R., T. Winter, and K.N. Jenkings. 2009. Heroic anxieties: The figure of the British soldier in contemporary print media. Journal of War & Culture Studies 2, no. 2: 211–23. doi:10.1386/jwcs.2.2.211_1
   Google Scholar
• Zalewski, M. 1995. Well, what is the feminist perspective on Bosnia? International Affairs 71, no. 2: 339–56. doi:10.2307/2623438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar