Designing the Pentagon Memorial: gendered statecraft, heroic victimhood and site authenticity in War on Terror commemoration

References

• Barthes, R. 1967. Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Basham, V. 2013. War, Identity and the Liberal State: Everyday Experiences of the Geopolitical in the Armed Forces. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Basham, V. 2018. “Liberal Militarism as Insecurity, Desire and Ambivalence: Gender, Race and The Everyday Geopolitics Of War.” Desire and Ambivalence: Gender, Race and The Everyday Geopolitics Of War', Security Dialogue 49 (1–2): 32–43. doi:10.1177/0967010617744977.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, A. 2017. The Political Afterlife of Sites of Monumental Destruction: Reconstructing Affect in Mostar and New York. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doss, E. 2010. Memorial Mania: Public Feeling in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edkins, J. 2003. Trauma and the Memory of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elshtain, J. B. 1982. “On Beautiful Souls, Just Warriors and Feminist Consciousness.” Women’s Studies International Forum 5 (3–4): 341–348. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(82)90043-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 2007. Globalization and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Flight 93 Memorial Taskforce. 2004. Planning and Design Process (National Park Service). https://www.nps.gov/flni/learn/management/upload/Attach2_advcomminutes_nov14_04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foote, K. E. 1997. Shadowed Ground: America’s Landscapes of Violence and Tragedy. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1979. “Authorship: What is an Author?” Screen 20 (1): 13–34. doi:10.1093/screen/20.1.13.
   Google Scholar
• Haru Fisher, R. n.d. “Park of the Week: John Ericsson National Memorial, Washington, D.C.” Frommers. Accessed 20 April 2018. https://www.frommers.com/trip-ideas/outdoor-adventure/park-of-the-week-john-ericsson-national-memorial-washington-d-c
   Google Scholar
• Heath-Kelly, C. 2016. Death and Security: Memory and Mortality at the Bombsite. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath-Kelly, C. 2018. “Survivor Trees and Memorial Groves: Vegetal Commemoration of Victims of Terrorism in Europe and the United States.” Political Geography 64: 63–72. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath-Kelly, C. 2019. “Sacred Rituals of the Security State: Reclaiming Bodies and Making Relics from Ground Zero.” In The Materiality of Mourning: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, edited by Z. Newby and R. Toulson. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 205–221.
   Google Scholar
• Hite, K. 2012. Politics and the Art of Commemoration: Memorials to Struggle in Latin America and Spain. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T. [1651] 2008. Leviathan; or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil, edited by M. Oakeshott. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Linenthal, E. 2001. The Unfinished Bombing: Oklahoma City in American Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lower Manhattan Development Corporation. 2003a. Final Scope: World Trade Center Memorial and Redevelopment Plan Generic Environmental Impact Statement. New York: Lower Manhattan Development Corporation. Accessed 2 May 2018. http://www.renewnyc.com/content/pdfs/WTC_GEIS_Final_Scope.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lower Manhattan Development Corporation. 2003b. LMDC All Advisory Council Meeting on the Draft Memorial Mission Statement and Program. New York: Lower Manhattan Development Corporation. Accessed 2 May 2018. http://www.renewnyc.com/content/meetings/1.15.03FinalMinutes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, C., and D. Ingle. 1999. Blood Sacrifice and the Nation: Totem Rituals and the American Flag. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. T. J. 2011. Cloning Terror: The War of Images; 9/11 to the Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pentagon Memorial Family Steering Committee. 2002. Pentagon Memorial Commission Mission Statement. Washington: U.S. Department of Defense. Accessed 30 April 2018. http://archive.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=43622
   Google Scholar
• Pin-Fat, V. 2010. Universality, Ethics and International Relations: A Grammatical Reading. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, R. 2009. On Hallowed Ground: The Story of Arlington National Cemetery. New York: Walker & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, M. 1996. “Memory, Sacrifice and the Nation.” New Formations 30: 8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sagalyn, L. 2016. Power at Ground Zero: Politics, Money, and the Remaking of Lower Manhattan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, K. 2009. Monument Wars: Washington D.C., The National Mall and the Transformation of the Memorial Landscape. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, D. 2006. 9/11: The Culture of Commemoration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, J., and N. Tweedie. 2011. “9/11 Ten Years On: The Heroes of Ground Zero.” The Telegraph, September 9. Accessed 11 March 2019. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/september-11-attacks/8750377/911-10-years-on-the-heroes-of-Ground-Zero.html
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress. 1993. “S.J.Res.129 - A Joint Resolution to Authorize the Placement of A Memorial Cairn in Arlington National Cemetery, Arlington, Virginia, to Honor the 270 Victims of the Terrorist Bombing of Pan Am Flight 103.” 103rd Congress (1993–1994). Accessed 12 May 2018. https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/senate-joint-resolution/129/text
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 2016. Queer International Relations: Sovereignty, Sexuality and the Will to Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, G. 2004. “National Subjects: September 11 and Pearl Harbor.” American Ethnologist 31 (3): 293–310. doi:10.1525/ae.2004.31.3.293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 2003. “The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1086/375708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. 1992. “The Counter-Monument: Memory against Itself in Germany Today.” Critical Inquiry 18 (2): 267–296. doi:10.1086/448632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. 2016. The Stages of Memory: Reflections on Memorial Art, Loss, and the Spaces Between. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar