Critical veteran researchers’ unique adequacy: accounting for friendly-fire and fratricide

References

• Andrews, D. H. 2010. “Preface.” In Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification, edited by D. H. Andrew, P. R. Herz, and M. B. Wolf, pxxxi-xxxiv. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. H., P. R. Herz, and M. B. Wolf. 2010. Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. 2010. “The Case for Active Fratricide Avoidance in Net-Centric Systems.” In Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification, edited by D. H. Andrew, P. R. Herz, and M. B. Wolf, 313–326. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Basham, V., A. Belkin, and J. Gifkins. 2015. “What Is Critical Military Studies?” Critical Military Studies 1 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1080/23337486.2015.1006879.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, D. 2009. Task Force Helmand. London: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, H. 2010. “Foreword.” In Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification, edited by D. H. Andrew, P. R. Herz, and M. B. Wolf, p. xxviiii-xxx. Farnham Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bickers, R. T. 1994. Friendly Fire: Accidents in Battle from Ancient Greece to the Gulf War. London: Leo Cooper.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, C. D. B. 1976. Friendly Fire. London: Bantam.
   Google Scholar
• Bury, P. 2010. Callsign Hades. London: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Carrieras, H., and A. Caetano. 2016. “Reflexivity and the Sociological Study of the Military.” In Researching the Military, edited by H. Carrieras, C. Castro, and S. Frederic, 8–22. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, R. 2012. First Soldiers Down: Canada’s Friendly Fire Deaths in Afghanistan. Toronto, Canada: Dundurn.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. 2019. War Story. Carol Stream, Illinois: Tyndale Momentum.
   Google Scholar
• Elsey, C., M. Mair, P. V. Smith, and P. G. Watson. 2016. “Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and the Study of action-in-interaction in Military Settings.” In The Routledge Companion to Military Research Methods, 180–195. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315613253-22.
   Google Scholar
• Fincannon, T., Evans, A. W., Jentsch, F., Keebler, J., et al. 2010. “Dimensions of Spatial Ability and Their Influence on Performance with Unmanned Systems.” In Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification, edited by D. H. Andrew, P. R. Herz, and M. B. Wolf, 67–81. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Friscolanti, M. 2005. Friendly Fire. Mississauga, Ontario: John Wiley and Sons Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, I. 2012. The Yompers. Barnsley, UK: Pen and Sword.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s Program. Lantham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 2019. “Parsons’ Primer.” In Harold Garfinkel: Parsons’ Primer, edited by A. W. Rawls, 109–326. Siegen, Germany: J.B. Metzler.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A. 2012. “Judged by Twelve and Carried by Six; the Soldier’s Dilemma – The British Perspective on Combat Identification.” In Fratricide in Battle: (Un)friendly Fire, edited by C. Kirke, 200–218. London: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Greitzer, F. L., and D. H. Andrews. 2010. “Training Strategies to Mitigate Expectant-Induced Response Bias in Combat Identification: A Research Agenda.” In Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification, edited by D. H. Andrew, P. R. Herz, and M. B. Wolf, 173–190. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, D. 1995. On Killing. London: Little Brown and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Harari, Y. N. 2008. The Ultimate Experience. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. 1990. Critical Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey, P. 2009. The Junior Officers’ Reading Club. London: Penguin: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey, P. 2012. Kandak. London: Penguin: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Higate, P., and A. Cameron. 2006. “Reflexivity and Researching the Military.” Armed Forces & Society 32 (2): 219–233. doi:10.1177/0095327X05278171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. 2016. “The Aesthetic of Being in the Field: Participant Observation with the Infantry. In Routledge Companion to Military Research Methods”. In edited by A. Williams, K. N. Jenkings, M. Rech, and R. Woodward, 207–218. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkings, K.N. 2018. ‘Unique Adequacy’ in Studies of the Military, Militarism and Militarisation. Ethnographic Studies 15: 38–57.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkings, K..N., and J. Beales. 2022. Pilgrimage Respecified:Falklands War Vetereans’ Accounts oftheir Returns to the Falkland Islands. Journal of War and Culture 15 (3): 328–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkings, K.N., T. Winter, and R. Woodward. 2008. The Emergent Production of Analysis in Photo Elicitation: Pictures of Military Identity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 9 (3): Article 30.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkings, K.N., and R. Woodward. 2014. Practices of Authorial Collaboration: the Collaborative production of the Contemporary Military Memoir; Cultural Studies <-> Critical Methodologies 14 (4): 338–350.
   Google Scholar
• Jormakka, J. 2012. “Fraticide Prevention: A Sceptic’s View.” In Fratricide in Battle: (Un)friendly Fire, edited by C. Kirke, 219–227. London: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Keebler, J. R., Sciarini, L. W., Jensch, F., Nicholson, D., Fincannon, T., et al. 2010. “A Cognitive Basic for Friend-Foe Misidentification of Vehicles in Combat.” In Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification, edited by D. H. Andrew, P. R. Herz, and M. B. Wolf, 113–127. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. 2013. The Combat Soldier. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirke, C. 2012. “The Fratricide Problem and Potential Solutions – An Overview.” In Fratricide in Battle: (Un)friendly Fire, edited by C. Kirke, 36–48. London: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. L. 2011. Don’t They Know We’re on Their Side: A Story of Friendly Fire in Fallujah. USA: No Publisher Named. copyright claimed by J. Linhart.
   Google Scholar
• Mistry, B., Croft, G., Dean, D., Gadsden, J., Conway, G., Cornes, K., et al. 2010. “Analysis of the Tasks Conducted by Forward Air Controllers and Pilots during Simulated Close Air Support Missions: Supporting the Development of the INCIDER Model.” In Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification, edited by D. H. Andrew, P. R. Herz, and M. B. Wolf, 217–226. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, H. 2018. Our Boys: The Story of a Paratrooper. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Pharaon, J. W. 2010. “Mitigating Friendly Frire Casualties through Enhanced Battle Command Capabilities.” In Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification, edited by D. H. Andrew, P. R. Herz, and M. B. Wolf, 327–353, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, J. L. 2000. A Chain of Events: The Government Cover-up of the Black Hawk Incident and the Friendly Fire Death of Lt. Laura Piper. Dulles, Virginia: Brassey’s.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, G. 1995a. Back Fire: The Tragic Story of Friendly Fire in Warfare from Ancient Times to the Gulf War. London: Robson Books.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, G. 1995b. Blue on Blue: A History of Friendly Fire. New York: Avon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shay, J. 1994. Achilles in Vietnam: Combat Trauma and the Undoing of Character. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Shay, J. 2002. Odysseus in America: Combat Trauma and the Trials of Homecoming. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Shingledecker, C., Weldon, D. E., Behymer, K., Simpkins, B., Lerner, E., Warm, J., Matthews, G., Finomore, V., Shaw, T., Murphy, J. S., et al. 2010. “Measuring Vigilance Abilities to Enhance Combat Identification Performance.” In Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification, edited by D. H. Andrew, P. R. Herz, and M. B. Wolf, 47–66. Farnham Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Snook, S. A. 2000. Friendly Fire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and Situated Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Summers, S. H. 2010. “Preattentive Attributes in Vizualization Design: Enhancing Combat Identification.” In Human Factors Issues in Combat Identification, edited by D. H. Andrew, P. R. Herz, and M. B. Wolf, 129–143. Farnham Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Syms, P. R. 2012. “An Historical Analysis of Fratricide.” In Fratricide in Battle: (Un)friendly Fire, edited by C. Kirke, 7–35. London: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. I., and F. Znaniecki. 1919. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America: Monograph of an Immigrant Group. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Army. 1993. Military Operation: U.S Amy Operations Concept for combat Identification (TRADOC Pam 525-58). Fort Monroe, VA: Training and Doctrine Command.
   Google Scholar
• Vom Lehn, D. 2014. Harold Garfinkel: The Creation and Development of Ethnomethodology. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D. 2016. “Putting ‘insider-ness’ to Work: Researching Identity Narratives of Career Soldiers about to Leave the Army.” In Routledge Companion to Military Research Methods, edited by A. Williams, K. N. Jenkings, M. Rech, and R. Woodward, 256–267. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1999. Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, H., and S. Antrobus. 2021. “‘Deeply Odd’: Women Veterans as Critical Feminist Scholars”. Critical Military Studies 1–16. doi:10.1080/23337486.2021.1907020.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R., and K.N. Jenkings. 2011. Military Identities in the Situated Accounts of British Milirary Personnel. Sociology 45 (2): 252–268.
   Google Scholar