Effect of curing and silanizing on composite repair bond strength using an improved micro-tensile test method

References

• Krejci I, Lieber CM, Lutz F. Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss. Dent Mater. 1995;11:34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum IR, Lynch CD, Wilson NH. Teaching of direct composite restoration repair in undergraduate dental schools in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Eur J Dent Educ. 2012;16:e53–e58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum IR, Lynch CD, Wilson NH. Teaching of the repair of defective composite restorations in Scandinavian dental schools. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:210–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch CD, Blum IR, Frazier KB, et al. Repair or replacement of defective direct resin-based composite restorations: contemporary teaching in U.S. and Canadian dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012;143:157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staxrud F, Tveit AB, Rukke HV, et al. Repair of defective composite restorations. A questionnaire study among dentists in the Public Dental Service in Norway. J Dent. 2016;52:50–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosh T, Baharav H, Gross O, et al. The influence of surface loading and irradiation time during curing on mechanical properties of a composite. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:573–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, et al. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater. 2006;22:973–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagouvardos PE, Pissis P, Kyritsis A, et al. Water sorption and water-induced molecular mobility in dental composite resins. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003;14:753–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarumi H, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y. Relationship between particle size of barium glass filler and water sorption of light-cured composite resin. Dent Mater J. 1995;14:37–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Blaser PK, et al. A long-term evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of resin-based composite restorations: results of a seven-year study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140:1476–1484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez EM, Martin JA, Angel PA, et al. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Braz Dent J. 2011;22:134–139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ozcan M, Koc-Dundar B. Composite-composite adhesion in dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2014;28:2209–2229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson ST, Tibballs J, Dahl JE. Effect of different surface treatments and adhesives on repair bond strength of resin composites after one and 12 months of storage using an improved microtensile test method. Oper Dent. 2014;39:E206–E216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamano N, Chiang YC, Nyamaa I, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the repair strength of a nanofilled resin-based composite. Dent Mater J. 2011;30:537–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ. The repair potential of resin composite materials. Dent Mater. 2011;27:e20–e27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, et al. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1276–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Silanising agents promote resin-composite repair. Int Dent J. 2015;65:311–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbery TA, Gray T, DeLatour F, et al. Evaluation of flexural, diametral tensile, and shear bond strength of composite repairs. Oper Dent. 2014;39:E250–E260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tantbirojn D, Fernando C, Versluis A. Failure Strengths of Composite Additions and Repairs. Oper Dent. 2015;40:364–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho SD, Rajitrangson P, Matis BA, et al. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, air abrasion, and silane application on repaired shear bond strength of composites. Oper Dent. 2013;38:E1–E9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Costa TRF, Serrano AM, Atman APF, et al. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent. 2012;40:513–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan M, Corazza PH, Marocho SMS, et al. Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:1751–1758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcellos DC, Santos VMM, Niu LN, et al. Repair of composites: effect of laser and different surface treatments. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2015;59:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho PG, Calamia C, Harsono M, et al. Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1297–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall'Oca S, Papacchini F, Goracci C, et al. Effect of oxygen inhibition on composite repair strength over time. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2007;81:493–498.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, et al. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent. 1989;17:61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO/TS 11405:2015, Dentistry – testing of adhesion to tooth structure. 3rd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organization; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Blum IR, Schriever A, Heidemann D, et al. The repair of direct composite restorations: an international survey of the teaching of operative techniques and materials. Eur J Dent Educ. 2003;7:41–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lise DP, Vieira LCC, Araujo E, et al. Tooth fragment reattachment: the natural restoration. Oper Dent. 2012;37:584–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruyter IE, Monomer systems and polymerization. Utrect: Peter Szulc Publishing Co.; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Nie J, Linden LA, Rabek JF, et al. A reappraisal of the photopolymerization kinetics of triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate initiated by camphorquinone-N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine for dental purposes. Acta Polym. 1998;49:145–161.
   Google Scholar
• Lung CYK, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater. 2012;28:467–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues SA Jr, Ferracane JL, Della Bona A. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2009;25:442–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonstein T, Garlapo D, Donarummo J Jr, et al. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan M, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. al. Effect of drying time of 3-methacryloxypropyl-trimethoxysilane on the shear bond strength of a composite resin to silica-coated base/noble alloys. Dent Mater. 2004;20:586–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente LL, Sarkis Onofre R, Concalves AP, et al. Repair bond strength of dental composites: systemic review. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2016;69:15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall PK, Ruyter E, Ronold HJ, et al. Comparison of different etching agents and repair materials used on feldspathic porcelain. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2009;23:1177–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graiff L, Piovan C, Vigolo P, et al. Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements. J Prosthodont. 2008;17:294–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burtscher P. Stability of radicals in cured composite materials. Dent Mater. 1993;9:218–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruyter IE, Svendsen SA. Remaining methacrylate groups in composite restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand. 1978;36:75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory WA, Pounder B, Bakus E. Bond strengths of chemically dissimilar repaired composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:664–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res. 1995;74:1591–1596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater. 2013;29:59–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater. 2010;26:E78–E93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, et al. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:299–309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27:701–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamano N, Chiang YC, Nyamaa I, et al. Repair of silorane-based dental composites: Influence of surface treatments. Dent Mater. 2012;28:894–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar