Release of titanium after insertion of dental implants with different surface characteristics – an ex vivo animal study

References

• Long M, Rack HJ. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement-a materials science perspective]. Biomaterials. 1998;19:1621–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geetha M, Singh AK, Asokamani R, et al. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – a review [Review]. Prog Mater Sci. 2009;397–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niinomi M. Mechanical biocompatibilities of titanium alloys for biomedical applications [Review]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2008;1:30–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, et al. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1969;3:81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publ. Co. Inc.; 1985. (Quintessence books).
   Google Scholar
• Brunette DM. Titanium in medicine: material science, surface science, engineering, biological responses and medical applications. Berlin: Springer; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Steinemann SG. Titanium-the material of choice? Periodontol 2000. 1998;17:7–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong WHD, Krystek P, Nia Y, et al. WP7: toxicokinetics and tissue distribution of MNs for specification of organs at risk for genotoxicity testing. Anses Faff, environmental and occupational health safety, editor, Marc Mortureux, Director General of ANSES; 2013. Available from: Nanogenotox.eu
   Google Scholar
• Liu XY, Chu PK, Ding CX. Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng R-Rep. 2004;47:49–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977;16:1–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, et al. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;5:347–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss [Article]. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:329–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein MM, Lussi A, Schmid B, et al. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:659–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran DL, Jackson JM, Bernard JP, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter study of early loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:1324–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannizzaro G, Leone M, Consolo U, et al. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery versus conventional implants in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:867–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polizzi G, Gualini F, Friberg B. A two-center retrospective analysis of long-term clinical and radiologic data of TiUnite and turned implants placed in the same mouth. Int J Prosthodont. 2013;26:350–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokovic V, Jung R, Feloutzis A, et al. Immediate vs. early loading of SLA implants in the posterior mandible: 5-year results of randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2014;25:e114–e119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira GJ, Leite FC, Pontes AE, et al. Comparison of the primary and secondary stability of implants with anodized surfaces and implants treated by acids: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31:186–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris HF, Ochi S, Orenstein IH, et al. AICRG, Part V: factors influencing implant stability at placement and their influence on survival of Ankylos implants. J Oral Implantol. 2004;30:162–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roccuzzo M, Aglietta M, Bunino M, et al. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched implants: a randomized-controlled double-blind split-mouth study. Five-year results. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2008;19:148–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos MV, Elias CN, Cavalcanti Lima JH. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:215–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:331–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Lausmaa J. Torque and histomorphometric evaluation of c.p. titanium screws blasted with 25- and 75-microns-sized particles of Al2O3. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;30:251–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. An animal study of c.p. titanium screws with different surface topographies [Article]. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1995;6:302–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1-review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:536–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach R. Characterisation of areal surface texture. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson M, Kelk P, Belibasakis GN, et al. Titanium ions form particles that activate and execute interleukin-1β release from lipopolysaccharide-primed macrophages. J Periodont Res. 2017;52:21–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makihira S, Mine Y, Nikawa H, et al. Titanium ion induces necrosis and sensitivity to lipopolysaccharide in gingival epithelial-like cells [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Toxicol In Vitro. 2010; 24:1905–1910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makihira S, Mine Y, Kosaka E, et al. Titanium surface roughness accelerates RANKL-dependent differentiation in the osteoclast precursor cell line, RAW264.7. Dent Mater J. 2007;26:739–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachi T, Shuto T, Shinohara Y, et al. Release of titanium ions from an implant surface and their effect on cytokine production related to alveolar bone resorption. Toxicology. 2015;327:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schliephake H, Reiss G, Urban R, et al. Metal release from titanium fixtures during placement in the mandible: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:502–511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer U, Buhner M, Buchter A, et al. Fast element mapping of titanium wear around implants of different surface structures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:206–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguti J, de Oliveira F, Peres RC, et al. The role of fluoride on the process of titanium corrosion in oral cavity. Biometals. 2012;25:859–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boere G. Influence of fluoride on titanium in an acidic environment measured by polarization resistance technique. J App Biomater. 1995;6:283–288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathew MT, Abbey S, Hallab NJ, et al. Influence of pH on the tribocorrosion behavior of CpTi in the oral environment: synergistic interactions of wear and corrosion. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2012;100:1662–1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Reichl FX, Wang Y, et al. Analysis of titanium and other metals in human jawbones with dental implants – a case series study. Dent Mater. 2016;32:1042–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safioti LM, Kotsakis GA, Pozhitkov AE, et al. Increased levels of dissolved titanium are associated with peri-implantitis – a cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2017;88:436–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sul YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S, et al. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 2002;23:491–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everhart TE, Thornley RFM. Wide-band detector for micro-microampere low-energy electron currents. J Sci Instrum. 1960;37:246–248.
   Google Scholar
• Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1952;47:583–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn OJ. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics. 1964;6:241–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka N, Ichinose S, Kimijima Y, et al. Investigation of titanium leak to bone tissue surrounding dental titanium implant: electron microscopic findings and analysis by electron diffraction. Med Electron Microsc. 2000;33:96–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martini D, Fini M, Franchi M, et al. Detachment of titanium and fluorohydroxyapatite particles in unloaded endosseous implants. Biomaterials. 2003;24:1309–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flatebo RS, Hol PJ, Leknes KN, et al. Mapping of titanium particles in peri-implant oral mucosa by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and high-resolution optical darkfield microscopy. J Oral Pathol Med. 2011;40:412–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchi M, Orsini E, Martini D, et al. Destination of titanium particles detached from titanium plasma sprayed implants. Micron. 2007;38:618–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmiento-Gonzalez A, Encinar JR, Marchante-Gayon JM, et al. Titanium levels in the organs and blood of rats with a titanium implant, in the absence of wear, as determined by double-focusing ICP-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009;393:335–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez D, Gil FJ, Planell JA, et al. Titanium levels in rats implanted with Ti6Al4V treated samples in the absence of wear. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1999;10:847–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco PD, Ducheyne P, Cuckler JM. Systemic titanium levels in rabbits with a titanium implant in the absence of wear. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997; 8:525–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Goh BT, Lai SH, et al. Peri-implant and systemic release of metallic elements following insertion of a mandibular modular endoprosthesis in Macaca fascicularis. Acta Biomaterialia. 2009;5:3640–3646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisken KW, Dandie GW, Lugowski S, et al. A study of titanium release into body organs following the insertion of single threaded screw implants into the mandibles of sheep. Aust Dent J. 2002;47:214–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingart D, Steinemann S, Schilli W, et al. Titanium deposition in regional lymph nodes after insertion of titanium screw implants in maxillofacial region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;23:450–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchi M, Bacchelli B, Martini D, et al. Early detachment of titanium particles from various different surfaces of endosseous dental implants. Biomaterials. 2004;25:2239–2246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senna P, Antoninha Del Bel Cury A, Kates S, et al. Surface damage on dental implants with release of loose particles after insertion into bone. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:681–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rancourt D, Shirazi-Adl A, Drouin G, et al. Friction properties of the interface between porous-surfaced metals and tibial cancellous bone. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:1503–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dammak M, Shirazi-Adl A, Schwartz M Jr, et al. Friction properties at the bone-metal interface: comparison of four different porous metal surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;35:329–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biemond JE, Aquarius R, Verdonschot N, et al. Frictional and bone in-growth properties of engineered surface topographies produced by electron beam technology. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:711–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aerssens J, Boonen S, Joly J, et al. Variations in trabecular bone composition with anatomical site and age: potential implications for bone quality assessment. J Endocrinol. 1997;155:411–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosekilde L, Kragstrup J, Richards A. Compressive strength, ash weight, and volume of vertebral trabecular bone in experimental fluorosis in pigs. Calcif Tissue Int. 1987;40:318–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanborg LM, Andersson M, Wennerberg A. Surface characterization of commercial oral implants on the nanometer level. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2010;92:462–469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang BS, Sul YT, Oh SJ, et al. XPS, AES and SEM analysis of recent dental implants. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:2222–2229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarmar T, Palmquist A, Branemark R, et al. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res. 2008;10:11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R, Lei T, Dusevich V, et al. Surface characteristics and cell adhesion: a comparative study of four commercial dental implants. J Prosthodont. 2013;22:641–651.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aparicio C, Olive J. Comparative surface microanalysis of failed Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:94–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faucher S, Lespes G. Quantification of titanium from TiO2 particles in biological tissue. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2015;32:40–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcaen L, Bolea-Fernandez E, Resano M, et al. Accurate determination of ultra-trace levels of Ti in blood serum using ICP-MS/MS. Anal Chim Acta. 2014;809:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine BR, Hsu AR, Skipor AK, et al. Ten-year outcome of serum metal ion levels after primary total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:512–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrektsson T, Dahlin C, Jemt T, et al. Is marginal bone loss around oral implants the result of a provoked foreign body reaction? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16:155–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris WH, Schiller AL, Scholler JM, et al. Extensive localized bone resorption in the femur following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:612–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM, et al. Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled, longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1447–1458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallab NJ, Jacobs JJ. Chemokines associated with pathologic responses to orthopedic implant debris. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017;8:5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25:63–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar