Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive

References

• Staxrud F, Tveit AB, Rukke HV, et al. Repair of defective composite restorations. A questionnaire study among dentists in the Public Dental Service in Norway. J Dent. 2016;52:50–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Richman JS, DPBRN Collaborative Group, et al. How dentists diagnose and treat defective restorations: evidence from the dental practice-based research network. Oper Dent. 2009;34:664–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, et al. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites? Dent Mater. 2011;27:701–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baur V, Ilie N. Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17:601–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson ST, Tibballs J, Dahl JE. Effect of different surface treatments and adhesives on repair bond strength of resin composites after one and 12 months of storage using an improved microtensile test method. Oper Dent. 2014;39: E206–E216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinastiti M, Özcan M, Siswomihardjo W, et al. Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins. Clin Oral Invest. 2011;15:625–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Opdam NJ, et al. Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair. J Dent. 2011;39:499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Composite-composite repair bond strength: effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent. 2003;31:521–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, et al. Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. J Dent. 2010;38:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik EU, Ergücü Z, Türkün LS, et al. Tensile bond strength of an aged resin composite repaired with different protocols. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13:359–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, et al. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent. 2012;40:513–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarzadeh Kashi TS, Erfan M, Rakhshan V, et al. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Oper Dent. 2011;36:608–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL. Wear and fatigue behavior of nano-structured dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2006;78:196–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jung M, Sehr K, Klimek J. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent. 2007;32:45–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergücü Z, Türkün LS, Aladag A. Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2008;33:413–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011;119:316–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean DE, Meyers EJ, Guillory VL, et al. Enamel bond strength of new universal adhesive bonding agents. Oper Dent. 2015;40:410–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43:765–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki T, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, et al. Influence of etching mode on enamel bond durability of universal adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2016;41:520–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2016;32:e9–e21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, et al. Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatments and bonding agents. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21:251–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutlu O, Gurel P. Effect of delay in layering on the incremental adhesion of indirect dental composite resins. Int J Adhes Adhes.2012;39:15–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anusavice KJ. Philips’ science of dental materials. 10th ed. Pennsylvania: W.B. Saunders Company; 1996. p. 298–299.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson ST, Dahl JE. Effect of curing and silanizing on composite repair bond strength using an improved micro-tensile test method. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2017;3:21–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamano N, Chiang YC, Nyamaa I, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the repair strength of a nanofilled resin-based composite. Dent Mater J. 2011;30:537–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R, et al. Repair bond strength of aged resin composite after different surface and bonding treatments. Materials. 2016;9:547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sideridou ID, Karabela MM, Bikiaris DN. Aging studies of light cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins and a resin composite in water or ethanol/water. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1142–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øysaed H, Ruyter IE. Composites for use in posterior teeth: mechanical properties tested under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res. 1986;20: 261–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarumi H, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y. Relationship between particle size of barium glass filler and water sorption of light-cured composite resin. Dent Mater J. 1995;14:37–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imbery TA, Gray T, DeLatour F, et al. Evaluation of flexural, diametral tensile, and shear bond strength of composite repairs. Oper Dent. 2014;39: E250–E260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fonseca AS, Labruna Moreira AD, de Albuquerque PP, et al. Effect of monomer type on the CC degree of conversion, water sorption and solubility, and color stability of model dental composites. Dent Mater. 2017;33:394–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Yli-Urpo A, et al. Repair bond strength of restorative resin composite applied to fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004;62:51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Jian YT, Wang XD, et al. Bond strength of primer/cement systems to zirconia subjected to artificial aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:790–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baena E, Vignolo V, Fuentes MV, et al. Influence of repair procedure on composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength. Am J Dent. 2015;28:255–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza MO, Leitune VC, Rodrigues SB, et al. One-year aging effects on microtensile bond strengths of composite and repairs with different surface treatments. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Askary FS, El-Banna AH, van Noort R. Immediate vs delayed repair bond strength of a nanohybrid resin composite. J Adhes Dent. 2012; 14:265–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Silanising agents promote resin-composite repair. Int Dent J. 2015;65:311–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornazari IA, Wille I, Meda EM, et al. Effect of surface treatment, silane, and universal adhesive on microshear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. Oper Dent. 2017;42:367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar