The effect of antimicrobial additives on the properties of dental glass-ionomer cements: a review

References

• Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7:E16. doi:10.3390/jfb7030016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali H, Maroli S. Glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding agent. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13:650–654.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buck RA. Glass ionomer endodontic sealers – a literature review. Gen Dent. 2001;50:365–368.
   Google Scholar
• Hill RG, Wilson AD. Some structural aspects of glasses used in ionomer cements. Glass Technol. 1988;29:150–188.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra SB. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res. 1991;70:72–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yelamanchili A, Darvell BW. Network competition in resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1064–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Paz LC. Redefining the persistent infection in root canals; possible role of biofilm communities. J Endod. 2007;33:652–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björndal L, Larsen T. Changes in the cultivable flora in deep carious lesions following stepwise excavation procedure. Caries Res. 2000;34:502–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerheijm KL, Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, et al. Bacterial counts in carious dentine under restorations; 2-year in vivo effects, Caries Res. 1999;33:130–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto AS, Araújo FB, Franzon R, et al. Clinical and microbiological effect of calcium hydroxide protection in indirect pulp capping in primary teeth. Am J Dent. 2006;19:382–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro J, Ericson D. In vitro antibacterial effect of chlorhexidine added to glass-ionomer cements. Scand J Dent Res. 1991;99:533–540.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lui G, He H. Long-term antibacterial properties and bond strength of experimental nano silver-containing orthodontic cements. J Wuhan Univ Techno-Mater Sci Ed. 2013;28:849–855.
   Google Scholar
• Osinga PW, Grande RHM, Ballester RY, et al. Zinc sulphate addition to glass-ionomer cements: influence on physical and antibacterial properties, zinc and fluoride release. Dent Mater. 2003;19:212–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabrouk M, Selim M, Beherei H, et al. Incorporation effect of silver and zinc zeolites into commercial glass ionomer cements. Interceram. 2013;62:50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Forss H, Jokinen J, Spets-Happonen S, Seppa L, Louma H. Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque growth on glass ionomer and composite. Caries Res. 1991;25:454–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeersch G, Leloup G, Delmee M, et al. Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomers, compomers and resin composites: relationship between acidity and material setting phase. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:368–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppa L, Toppa-Saarinen E, Louma H. Effect of different glass ionomers on the acid production and electrolyte metabolism of Streptococcus mutans Ingbritt. Caries Res. 1992;26:434–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klai S, Altenburger M, Spitzmuller B, et al. Antimicrobial effects of dental luting glass ionomer cements. The Scientific World J. 2014;2014:ID807086; doi:10.1155/2014/807086.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira GLS, Freires I, Alves LA, et al. Antibacterial activity of glass ionomer cements on cariogenic bacteria – an in vitro study. Int J Dent Clin. 2011;3:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Shalav M, Fuss Z, Weiss EI. In vitro antibacterial activity of a glass ionomer endodontic sealer. J Endodod. 1997;2:616–619.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera M, Castillo A, Bravo M, et al. Antibacterial activity of resin adhesives, glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer in contact with dentin caries samples. Oper Dent. 2000;25:265–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Kaneshiro AV, et al. Antibacterial effects and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine for the ART approach. Dent Mater. 2006;22:647–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer G, Jones FH, Billington RW, et al. Chlorhexidine release from an experimental glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5423–5431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimkov A, Nicholson JW, Gjorgievska E, et al. Compressive strength and setting time determination of glass-ionomer cements incorporated with cetylypyridinium chloride and benzalkonium chloride. Contrib Sec Biol Med Sci Macedonian Acad Sci Arts. 2012;33:243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Braden M. The absorption of water by acrylic resins and other materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1964;14:307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botelho MG. Inhibitory effects on selected oral bacteria of antibacterial agents incorporated in a glass ionomer cement. Caries Res. 2003;37:108–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botelho MG. Compressive strength of glass ionomer cements with dental antibacterial agents. S Afr Dent J. 2004;59:51–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dimkov A, Gjorgievska E, Nicholson JW, Kaftandzieva A. Antibacterial effects of conventional glass ionomer cement. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2016;117:31–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartunoglu E, Öztürk F, Bilenler T, et al. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of propolis added to glass ionomer cement. Angle Orthod. 2013;84:368–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadiki JV, Jampanapalli SR, Konda S, et al. Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial properties of glass ionomer cements with and without chlorhexidine gluconate. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2016;9:99–103.
   Google Scholar
• Gjermo P. Chlorhexidine and related compounds. J Dent Res. 1989;68(Special issue):1602–1608.
   Google Scholar
• Emilson CG. Potential efficacy of chlorhexidine against mutans streptococci and dental caries. J Dent Res. 1994;73:682–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marti LM, da Mata M, Ferraz-Santos B, et al. Addition of chlorhexidine gluconate to a glass ionomer cement: a study on mechanical, physical and antibacterial properties. Braz Dent J. 2014;25:33–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duque C, Aida KL, Pereira JA, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for atraumatic restorative treatment. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25:541–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du X, Huang X, Huang C, et al. Inhibition of early biofilm formation by glass-ionomer incorporated with chlorhexidine in vivo: a pilot study. Aust Dent J. 2012;57:58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoszek A, Ericson D. In vitro fluoride release and the antibacterial effect of glass ionomers containing chlorhexidine gluconate. Oper Dent. 2008;33:696–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tüzüner T, Kuşgòz A, Er K, et al. Antibacterial activity and physical properties of conventional glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine diacetate/cetrimide mixtures. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011;23:46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmatz FM, Tüzüner T, Baygin O, et al. Antibacterial activity, surface roughness, flexural strength and solubility of conventional luting cements containing chlorhexidine diacetate/cetrimide mixtures. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110:107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkun LSE, Turkun M, Ertugrul F, et al. Long-term antibacterial effects and physical properties of a chlorhexidine-containing glass- ionomer cement. J Esthet Rest Dent. 2008;20:29–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anstice HM, Nicholson JW. Studies in the setting of polyelectrolyte materials, Part 2: The effect of organic compounds on a glass polyalkenoate cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1994;5:299–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klooster NTM, Vandertouw F, Mandel M. Solvent effects in polyelectrolyte solutions. 1. Potentiometric and viscometric titration of poly(acrylic acid) in methanol and counterion specificity Macromolecules. 1984;17:2070–2078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson JW. Studies in the setting of polyelectrolyte materials, Part 3: effect sodium salts on the setting and properties of glass polyalkenoate and zinc polycarboxylate dental cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1995;6:404–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson JW, Abiden F. Studies in the setting of polyelectrolyte materials, Part 6: the effect halides on the strength and water balance of glass polyalkenoate and zinc polycarboxylate dental cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1998;9:269–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson JW. The effect of trivalent metal nitrates on the properties of dental cements made from poly(acrylic acid). J Appl Polym Sci. 1998;70:2353–2359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tüzüner T, Ulusu T. Effect of antibacterial agents on the surface hardness of a conventional glass-ionomer cement. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20:45–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva RC, Zuanon AC, Esberard RR, et al. In vitro microhardness of glass ionomer cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18:139–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew SM, Thomas AM, Koshy G, et al. Evaluation of microleakage of chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer cement: An in vivo study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;6:7–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinheiro SL, Azenha GR, De Milito F, et al. Antimicrobial capacity of casein phosphopeptide/amorphous calcium phosphate and enzymes in glass ionomer cement in dentin carious lesions. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015;49:104–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulla Z, Edwards M, Nicholson JW. The release of sodium fusidate from glass-ionomer dental cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21:1997–2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbist L. The antimicrobial activity of fusidic acid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990;25 (Supplement B):1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collignon P, Turnidge J. Fusidic acid in vitro activity. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1999;12 (Suppl. 2):S45–S58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellington MJ, Reuter S, Harris SR, et al. Emergent and evolving antimicrobial resistance cassettes in community-associated fusidic acid and metacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;45:477–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Du X, Huang C, Fu D, Ouyang X, Wang Y. Antibacterial and physical properties of ECGC-containing glass ionomer cements. J Dent. 2013;41:927–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings MC, Minbiole KPC, Wuest WM. Quaternary ammonium compounds: an antimicrobial mainstay and platform for innovation to address bacterial resistance. ACS Infect Dis. 2015;1:288–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniam P, Girish Babu K, et al. Does the addition of Propolis to glass ionomer cement alter its physicochemical properties? An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017;41:62–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topcuoglu N, Ozan F, Ozyurt M, et al. In vitro antibacterial effects of glass-ionomer cement containing ethanolic extract of propolis on Streptococcus mutans. Eur J Dent. 2012;6:428–433.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Libério SA, Pereira ALA, Araújo MJA, et al. The potential use of propolis as a cariostatic agent and its actions on muans group streptococci. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;125:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altinsoy M, Tanriver M, Türkan U, et al. In vitro evaluation of microleakage and microhardness of ethanolic extracts of Propolis in different proportions added to glass ionomer cement. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40:136–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Tatari A, de Soet J, de Gee A, et al. Influence of salvadora persica (miswak) extract on physical and antimicrobial properties of glass ionomer cement. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2011;12:22–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kabil NS, Badran AS, Wassel. Effect of addition of chorhexidine and miswak on the clinical performance and antimicrobial properties of conventional glass ionomer: an in vivo study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27:380–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabsie F, Gregorie G, Sixou M, et al. Does strontium play a part in the cariostatic activity of glass ionomer? Strontium diffusion and antibacterial activity. J Dent. 2009;37:554–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guida A, Towler M, Wall J, et al. Preliminary work on the antibacterial effect of strontium in glass ionomer cements. J Mater Sci Lett. 2003;22:1401–1403.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone JDB, Shilds C, Khademazad B, et al. Acid reactivity of carbonated apatites with strontium and fluoride substitutions. J Dent Res. 1983;62:1049–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd D, Li H, Tanner DA, Towler MR, Wall JG. The antibacterial effects of zinc from zinc-based glass polyalkenoate cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17:489–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling M, Hill RG. Novel polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) dental cements based on zinc silicate glasses. Biomaterials. 1994;15:299–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khader BA, Curran DJ, Peel S, et al. Glass polyalkenoate cements designed for cranioplasty applications: an evaluation of their physical and mechanical properties. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7:8; doi 10.3390/jfb7020008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wren AW, Coughlan A, Hall MM, et al. Comparison of a SiO2-CaO-ZnO-SrO glass polyalkenoate cement to commercial dental materials: ion release, biocompatibility and antibacterial properties. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013;24:2255–2264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkin O, Wren A, Thornton R, et al. Antibacterial analysis of a zinc-based glass polyalkenoate cement. J Biomater Appl. 2011;26:277–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlan A, Scanlon K, Mahon BP, et al. Zinc and silver glass polyakenoate cements: an evaluation of their antibacterial nature. Biomed Mater Eng. 2010;20:99–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer W, Lippman N, Kaim J. Antimicrobial properties of glass-ionomer cements and other restorative materials. Oper Dent. 1988;14:77–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanajassun P, Nivedhitha M, Nishad N, et al. Effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles in combination with conventional glass ionomer cement: in vitro study. Adv Hum Biol. 2014;4:31.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia PPNS, Cardia MFB, Francisconi RS, et al. Antibacterial activity of glass ionomer cement modified by zinc oxide nanoparticles. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80:456–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, He H. Long-term antibacterial properties and bond strength of experimental nano silver-containing orthodontic cements. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci Ed,. 2013;28:849–855.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang YH, Sun JS, Huang YC, Lu CH, Chang WHS, Wang CC. Studies of photo killing bacteria using titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Artif Organs. 2008;2008:167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Gjorgievska ES, van Tendaloo G, Nicholson JW, et al. The incorporation of nano-particles into conventional glass ionomer dental restorative cements. Microsc Microanal. 2015;21:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidambe AT. Biocompatibility of advanced manufactured titanium implants – a review. Materials. 2014;7:8168–8188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders BJ, Gregory RL, Moore K, et al. Antibacterial and physical properties of resin-modified glass-ionomers combined with chlorhexidine. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:553–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castilho ARF, Duque C, Negrini TC, et al. In vitro and in vivo investigation of the biological and mechanical behaviour of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine. J Dent. 2013;41:155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell AD. Chlorhexidine: antibacterial action and bacterial resistance. Infection. 1986;14:212–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12:147–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimkov A, Panovski N, Stevanovic M, et al. Effects of cetylpyridinium chloride in overall cariogenic salivary micro flora reduction. Balk J Stom. 2006;10:115–121.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlovsky A, Sintov A, Moldovan M, et al. Inhibition of plaque formation by local application of a degradable controlled release system containing cetylpyridinium chloride. J Clin Periodontol. 1994;21:32–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandulkar M, Oh S, Tezel U, et al. Long-term exposure to benzalkonium chloride disinfectants results in charge of microbial community structure and increased antimicrobial resistance. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:9730–9738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezel U, Pavlostathis SG. Quaternary ammonium disinfectants: microbial adaption, degradation and ecology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015;33:296–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffet-Bataillon S, Tattevin P, et al. Efflux pump induction by quaternary ammonium compounds and fluoroquinoline resistance in bacteria. Future Microbiol. 2016;11:81–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegstad K, Langsrud S, Lunestrad BT, et al. Does the wide use of quaternary ammonium compounds enhance the selection and spread of antimicrobial resistance and thus threaten our health? Microb Drug Resist. 2010;16:91–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone JDB. Dental caries: a dynamic disease process. Aust Dent J. 2008;53:286–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leistevno J, Jarvinen H, Osterblad M, et al. Resistance to mercury and antimicrobial agents in Streptococcus mutans isolates from human subjects in relation to exposure to dental amalgam fillings. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:456–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao Y, Brandt BW, Li J, et al. Fluoride resistance in Streptococcus mutans: a mini review. J Oral Microbiol. 2017;9: article 1344509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa H, Izutani N, Kitagawa R, et al. Evolution of resistance to cationic biocides in Streptococcus mutans and Enterococcus faecalis. J Dent. 2016;47:18–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath RJ, Rubin JR, Holland DR, et al. Mechanism of triclosan inhibition of bacterial fatty acid synthesis. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:11110–11114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdankhah SP, Schele AA, Holby EA, et al. Triclosan and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria: an overview. Microb Drug Resist. 2006;12:83–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar