References
- Anderson, K. (2009). Targeted killing in U.S. counterterrorism strategy and law (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1415070). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
- Best, J. (2012). Bureaucratic ambiguity. Economy and Society, 41, 84–106. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.637333
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). Force of law: Toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal, 38, 805–853. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/hastlj38&div=33&id=&page=
- Brennan, J. (2012). The efficacy and ethics of U.S. counterterrorism strategy. Retrieved from http://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/the-efficacy-and-ethics-us-counterterrorism-strategy
- Bureau of Investigative Journalism (2015). Get the Data: Drone Wars. Retrieved from https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/category/projects/drones/drones-graphs/
- Byers, M. (1999). Custom, power, and the power of rules: International relations and customary international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Chan, P. C. (2004). Acquiescence/estoppel in international boundaries: Temple of Preah Vihear revisited. Chinese Journal of International Law, 3, 421–439. Retrieved from http://chinesejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/3/2/421.short doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000527
- Clayman, S. E. (2001). Answers and evasions. Language in Society, 30, 403–442. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=92883&fileId=S0047404501003037
- Corten, O. (2010). The law against war: The prohibition on the use of force in contemporary international law. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing.
- Council of the European Union. (2004, March 22). Council conclusions on assassination of Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, 2572nd council meeting, Brussels (7383/04 Presse 80).
- D'Amato, A. A. (1971). The concept of custom in international law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- D'Aspremont, J. (2012). Wording in international law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 25, 575–602. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/10.1017/S0922156512000283
- Downes, C. (2004). “Targeted killings” in an age of terror: The legality of the Yemen strike. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 9, 277–294. doi: 10.1093/jcsl/9.2.277
- Dworkin, A. (2013, July). Drones and targeted killing: Defining a European position (European Council on Foreign Relations policy brief). Retrieved from http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR84_DRONES_BRIEF.pdf
- European Parliament. (2014). Resolution 2014/2567 (RSP).
- Garwood-Gowers, A. (2011). Israel's airstrike on Syria's Al-Kibar facility: A test case for the doctrine of pre-emptive self-defence? Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 16, 263–291. Retrieved from: http://jcsl.oxfordjournals.org/content/16/2/263.short doi: 10.1093/jcsl/krr011
- Gray, C. (2011). President Obama's 2010 United States national security strategy and international law on the use of force. Chinese Journal of International Law, 10(1), 35–53. Retrieved from http://chinesejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/10/1/35.short doi: 10.1093/chinesejil/jmr005
- Greenberg, J. (2001, July 5). Israel affirms policy of assassinating militants. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/05/world/israel-affirms-policy-of-assassinating-militants.html
- Kammerhofer, J. (2004). Uncertainty in the formal sources of international law: Customary international law and some of its problems. European Journal of International Law 15, 523–553. doi:10.1093/ejil/15.3.523
- Krasmann, S. (2012). Targeted killing and its law: On a mutually constitutive relationship. Leiden Journal of International Law, 25, 665–682. doi:10.1017/S0922156512000337
- Kurzon, D. (1995). The right of silence: A socio-pragmatic model of interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(1), 55–69. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037821669400036E doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(94)00036-E
- Leander, A. (2013). Technological agency in the co-constitution of legal expertise and the US drone program. Leiden Journal of International Law, 26, 811–831. doi:10.1017/S0922156513000423
- MacLure, M., Holmes, R., Jones, L., & MacRae, C. (2010). Silence as resistance to analysis: Or on not opening one's mouth properly. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 492–500. doi: 10.1177/1077800410364349
- Mendelson, M. (1996). The subjective element in customary international law. British Yearbook of International Law, 66(1), 177–208. doi: 10.1093/bybil/66.1.177
- Murphy, S. D. (2009). International legality of US military cross-border operations from Afghanistan into Pakistan. International Law Studies (U.S. Naval War College), 85, 109–139. Retrieved from https://www.usnwc.edu/Research–Gaming/International-Law/New-International-Law-Studies-%28Blue-Book%29-Series/International-Law-Blue-Book-Articles.aspx?Volume=85
- O'Connell, M. E. (2010). Remarks: The resort to drones under international law. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 39, 585–600. Retrieved from http://heinonlinebackup.com/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/denilp39§ion=28.
- Reinold, T. (2011). State weakness, irregular warfare, and the right to self-defense post-9/11. American Journal of International Law, 105, 244–286. doi: 10.5305/amerjintelaw.105.2.0244
- Sbisà, M. (2002). Speech acts in context. Language & Communication, 22(4), 421–436. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(02)00018-6
- Schröter, M. (2013). Silence and concealment in political discourse: Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture (DAPSAC). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Tams, C. J. (2009). The use of force against terrorists. European Journal of International Law, 20, 359–397. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chp031
- Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Van Raemdonck, N. (2012). Vested interest or moral indecisiveness? Explaining the EU's silence on the US targeted killing policy in Pakistan. Istituto Affari Internazionali. Working Paper 12.
- Villiger, M. E. (1985). Customary international law and treaties: A study of their interactions and interrelations, with special consideration of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Dordrecht: Matthias Nijhoff Publishers.
- White House, The. (2013). Fact sheet: U.S. policy standards and procedures for the use of force in counterterrorism operations outside the United States and areas of active hostilities. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/fact-sheet-us-policy-standards-and-procedures-use-force-counterterrorism