References
- Ambos, K. (2018). European criminal law. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Biasiotti, M.-A. (2017). A proposed electronic evidence exchange across the European Union. Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review, 14, 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v14i0.2337
- Böse, M. (2018). An assessment of the Commission’s proposals on electronic evidence. Study commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the LIBE Committee. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2018)604989
- Buono, L. (2016). Fighting cybercrime between legal challenges and practical difficulties: EU and national approaches. ERA Forum, 17, 343–353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-016-0432-5
- Buono, L. (2019). The genesis of the European Union’s new proposed legal instrument(s) on e-evidence. Towards the EU Production and Preservation Orders. ERA Forum, 19, 307–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-018-0525-4
- Burchard, C. (2019). Europäische E-Evidence-Verordnung. Rechtsstaatlich defizitär, der Realität hinterher und langfristig konträr zu europäischen Interessen. ZRP, 52, 164–167.
- Christakis, T. (2020). E-Evidence in the EU Parliament: Basic Features of Birgit Sippel’s Draft Report. European Law Blog. https://europeanlawblog.eu/2020/01/21/e-evidence-in-the-eu-parliament-basic-features-of-birgit-sippels-draft-report/
- CJEU. (2014). Digital Rights Ireland and Seitlinger and others, Joined Cases C-293/12 and C-594/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:238.
- CJEU. (2016). Tele2 Sverige and Watson, Joined Cases C-203/15 and C-698/15, ECLI:EU:C:2016:970.
- CJEU. (2020). Privacy International v. Secretary for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, Case C-623/17, ECLI:EU:C:2020:790.
- CJEU. (2020). Quadrature du Net and Others v. Premier ministre and Others, Joined Cases C-511/18, C-512/18 and C-520/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:791.
- Clough, J. (2015). Principles of cybercrime (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- CoE Cybercrime Convention Committee. (2021). Second additional protocol to the convention on cybercrime on enhanced cooperation and disclosure of electronic evidence. Draft Protocol version 2. https://rm.coe.int/2nd-additional-protocol-budapest-convention-en/1680a2219c
- Depauw, S. (2018). Electronic evidence in criminal matters: How about e-evidence instruments 2.0? European Criminal Law Review, 8(1), 62–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2018-1-62
- Directive 2014/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32014L0041
- EDRi. (2018). EU “e-evidence” proposals turn service providers into judicial authorities. https://edri.org/our-work/eu-e-evidence-proposals-turn-service-providers-into-judicial-authorities/
- EDRi. (2020). “E-evidence”: Mixed results in the European Parliament. https://edri.org/our-work/e-evidence-mixed-results/
- European Commission. (2015). The European Agenda on Security. COM(2015) 185 final. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/default/files/e-library/documents/basic-documents/docs/eu_agenda_on_security_en.pdf
- European Commission. (2016). Non-paper: Progress Report following the Conclusions of the Council of the European Union on Improving Criminal Justice in Cyberspace. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15072-2016-REV-1/en/pdf
- European Commission. (2017). Non-paper from the Commission services. Improving cross-border access to electronic evidence: Findings from the expert process and suggested way forward. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/default/files/docs/pages/20170522_non-paper_electronic_evidence_en.pdf
- European Commission. (2018a). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters. COM(2018) 225 final – 2018/0108 (COD). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A225%3AFIN
- European Commission. (2018b). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering evidence in criminal proceedings. COM(2018) 226 final – 2018/0107 (COD). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018PC0226
- European Commission. (2018c). Impact Assessment accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters and Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering evidence in criminal proceedings. SWD(2018) 118 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1524129550845&uri=SWD:2018:118:FIN
- European Commission. (2019a). Recommendation for a Council Decision authorising the participation in negotiations on a second Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime (CETS No. 185). COM(2019) 71 final. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/recommendation_budapest_convention.pdf
- European Commission. (2019b). Recommendation for a Council Decision authorising the opening of negotiations in view of an agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on cross-border access to electronic evidence for judicial cooperation in criminal matters. COM(2019) 70 final. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/recommendation_council_decision_eu_us_e-evidence.pdf
- European Commission. (2020a). A Counter-Terrorism Agenda for the EU: Anticipate, prevent, protect, respond. COM(2020) 795 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=COM:2020:795:FIN
- European Commission. (2020b). EU Security Union Strategy. COM(2020) 605 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0605
- European Commission. (2020c). The EU’s cybersecurity strategy for the digital decade. JOIN(2020) 18 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ga/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020JC0018
- European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts. COM(2021) 206 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/?uri=COM:2021:206:FIN
- European Council. (2016a). Joint statement of EU Ministers for Justice and Home Affairs and representatives of EU institutions on the terrorist attacks in Brussels on 22 March 2016. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/03/24/statement-on-terrorist-attacks-in-brussels-on-22-march/
- European Council. (2016b). Council conclusions on improving criminal justice in cyberspace. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/24300/cyberspace-en.pdf
- European Council. (2017a). European Council meeting (22 and 23 June 2017) – Conclusions. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/23985/22-23-euco-final-conclusions.pdf
- European Council. (2017b). Council Conclusions on the Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council: Resilience, deterrence and defence: Building strong cybersecurity for the EU. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/31666/st14435en17.pdf
- European Council. (2018). Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European production and preservation orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters – General approach. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15020-2018-INIT/en/pdf
- European Data Protection Board. (2018). Opinion 23/2018 on Commission proposals on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters (Art. 70.1.b). https://edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/opinion-art-70/opinion-232018-commission-proposals-european-production_en
- European Data Protection Supervisor. (2019). Opinion on proposals regarding European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters. https://edps.europa.eu/sites/default/files/publication/19-11-06_opinion_on_e_evidence_proposals_en.pdf
- European Judicial Network’s Working Group on E-Evidence. (2021). Conclusions of the 4th online meeting on the Proposal for a Regulation on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters. https://www.statewatch.org/media/1867/eu-council-ejn-e-evidence-ep-position-paper-6035-21.pdf
- European Parliament. (2020). Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters (COM(2018)0225 – C8-0155/2018–2018/0108 (COD)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0256_EN.pdf
- European Parliament. Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. (2019). Draft report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Production and Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal matters (COM(2018)0225 – C8-0155/2018–2018/0108 (COD)). Rapporteur: Birgit Sippel. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-642987_EN.pdf
- Europol. (2020). Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment. https://www.europol.europa.eu/activities-services/main-reports/internet-organised-crime-threat-assessment
- Kaunert, K., & Léonard, S. (2019). The collective securitisation of terrorism in the European Union. West European Politics, 42(2), 261–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1510194
- Kleijssen, J., & Perri, P. (2016). Cybercrime, evidence and territoriality: Issues and options. In M. Kuijer & W. Werner (Eds.), Netherlands yearbook of international law (pp. 147–173). The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.
- Mitsilegas, V. (2018). The privatisation of mutual trust in Europe’s area of criminal justice: The case of e-evidence. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 25(3), 263–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X18792240
- Quattrocolo, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence, computational modeling and criminal proceedings. A framework for a European Legal Discussion. Cham: Springer.
- Smuha, N. (2018). Towards the EU harmonization of access to cross-border e-evidence: Challenges for fundamental rights & consistency. European Criminal Law Review, 8(1), 83–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2018-1-83
- Tinoco-Pastrana, A. (2020). The proposal on electronic evidence in the European Union. Eucrim, 1, 46–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2020-004
- Tosza, S. (2020). All evidence is equal, but electronic evidence is more equal than any other: The relationship between the European Investigation Order and the European Production Order. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 11(2), 161–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284420919802
- Vazquez Maymir, S. (2020). Anchoring the need to revise cross-border access to e-evidence. Internet Policy Review, 9(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.3.1495
- Wahl, T. (2021). New E-evidence legislation: Trilogue started – Criticism on EP stance. Eucrim. https://eucrim.eu/news/new-e-evidence-legislation-trilogue-started-critics-on-ep-stance/