Designing across map use contexts: a research agenda

References

• Abowd, G., Dey, A., Brown, P., Davies, N., Smith, M., & Steggles, P. (1999). Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In H.-W. Gellersen (Ed.), Handheld and ubiquitous computing (pp. 304–307). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/3-540-48157-5_29
   Google Scholar
• Abowd, G., & Mynatt, E. (2000). Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 7(1), 29–58. doi: 10.1145/344949.344988
   Google Scholar
• An, S. M., Lee, H.-Y., Kim, B., Yi, C.-Y., Eum, J.-H., & Woo, J.-H. (2014). Geospatial spreadsheets with microscale air quality visualization and synchronization for supporting multiple-scenario visual collaboration. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(12), 2511–2532. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2014.938077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G., Fuchs, G., & Jankowski, P. (2016). Scalable and privacy-respectful interactive discovery of place semantics from human mobility traces. Information Visualization, 15(2), 117–153. doi: 10.1177/1473871615581216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aporta, C., & Higgs, E. (2005). Satellite culture: Global positioning systems, inuit wayfinding, and the need for a new account of technology. Current Anthropology, 46(5), 729–753. doi: 10.1086/432651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M., Hudson-Smith, A., Milton, R., & Crooks, A. (2010). Map mashups, Web 2.0, and the GIS revolution. Annals of GIS, 16(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/19475681003700831
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, J., Newman, M., & Kientz, J. (2014). Thinking about context: Design practices for information architecture with context-aware systems. In M. Kindling & E. Greifeneder (Eds.), iConference 2014 Proceedings (pp. 398–411). IL: iSchools. doi: 10.9776/14116
   Google Scholar
• Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2004). Designing interaction, not interfaces. Paper presented at AVI ‘04 proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces (pp. 15–22). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/989863.989865
   Google Scholar
• Benisch, M., Kelley, P., Sadeh, N., & Cranor, L. (2011). Capturing location-privacy preferences: Quantifying accuracy and user-burden tradeoffs. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15(7), 679–694. doi: 10.1007/s00779-010-0346-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatt, A. J. (2015). The benefits and risks of volunteered geographic information. Journal of Map and Geography Libraries, 11(1), 99–104. doi: 10.1080/15420353.2015.1009609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Board, C. (1978). Map reading tasks appropriate in experimental studies in cartographic communication. The Canadian Cartographer, 15(1), 1–12. doi: 10.3138/AG15-V252-3726-W346
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, C. A., & Buttenfield, B. P. (2007). Framing guidelines for multi-scale map design using databases at multiple resolutions. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1559/152304007780279078
   Google Scholar
• Brock, A. (2013). Touch the map! Designing interactive maps for visually impaired people. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 105, 9–14. doi: 10.1145/2444800.2444802
   Google Scholar
• Brock, A., Truillet, P., Oriola, B., & Jouffrais, C. (2014). Making gestural interaction accessible to visually impaired people. In M. Auvray & C. Duriez (Eds.), Haptics: Neuroscience, devices, modeling, and applications (pp. 41–48). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44196-1_6
   Google Scholar
• Brock, A. M., Truillet, P., Oriola, B., Picard, D., & Jouffrais, C. (2015). Interactivity improves usability of geographic maps for visually impaired people. Human–Computer Interaction, 30(2), 156–194. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2014.924412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Alsakran, J., Barlowe, S., Yang, J., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Supporting effective common ground construction in asynchronous collaborative visual analytics. In S. Miksch & M. Ward (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE conference on visual analytics science and technology (pp. 101–110). Providence, RI: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/VAST.2011.6102447
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Atwood, M. (2007). Context-centered design: Bridging the gap between understanding and designing. In J. A. Jacko (Ed.), Human–computer interaction. Interaction design and usability (pp. 40–48). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-73105-4_5
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C. (1995). Tasks and task descriptions for GIS. In T. L. Nyerges, D. M. Mark, R. Laurini, & M. J. Egenhofer (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of human–computer interaction for geographic information systems (pp. 327–341). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-0103-5_23
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C., Fabrikant, S. I., & Hegarty, M. (2015). Towards empirically verified cartographic displays. In J. Szalma, M. Scerbo, P. Hancock, R. Parasuraman, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of applied perception research (pp. 711–729). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511973017.043
   Google Scholar
• Dillemuth, J. (2005). Map design evaluation for mobile display. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32(4), 285–301. doi: 10.1559/152304005775194773
   Google Scholar
• Donalek, C., Djorgovski, S. G., Cioc, A., Wang, A., Zhang, J., Lawler, E., … Longo, G. (2014). Immersive and collaborative data visualization using virtual reality platforms. Paper presented at proceedings of the 2014 IEEE international conference on big data (pp. 609–614). Washington, DC: IEEE. doi:10.1109/BigData.2014.7004282
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(1), 19–30. doi: 10.1007/s00779-003-0253-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2011). Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum, 42(1), 6–15. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrikant, S. I., Christophe, S., Papastefanou, G., & Maggi, S. (2012). Emotional response to map design aesthetics. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 7th international conference on geographical information science, Vienna (pp. 18–21).
   Google Scholar
• Fabrikant, S. I., Rebich-Hespanha, S., Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G., & Montello, D. R. (2008). Novel method to measure inference affordance in static small-multiple map displays representing dynamic processes. The Cartographic Journal, 45(3), 201–215. doi: 10.1179/000870408X311396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foerster, T., Stoter, J., & van Oosterom, P. (2012). On-demand base maps on the web generalized according to user profiles. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(1), 99–121. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2011.574292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frei, P., Richter, K.-F., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2016, September 27–30). Stress supports spatial knowledge acquisition during wayfinding with mobile maps. In J. Miller, D. O’Sullivan, N. Wiegand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international conference on geographic information science, Montreal, Canada (pp. 100–103).
   Google Scholar
• Gardony, A. L., Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2013). How navigational aids impair spatial memory: Evidence for divided attention. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 13(4), 319–350. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2013.792821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow, R. E., Vinson, C., Chambers, D., Khoury, M. J., Kaplan, R. M., & Hunter, C. (2012). National institutes of health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: Current and future directions. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1274–1281. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221. doi: 10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M., Hale, S., & Stephens, M. (2012). Featured graphic: Digital divide: The geography of internet access. Environment and Planning A, 44(5), 1009–1010. doi: 10.1068/a44497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S. (2001). Context as a dynamic construct. Human–Computer Interaction, 16(2), 257–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327051HCI16234_09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. L., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2012). More maps, more users, more devices means more cartographic challenges. The Cartographic Journal, 49(4), 298–301. doi: 10.1179/0008704112Z.00000000049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. L., & McQuoid, J. (2012). At the intersection of maps and emotion: The challenge of spatially representing experience. Kartographische Nachrichten, 62(6), 291–299.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. L., & Montello, D. R. (2015). Vision and discrimination. In M. Monmonier (Ed.), The history of cartography, Volume 6: Cartography in the twentieth century (pp. 1055–1059). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajizadeh, A. H., Tory, M., & Leung, R. (2013). Supporting awareness through collaborative brushing and linking of tabular data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2189–2197. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2013.197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrie, L., Sarjakoski, L. T., & Lehto, L. (2002). A variable-scale map for small-display cartography. International Archives of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 34(4), 237–242. doi: 10.1.1.222.3754
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M., Smallman, H. S., Stull, A. T., & Canham, M. S. (2009). Naïve cartography: How intuitions about display configuration can hurt performance. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 44(3), 171–186. doi: 10.3138/carto.44.3.171
   Google Scholar
• Hernández, N., Jiménez, P., Bergasa, L. M., Parra, I., Garcia, I., Ocaña, M., … Sevillano, M. (2011). Assessment of distractions inferred by in-vehicle information systems on a naturalistic simulator. Paper presented at 14th International IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems (pp. 1279–1284). Washington, DC: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ITSC.2011.6082886
   Google Scholar
• Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 47–63. doi: 10.21061/jte.v9i1.a.4
   Google Scholar
• Howard, G., Blick, G., & McNamara, F. (2009). A truly automated system for New Zealand’s topographic maps. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 24th international cartographic conference (p. 16). Retrieved from http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2009/html/nonref/1_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., Schmidt, M., & Gartner, G. (2012). Spatial knowledge acquisition with mobile maps, augmented reality and voice in the context of GPS-based pedestrian navigation: Results from a field test. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 39(2), 107–116. doi: 10.1559/15230406392107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenberg, P., Elmqvist, N., Scholtz, J., Cernea, D., Ma, K.-L., & Hagen, H. (2011). Collaborative visualization: Definition, challenges, and research agenda. Information Visualization, 10(4), 310–326. doi: 10.1177/1473871611412817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, T., Fujiwara, H., Imai, O., & Okabe, A. (2008). Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, H. (2008). The power of visual material: Persuasion, emotion and identification. Diogenes, 55(1), 84–93. doi: 10.1177/0392192107087919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. E., Haklay, M., Griffiths, S., & Vaughan, L. (2009). A less-is-more approach to geovisualization-enhancing knowledge construction across multidisciplinary teams. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(8), 1077–1093. doi: 10.1080/13658810802705723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keehner, M., Hegarty, M., Cohen, C., Khooshabeh, P., & Montello, D. R. (2008). Spatial reasoning with external visualizations: What matters is what you see, not whether you interact. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32(7), 1099–1132. doi: 10.1080/03640210801898177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P., Putto, K., Gyselinck, V., Krause, C. M., & Sarjakoski, L. T. (2015). Perception and recall of landmarks for personal navigation in nature at night versus day. In J. Brus, A. Vondrakova, & V. Vozenilek (Eds.), Trends in modern cartography, lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (pp. 281–301). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07926-4_22
   Google Scholar
• Kounadi, O., Bowers, K., & Leitner, M. (2015). Crime mapping on-line: Public perception of privacy issues. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 21(1), 167–190. doi: 10.1007/s10610-014-9248-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krygier, J. B. (1994). Sound and geographic visualization. In D. R. F. Taylor & A. M. MacEachren (Eds.), Visualization in modern cartography (pp. 149–166). Oxford: Pergamon Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-042415-6.50015-6
   Google Scholar
• Kveladze, I., Kraak, M.-J., & Van Elzakker, C. P. J. M. (2015). The space–time cube as part of a GeoVisual analytics environment to support the understanding of movement data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(11), 2001–2016. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2015.1058386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 261–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03352.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M. M., & Lobben, A. K. (2011). The design of tactile thematic symbols. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(10), 681–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, R. E., & Bunch, R. L. (2005). Individual differences in map reading spatial abilities using perceptual and memory processes. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32(1), 33–46. doi: 10.1559/1523040053270774
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, R. E., & Bunch, R. L. (2008). Explaining map-reading performance efficiency: Gender, memory, and geographic information. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 35(3), 171–202. doi: 10.1559/152304008784864677
   Google Scholar
• Lobben, A., & Lawrence, M. (2012). The use of environmental features on tactile maps by navigators who are blind. The Professional Geographer, 64(1), 95–108. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2011.595619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. M., Golledge, R. G., & Klatzky, R. L. (1998). Navigation system for the blind: Auditory display modes and guidance. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(2), 193–203. doi: 10.1162/105474698565677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacAoidh, E., Bertolotto, M., & Wilson, D. C. (2008). Understanding geospatial interests by visualising map interaction behaviour. Information Visualization, 7(3–4), 275–286. doi: 10.1057/ivs.2008.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacAoidh, E., Bertolotto, M., & Wilson, D. C. (2012). Towards dynamic behavior-based profiling for reducing spatial information overload in map browsing activity. Geoinformatica, 16(3), 409–434. doi: 10.1007/s10707-011-0137-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. (1995). How maps work: Representation, visualization, and design. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. (2000). Cartography and GIS: Facilitating collaboration. Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 445–456. doi: 10.1191/030913200701540528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. (2001). Cartography and GIS: Extending collaborative tools to support virtual teams. Progress in Human Geography, 25(3), 431–444. doi: 10.1191/030913201680191763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M., Gahegan, M., Pike, W., Brewer I., Cai G., Lengerich E., & Hardistry F. (2004). Geovisualization for knowledge construction and decision support. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 24(1), 13–17. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2004.1255801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggi, S., Fabrikant, S. I., Imbert, J.-P., & Hurter, C. (2016). How do display design and user characteristics matter in animations? An empirical study with air traffic control displays. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 51(1), 25–37. doi: 10.3138/cart.51.1.3176
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(8), 4398–4403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.070039597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahyar, N., Sarvghad, A., & Tory, M. (2010). A closer look at note taking in the co-located collaborative visual analytics process. In A. M. Maceachren & S. Miksch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE symposium on visual analytics science and technology (VAST) (pp. 171–178). Salt Lake City, UT: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/VAST.2010.5652879
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, C., Tollmar, K., Brewster, S., Sarjakoski, T., Sarjakoski, T., & Roselier, S. (2009). Exploring future challenges for haptic, audio and visual interfaces for mobile maps and location based services. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on location and the web (p. 8). doi:10.1145/1507136.1507144
   Google Scholar
• Medhi, I., Sagar, A., & Toyama, K. (2006). Text-free user interfaces for illiterate and semi-literate users. In K. Toyama (Ed.), International conference on information and communication technologies and development (pp. 72–82). Berkeley, CA: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICTD.2006.301841
   Google Scholar
• Meng, L. (2005). Egocentric design of map-based mobile services. The Cartographic Journal, 42(2), 5–13. doi: 10.1179/000870405X57275
   Google Scholar
• Moellering, H. (2012). The International Cartographic Association research agenda: Review, perspectives, comments, and recommendations. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 39(1), 61–68. doi: 10.1559/1523040639161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monmonier, M. (2003). The Internet, cartographic surveillance, and locational privacy. In M. P. Peterson (Ed.), Maps and the internet (pp. 97–113). Oxford: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-008044201-3/50008-6
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. (2009). Cognitive research in GIScience: Recent achievements and future prospects. Geography Compass, 3(5), 1824–1840. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00273.x
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R., Lovelace, K. L., Golledge, R. G., & Self, C. M. (1999). Sex-related differences and similarities in geographic and environmental spatial abilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 515–534. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nivala, A., & Sarjakoski, L. T. (2003, September 8). An approach to intelligent maps: Context awareness. Paper presented in the workshop on “HCI in Mobile Guides”, Udine.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, J. M., & Brewer, C. A. (1997). An evaluation of color selections to accommodate map users with color-vision impairments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87(1), 103–134. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, H. (2013). Science and intuition: Do both have a place in clinical decision making? British Journal of Nursing, 22(4), 212–215. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2013.22.4.212
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petchenik, B. B. (1983). A map maker’s perspective on map design research 1950–1980. In D. R. F. Taylor (Ed.), Graphic communication and design in contemporary cartography (pp. 37–68). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pfefferkorn, C., Burr, D., Harrison, D., Heckman, B., Oresky, C., Rothermel, J. (1985). ACES: A cartographic expert system. Paper presented at the Auto-Carto 7 Proceedings (pp. 399–407). Washington, DC: ASPRS & ACSM.
   Google Scholar
• Prasanna, R., Yang, L., & King, M. (2013). Human–computer interaction for supporting fire emergency first responders. In P. James, C. Hudson, S. Carroll-Bell, & A. Taing (Eds.), Proceedings of the people and the planet 2013 conference: Transforming the future, Melbourne. Retrieved from http://global-cities.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Human-Computer-Interaction-for-Supporting-Fire-Emergency-First-Responders.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raubal, M., & Panov, I. (2009). A formal model for map adaptation. In G. Gartner & K. Rehrl. (Eds.), Location based services and telecartography II, from sensor fusion to context models, lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (pp. 11–34). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-87393-8_2
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbacher, T. (2003). Adaptive methods for mobile cartography. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 21st international cartographic conference (pp. 1311–1321). Durban: CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbacher, T., Crease, P., & De Sabbata, S. (2009). The concept of geographic relevance. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 6th international symposium on LBS & TeleCartography, Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbacher, T., De Sabbata, S., Purves, R. S., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2016). Assessing geographic relevance for mobile search: A computational model and its validation via crowd sourcing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2620–2634. doi: 10.1002/asi.23625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, G., Ebert, D., Eick, S., Keim, D., & Joy, K. (2009). Scale and complexity in visual analytics. Information Visualization, 8(4), 247–253. doi: 10.1057/ivs.2009.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. C., Demšar, U., Moore, A. B., Buckley, A., Jiang, B., Field, K.,  … Sluter, C. R. (2017). Big data and cartography: Research challenges and opportunities for making maps that matter. International Journal of Cartography. doi: 10.1080/23729333.2016.1278151
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2009). The impact of user expertise on geographic risk assessment under uncertain conditions. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 36(1), 29–43. doi: 10.1559/152304009787340160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2012). Cartographic interaction primitives: Framework and synthesis. The Cartographic Journal, 49(4), 376–395. doi: 10.1179/1743277412Y.0000000019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruecker, S., Radzikowska, M., & Sinclair, S. (2011). Visual interface design for digital cultural heritage: A guide to rich-prospect browsing. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sarjakoski, L. T., & Sarjakoski, T. (2008). User interfaces and adaptive maps. In S. Shekhar & H. Xiong (Eds.), Encyclopedia of GIS (pp. 1205–1212), New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichtmann, H. (2009). Overview of the semiotics of maps. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 24th international cartographic conference (p. 12). Retrieved from http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2009/html/refer/30_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytical reasoning. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 55–72). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (1996). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. Paper presented at the proceedings of the IEEE symposium on visual languages (pp. 336–343). Boulder, CO: IEEE. doi:10.1109/VL.1996.545307
   Google Scholar
• SILC. (2016). Tests and instruments. Retrieved from http://ww.silccenter.org/index.php/resources/testsainstruments
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, T. A., Blok, C., Jiang, B., Koussoulakou, A., Montello, D. R., Fuhrmann, S., & Hedley, N. R. (2001). Cognitive and usability issues in geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28(1), 61–75. doi: 10.1559/152304001782173998
   Google Scholar
• Stefanidis, A., Crooks, A., & Radzikowski, J. (2013). Harvesting ambient geospatial information from social media feeds. GeoJournal, 78(2), 319–338. doi: 10.1007/s10708-011-9438-2
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, M., Vitos, M., Altenbuchner, J., Conquest, G., Lewis, J., & Haklay, M. (2013). Introducing Sapelli: A mobile data collection platform for non-literate users. Paper presented at the fourth annual symposium on computing for development (ACM DEV-4), Cape Town. doi:10.1145/2537052.2537069
   Google Scholar
• Thoresen, J. C., Francelet, R., Çöltekin, A., Richter, K-F., Fabrikant, S. I., Sandi, C. (2016). Not all anxious individuals get lost: Trait anxiety and mental rotation ability interact to explain performance in map-based route learning in men. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 132, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolochko, R. C. (2016). Contemporary professional practices in interactive web map design (Unpublished master’s thesis). Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaszewski, B. (2008). Producing geo-historical context from implicit sources: A geovisual analytics approach. The Cartographic Journal, 45(3), 165–181. doi: 10.1179/000870408X311369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaszewski, B., & MacEachren, A. M. (2012). Geovisual analytics to support crisis management: Information foraging for geo-historical context. Information Visualization, 11(4), 339–359. doi: 10.1177/1473871612456122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tory, M., & Carpendale, S. (2015). Personal visualization and personal visual analytics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 35(4), 26–27. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2015.88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. doi: 10.1037/a0028446
   Google Scholar
• Virrantaus, K., Fairbairn, D., & Kraak, M.-J. (2009). ICA research agenda on cartography and GIScience. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 36(2), 209–222. doi: 10.1559/152304009788188772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitos, M., Lewis, J., Stevens, M., & Haklay, M. (2013). Making local knowledge matter: Supporting non-literate people to monitor poaching in Congo. Paper presented at the third annual symposium on computing for development (ACM DEV 2013), Bangalore. doi:10.1145/2442882.2442884
   Google Scholar
• White, T. (2015, April 21). User assessment methods in cartographic experiment design. Paper presented at the Association of American Geographers Annual Meeting, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkening, J., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2011). The effect of gender and spatial abilities on map use preferences and performance in road selection tasks. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 25th international cartographic conference (p. 10). Retrieved from http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2011/Oral%20Presentations%20PDF/C2-Mapping%20network%20and%20route/CO-232.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Woollett, K., & Maguire, E. A. (2011). Acquiring “the knowledge” of London’s layout drives structural brain changes. Current Biology, 21(24), 2109–2114. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, A., Convertino, G., Ganoe, C., Carroll, J. M., & Zhang, X. (2013). Supporting collaborative sense-making in emergency management through geo-visualization. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 71(1), 4–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar