The political economy of spatial data infrastructures

References

• Annoni, A. (2011). INSPIRE and the digital agenda for Europe. Annals of Geomatics, 9(5), 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, N., Previtali, M., Barazzetti, L., Brumana, R., & Roncella, R. (2016). A virtual hub brokering approach for integration of historical and modern maps. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLI(B4), 163–170. doi: 10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B4-163-2016
   Google Scholar
• Council of Geospatial Organizations. (2015). Report card on the U.S. National spatial data infrastructure (p. 81). Council of Geospatial Organizations. Retrieved from https://www.nsgic.org/public_resources/COGO_Report_Card_020615_Distribution.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Craglia, M., & Annoni, A. (2006). INSPIRE: An innovative approach to the development of spatial data infrastructures in Europe. In GSDI-9 Conference Proceedings (p. 14). Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Craglia, M., & Johnston, A. (2004). Assessing the impacts of spatial data infrastructures: Methods and gaps. In 7th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Heraklion, Greece (Vol. 29).
   Google Scholar
• Crompvoets, J., Wachowicz, M., De Bree, F., & Bregt, A. (2004). Impact assessment of the INSPIRE geo-portal. In 10th EC GI&GIS workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnota, J. (2016). ENERGIC-OD: Business model opportunities in the open data space (p. 14). Presented at the Geospatial World Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2011). Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum, 42(1), 6–15. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurogeographics. (2015, April). Digital Single Market Strategy: The importance of dependable geospatial information. Eurogeographics. Retrieved from http://www.eurogeographics.org/sites/default/files/DSMStrategy%20EG%20briefing%20paper%20V1%202015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016, January 8). INSPIRE history. Retrieved February 3, 2016, from http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/4
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (n.d.). INSPIRE roadmap. Retrieved from http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/44.
   Google Scholar
• European Policy Centre. (n.d.). Establishing the digital single market: Policy recommendations. Retrieved January 14, 2016, from http://www.epc.eu/dsm/6/Policy_recommendations.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Geographic Data Committee. (2015, November). FGDC structure and federal agency and bureau representation. Retrieved March 6, 2016, from https://www.fgdc.gov/participation/
   Google Scholar
• Gabrynowicz, J. I. (2005). The perils of Landsat from grassroots to globalization: A comprehensive review of US remote sensing law with a few thoughts for the future. Chicago Journal of International, 6(1), 45–67.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. (2015). GEOSPATIAL DATA: Progress needed on identifying expenditures, building and utilizing a data infrastructure, and reducing duplicative efforts – 668494_GAO_Address_Ortho_031615.pdf (Report to Congressional Requesters No. GAO-15-193) (p. 98). Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.nsgic.org/public_resources/668494_GAO_Address_Ortho_031615.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. M. (2013). Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. Environment and Planning A, 45(1), 55–69. doi: 10.1068/a45184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, M. G. (2009). Calculable territory and the West German census boycott movements of the 1980s. Political Geography, 28(1), 66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, F. (2003). Developing geographic information infrastructures for local government: the role of trust. Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 47(1), 28–36. doi: 10.1111/1541-0064.02e10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, F., Iwaniak, A., & Coetzee, S. (2012). SDI past, present and future: A review and status assessment. In A. Rajabifard, and D. Coleman (Eds.), Spatially enabling government, industry and citizens (pp. 23–38). Needham, MA: GSDI Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, O. (2015). Geospatial data act of 2015, S. 170 §. Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/114/bills/s740/BILLS-114s740is.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Henttu, H., Izaret, J.-M., & Potere, D. (2012). Geospatial services: A $1.6 trillion growth engine for the U.S. economy. San Francisco, CA: The Boston Consulting Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson-Smith, A., Crooks, A., Gibin, M., Milton, R., & Batty, M. (2009). Neogeography and web 2.0: Concepts, tools and applications. Journal of Location Based Services, 3, 118–145. doi: 10.1080/17489720902950366
   Google Scholar
• Huijboom, N., & Van den Broek, T. (2011). Open data: An international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice, 12, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, K., & Dumortier, J. (2006). The protection of maps and spatial databases in Europe and the United States by copyright and the sui generis right, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 195 (2006). The John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law, 24(2), 2.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. A., & Sieber, R. E. (2013). Situating the adoption of VGI by government. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. F. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge (pp. 65–81). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Karjala, D. S. (1995). Copyright in electronic maps. Jurimetrics, 35(4), 395–415.
   Google Scholar
• Kulk, S., & Van Loenen, B. (2012). Brave new open data world? International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, doi: 10.2902/1725-0463.2012.07.art10
   Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. (2012). Situating the geoweb in political economy. Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 72–89. doi: 10.1177/0309132511411231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski, A. (2013). On the neo in neogeography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104, 60–79. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2013.846159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masser, I. (2003). Governments and geographic information (2nd ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Masser, I. (2007). Building European spatial data infrastructures (Vol. 380). Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, S. M., Hugenholtz, P. B., & Onsrud, H. J. (2001). Europe’s database experiment. Science, 294(5543), 789–790. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/3085055?ref=search-gateway:2ee4a7ae35372156ef85a3ef2366b723. doi: 10.1126/science.1062695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. (2016, February 23). Facebook is making a map of everyone in the world. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/02/facebook-makes-a-new-map-of-everyone-in-the-world/470487/
   Google Scholar
• Monti, M. (2010, May 10). A new strategy for the single market. Report to the President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso. Retrieved from http://www.frank-cs.org/cms/pdfs/EC/EC_Monti_Report_9.5.10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nedović-Budić, Z., Knaap, G., Budhathoki, R., & Cavrić, B. (2009). NSDI building blocks: Regional GIS in the United States. Urisa Journal, 21(2), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Onsrud, H. J. (2004). Geographic information legal issues. Oxford: UNESCO, EOLSS.
   Google Scholar
• Oxera. (2013). What is the economic impact of geo services? (pp. 1–42). Oxford: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rak, A., Coleman, D., & Nichols, S. (2012). Legal liability concerns surrounding volunteered geographic information applicable to Canada. In A. Rajabifard, and D. Coleman (Eds.), Spatially enabling government, industry and citizens (pp. 125–142). Needham, MA: GSDI Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, J. (2012). The right to be forgotten. Stanford Law Review Online, 64, 88.
   Google Scholar
• Rosler, D. B. (1995). European Union’s proposed directive for the legal protection of databases: A new threat to the free flow of information. High Technology Law Journal, 10, 105–145.
   Google Scholar
• Salvemini, M. (2009). The infrastructure for spatial information in the European Community vs. Regional SDI: The shortest way for reaching economic and social development (p. 10). Presented at the Ninth United Nations Regional Cartographic Conference for the Americas, New York, NY. Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/geoinfo/RCC/docs/rcca9/ip/9th_UNRCCA_econf.99_IP12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sui, D., & Goodchild, M. (2011). The convergence of GIS and social media: Challenges for GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25(11), 1737–1748. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2011.604636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tréguer, F. (2012). Interoperability case study: The European Union as an institutional design for legal interoperability (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2148543). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2148543.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• US Copyright Office. (n.d.). Copyright law: Chapter 1, § 105. Subject matter of copyright. Washington, DC: United States Government Works.
   Google Scholar