The map as knowledge base

References

• Arenas, M., Bertails, A., Prud’hommeaux, E., & Sequeda, J. (2012). A direct mapping of relational data to RDF. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb-direct-mapping/
   Google Scholar
• Azócar Fernández, P. I., & Buchroithner, M. F. (2014). Paradigms in cartography, an epistemological review of the 20th and 21st centuries. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Battersby, S. E., Finn, M. P., Usery, E. L., & Yamamoto, K. H. (2014). Implications of Web mercator and its use in online mapping. Cartographica, 49, 85–101. doi: 10.3138/carto.49.2.2313
   Google Scholar
• Bizer, C., & Cyganiak, R. (2017). D2RQ, accessing relational databases as virtual RDF graphs. Retrieved from http://d2rq.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bostock, M. (2015). D3, data-driven documents. Retrieved from https://d3js.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bostock, M., Ogievetsky, V., & Heer, J. (2011). D3: Data-driven documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17, 2301–2309. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2011.185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brachman, R. J., & Levesque, H. J. (2004). Knowledge representation and reasoning. San Francisco, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, C. A. (2016). Designing better maps: A guide for GIS users (2nd ed.). Redlands, CA: Esri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brickley, D. (2003). W3C semantic web interest group [Document]. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/#overview
   Google Scholar
• Carral, D., Scheider, S., Janowicz, K., Vardeman, C., Krisnadhi, A. A., & Hitzler, P. (2013). An ontology design pattern for cartographic Map scaling. In P. Cimiano, O. Corcho, V. Presutti, L. Hollink, & S. Rudolph (Eds.), The semantic web: Semantics and big data: ESWC 2013 (pp. 76–93). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, W., Peterson, M. P., & Gartner, G. (2007). Multimedia cartography. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cheatham, M., Varanka, D., & Arauz, F. (2017). Alignment of surface water ontologies, a comparison of manual and automated approaches. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J., & Usery, E. L. (2004). System integration of GIS and a rule-based expert system for urban mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70, 217–224. doi: 10.14358/PERS.70.2.217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyganiak, R., Wood, D., & Lanthaler, M. (2014). RDF 1.1 concepts and abstract syntax [W3C recommendation]. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/
   Google Scholar
• Dahlström, E., Dengler, P., Grasso, A., Lilley, C., McCormack, C., Schepers, D., … Jackson, D. (Eds.). (2011). Scalable vector graphics (SVG) 1.1. (2nd ed.). [W3C recommendation]. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/
   Google Scholar
• DCMI. (2017). Metadata innovation. Author. Retrieved from http://dublincore.org/
   Google Scholar
• De Dauw, J. (2016). Extension: semantic maps. Retrieved from https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Semantic_Maps
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, J. R. (1985). Cognitive models and cartographic design research. Cartographic Journal, 22, 95–101. doi: 10.1179/caj.1985.22.2.95
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, M., & Joerg, W. (1908). On the nature of maps and map logic. Bulletin of the American Geographical Society, 40, 344–351. doi: 10.2307/198027
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, P. F., & Mackaness, W. A. (1987). Are cartographic expert systems possible? In N. Chrisman (Ed.), Proceedings, eight international symposium on computer-assisted cartography auto-carto 8 (pp. 530–534). Falls Church, VA: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing and American Congress on Surveying and Mapping.
   Google Scholar
• Gandon, F., & Schriber, G. (2014). RDF 1.1 XML syntax [W3C recommendation]. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/
   Google Scholar
• Gessler, D. D. G., Joslyn, C., & Verspoor, K. (2013). A posteriori ontology engineering for data-driven science. In T. Critchlow & K. Kleese van Dam (Eds.), Data-intensive science (pp. 216–244). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmartin, P. (1982). The instructional efficacy of maps in geographic text. Journal of Geography, 41, 145–150. doi: 10.1080/00221348208980869
   Google Scholar
• Goczyła, K., Grabowska, T., Waloszek, W., & Zawadzki, M. (2005). The knowledge cartography – a new approach to reasoning over description logics ontologies. In J. Wiedermann, G. Tel, J. Pokorný, M. Bieliková, & J. Štuller (Eds.), SOFSEM 2006: Theory and practice of computer science (pp. 293–302). Merin, Czech Republic: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, N., & Mackaness, W. (2016). From taxonomies to ontologies: Formalizing generalization knowledge for on-demand mapping. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 43, 208–222. doi: 10.1080/15230406.2015.1072737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, T. (2009). Ontology. In L. Liu & M. Tamer Özsu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of database systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-definition-2007.htm
   Google Scholar
• Grup de Recerca en Interacció Persona Ordinador I Integració de Dades. (2016). RDF to SVG form. Retrieved from http://rhizomik.net/html/redefer/rdf2svg-form/
   Google Scholar
• Hahmann, T., & Usery, E. L. (2015). What is in a contour Map? A region-based logical formalization of contour semantics. In S. I. Fabrikant, M. Raubal, M. Bertolotto, C. Davies, S. Freundschuh, & S. Bell (Eds.), Spatial information theory, Lecture notes in computer science series 9368 (pp. 375–399). Santa Fe, New Mexico: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S., & Seaborne, A. (Eds.). (2013). SPARQL 1.1 query language [W3C recommendation]. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-query-20130321/
   Google Scholar
• Harwell, R. (2004). Web mapping with SVG. Directions Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.directionsmag.com/entry/web-mapping-with-svg/123604
   Google Scholar
• Head, C. G. (1984). The map as natural language: A paradigm for understanding new insights in cartographic communication. Cartographica, The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 21, 1–32. doi: 10.3138/E816-M074-8791-4506
   Google Scholar
• Hebeler, J., Fisher, M., Blace, R., & Perez-Lopez, A. (2009). Semantic Web programming. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., & Rudolph, S. (2010). Foundations of semantic Web technologies. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Imhof, E. (1977). Tasks and methods of theoretical cartography. Cartographica, The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 14, 26–37. doi: 10.3138/XG51-L6G4-U472-5636
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2007). Information technology – common logic (CL): A framework for a family of logic-based languages [ISO/IEC 24707]. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/66249.html
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. (1989). Design considerations for MaPKBS-map projection knowledge-based system. The American Cartographer, 16, 85–95. doi: 10.1559/152304089783875514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janowicz, K., Hu, Y., McKenzie, G., Gao, S., Regalia, B., Mai, G., … Taylor, K. (2016). Moon landing or safari? A study of systematic errors and their causes in geographic linked data. In J. Miller, D. O’Sullivan, & N. Wiegand (Eds.), Geographic information science, 9th international conference GIScience 2016 (pp. 275–290). Berlin: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Jena. (2017). Spatial searches with SPARQL. Retrieved from https://jena.apache.org/documentation/query/spatial-query.html
   Google Scholar
• Kavouras, M., & Kokla, M. (2008). Theories of geographic concepts, ontological approaches to semantic integration. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerling, A. J., Buckley, A. R., Muehrcke, P. C., & Muehrcke, J. O. (2016). Map Use (6th ed.). Redlands, CA: Esri Press Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kraak, M.-J., & Ormeling, F. (2010). Cartography, visualization of spatial data (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krygier, J., & Wood, D. (2011). Making maps: A visual guide to Map design for geographic information systems (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. (Ed.). (2007). Dereferencing HTTP URIs [W3C draft tag finding]. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/httpRange-14/2007-08-31/HttpRange-14.html
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., Goodchild, M. F., & Raskin, R. (2012). Towards geospatial semantic search: Exploiting latent semantic relations in geospatial data. International Journal of Digital Earth, 7, 17–37. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2012.674561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucene, A. (2017). Lucene and Solr. Retrieved from http://lucene.apache.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ludäscher, B., Lin, K., Brodaric, B., & Baru, C. (2003). GEON: Toward a cyberinfrastructure for the geosciences – a prototype for geologic map integration via domain ontologies. Digital Mapping Techniques ’03 – Workshop Proceedings (U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 03-471). Retrieved from http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/of03-471/pdf/ludascher.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. (1995). How maps work; representation, visualization, and design. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackaness, W. A., Fisher, P. F., & Wilkinson, G. G. (1986). Towards a cartographic expert system. In M. Blakemore (Ed.), Auto Carto London: International conference on the acquisition, management and presentation of spatial data, Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1 (pp. 578–587). London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
   Google Scholar
• Meine, K.-H. (1977). Cartographic communication links and a cartographic alphabet. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 14, 72–91. doi: 10.3138/8217-V732-21X0-5347
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S. (2013). Interactive data visualization for the web. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reily Media.
   Google Scholar
• Neytchev, P. (2008). The cartographic knowledge base in formulating the linguistic trend of map semiotics. Geografija, 44(2), 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, A. (2011). Ontology, a practical guide. Angwin, CA: Articulate Software Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, M., & Herring, J. (2012). OGC GeoSPARQL – a geographic query language for RDF data (Open Geospatial Consortium, document reference number OGC 11-052r4). Retrieved from http://www.opengis.net/doc/IS/geosparql/1.0
   Google Scholar
• Petchenik, B. B. (1975). Cognition in cartography. In J. C. Kavaliunas (Ed.), Proceedings of the international symposium on computer-assisted cartography: AutoCarto II (pp. 183–193). Falls Church, VA: American Congress on Surveying and Mapping.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (2014). Mapping in the cloud. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. (2002). Foundations of research in internet cartography. In M. Peterson (Ed.), Maps and the internet (pp. 437–445). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, L. J., & Varanka, D. E. (2017). A linked GeoData map for enabling information access (U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 2017–1150), 6 p. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171150
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, A. D., & Gilmartin, P. (1996). Maps, text, and seventh-graders: A study of spatial learning. Cartographic Perspectives, 24, 3–12. doi: 10.14714/CP24.752
   Google Scholar
• Ratajski, L. (1973). The research structure of theoretical cartography. International Yearbook for Cartography, 13, 217–227.
   Google Scholar
• Salameh, K., Tekli, J., & Chbeir, R. (2014). SVG-to-RDF semantization. In A. J. M. Traina, C. Traina, Jr. & R. L. F. Cordeiro (Eds.), Similarity search and applications, Lecture notes in computer science 8821 (pp. 214–228). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, J. M., & Harth, A. (2011). NeoGeo vocabulary: Defining a shared RDF representation for GeoData. Retrieved from http://geovocab.org/doc/neogeo.html
   Google Scholar
• Salayandia, L. (2010). Contour map WDO [Resource]. Retrieved from http://cybershare-portal.utep.edu/node/214
   Google Scholar
• Schlichtmann, H. (1984). Discussion of C. Grant head ‘The Map as natural language’: A paradigm for understanding. Cartographica: the International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 21, 33–36. doi: 10.3138/N478-8757-1P31-33L5
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, T. A., McMaster, R. B., Kessler, F. C., & Howard, H. H. (2008). Thematic cartography and geographic visualization (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. A. (2010, November). Designing a cartographic ontology for use with expert systems. Paper presented at the ASPRS/CaGIS 2010 Fall Specialty Conference, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Sorny, M., Longley, D., Kellogg, G., Lanthaler, M., & Lindstöm, N. (2014). JSON-LD 1.0, A JSON-based serialization for linked data. [W3C recommendation]. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/
   Google Scholar
• Takagi, S. (Ed). (2015). Svg:transform for mapping [W3C editor’s draft]. Retrieved from https://svgwg.org/specs/transform/
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. R. F. (2003). The concept of cybercartography. In M. P. Peterson (Ed.), Maps and the internet (pp. 405–420). Oxford: Elsevier Science B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. R. F., & Lauriault, T. (Eds.). (2014). Developments in the theory and practice of cybercartography: Applications and indigenous mapping. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Tsou, M.-H. (2003). An intelligent software agent architecture for distributed cartographic knowledge bases and internet mapping services. In M. Peterson (Ed.), Maps and the internet (pp. 229–243). Oxford: Elsevier Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Board on Geographic Names. (2017). The geographic names information system (GNIS). Retrieved from https://geonames.usgs.gov/domestic/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Usery, E. L. (2017). Spatial feature classes. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. L. Kobayashi, W. Liu, & R. Marston (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment, and technology (Vol. 12, pp. 6659–6666). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Usery, E. L., Altheide, P., Deister, R. R. P., & Barr, D. J. (1988). Knowledge-based GIS techniques applied to geological engineering. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54, 1623–1628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS. (2017). The national map. Retrieved from https://nationalmap.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Varanka, D. (1991). An approach to map/text interrelationships. In D. M. Mark & P. F. Dordrecht (Eds.), Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographical space (pp. 285–294). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez-Gross, H. A., Yu, J. J., Figueroa, B., Gessler, D. D. G., Neale, D. B., & Wegrzyn, J. L. (2013). Cartogratree: Connecting tree genomes, phenotypes, and environment. Molecular Ecology Resources, 13, 528–537. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayasankaran, N. (2015). Enhanced place name search using semantic gazetteers (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Maine, Orono, ME.
   Google Scholar
• VoCamp. (2017). Retrieved from http://vocamp.org/wiki/Main_Page
   Google Scholar
• W3C OWL Working Group. (2012). OWL 2 web ontology language, document overview (2nd ed.) [W3C recommendation]. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview
   Google Scholar
• Weigand, N., Grove, R., Wilson, J., & Kolas, D. (2014). Querying geospatial data over the Web: A GeoSPARQL interface. In Georich'14 proceedings of workshop on managing and mining enriched geo-spatial data. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., & Fels, J. (1986). Designs on signs: Myth and meaning in maps. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 23, 54–103. doi: 10.3138/R831-50R3-7247-2124
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. K. (1944). Map makers are human. Geographical Review, 32, 527–544. doi: 10.2307/209994
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Zhao, T., & Li, W. (2015). Geospatial semantic Web. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar