2000 Years of ‘globes vs. maps’ – lessons (to be) learned

References

• Battersby, S. E., & Kessler, F. (2012). Cues for interpreting distortion in map projections. Journal of Geography, 111(3), 93–101. doi: 10.1080/00221341.2011.609895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battersby, S. E., & Montello, D. R. (2009). Area estimation of world regions and the projection of the global-scale cognitive map. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(2), 273–291. doi: 10.1080/00045600802683734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren, J. L., & Jones, A. (2000). Ptolemy’s geography: An annotated translation of the theoretical chapters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brotton, J. (2014). A history of the world in 12 maps. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Carbon, C. C., & Hesslinger, V. M. (2013). Attitudes and cognitive distances: On the non-unitary and flexible nature of cognitive maps. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 121–129. doi: 10.5709/acp-0140-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, F. G. (1917). European treaties bearing on the history of the United States and its dependencies to 1648. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• De Las Casas, B. (1986/1527–1561). Historia de las Indias. Caracas: Fundación Biblioteca Ayacuch.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, A., & Brown, N. R. (2000). Reasoning about geography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 193–219. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, A., & Montello, D. R. (2006). Global-scale location and distance estimates: Common representations and strategies in absolute and relative judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 333–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, J. B., & Woodward, D. (1987). The history of cartography (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrisse, H. (1897). The diplomatic history of America. Its first chapter. London: Stevens.
   Google Scholar
• Hennerdal, P. (2015). Beyond the periphery: Child and adult understanding of world map continuity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 773–790. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2015.1022091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig, R. (1948). The representation on maps of the magalhães straits before their discovery. Imago Mundi, 5, 33–37. doi: 10.1080/03085694808591902
   Google Scholar
• Hruby, F., Avelino, M. C., & Ayala, R. M. (2016). Journey to the end of the world Map – How edges of world maps shape the spatial mind. GI_Forum 2016, 1, 314–323.
   Google Scholar
• Hruby, F., & Riedl, A. (2013). Maps versus globes–distance estimation on flat and spherical displays. Kartographische Nachrichten, 63(4), 205–209.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. L. (1917). The geography of Strabo ( Loeb Classical Library, Vol. 1). Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Strabo/2E1*.html
   Google Scholar
• Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics. New York, NY: International Non-Aristotelian Library Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kraak, M. J., & Ormeling, F. (2010). Cartography: Visualization of geospatial data. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maling, D. H. (2013). Coordinate systems and map projections. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monmonier, M. (2004). Rhumb lines and map wars: A social history of the Mercator projection. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. (2002). Cognitive map-design research in the twentieth century: Theoretical and empirical approaches. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29(3), 283–304. doi: 10.1559/152304002782008503
   Google Scholar
• Olwig, K. R. (2011). The earth is not a globe: Landscape versus the ‘globalist’ agenda. Landscape Research, 36(4), 401–415. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2011.582940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. (1879). A quincuncial projection of the sphere. American Journal of Mathematics, 2(4), 394–396. doi: 10.2307/2369491
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, A. (2010). Gauss’ Theorema Egregium. In A. Pressley (Ed.), Elementary differential geometry (pp. 247–268). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Riedl, A. (2011). Digital globes: Their historical development. Globe Studies, 57/58, 149–161.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. H. (1985). Arno Peters and his new cartography. The American Cartographer, 12(2), 103–111. doi: 10.1559/152304085783915063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. H., Morrison, J. L., Muehrcke, P. C., Kimerling, A. J., & Guptill, S. C. (1995). Elements of cartography. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Saarinen, T. F. (1987). Centering of mental maps of the world. Tucson: ERIC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. P. (1997). Flattening the earth: Two thousand years of map projections. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sumira, S. (2014). Globes: 400 years of exploration, navigation, and power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Šavrič, B., Jenny, B., White, D., & Strebe, D. R. (2015). User preferences for world map projections. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42(5), 398–409. doi: 10.1080/15230406.2015.1014425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vujakovic, P. (2003). Damn or be damned: Arno Peters and the struggle for the ‘new cartography’. The Cartographic Journal, 40(1), 61–67. doi: 10.1179/000870403235002105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar