114
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reasoning about socio-economic data: a visual analytics approach to Bayesian network

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 225-241 | Received 22 Feb 2019, Accepted 19 Apr 2019, Published online: 13 May 2019

References

  • Abebe, Y., Kabir, G., & Tesfamariam, S. (2018). Assessing urban areas vulnerability to pluvial flooding using GIS applications and Bayesian belief network model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1629–1641.
  • Berrar, D. (2019). Bayes theorem and Naive Bayes classifier. In S. Ranganathan, M. Gribskov, K. Nakai, and C. Schönbach (Eds.) Encyclopedia of bioinformatics and computational biology (pp. 403–412). Oxford: Academic Press.
  • Bloch, I. (2006). Spatial reasoning under imprecision using fuzzy set theory, formal logics and mathematical morphology. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 41(2), 77–95. Advances in Fuzzy Sets and Rough Sets.
  • Brase, G. L. (2009). Pictorial representations in statistical reasoning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 369–381.
  • Chee, Y. E., Wilkinson, L., Nicholson, A. E., Quintana-Ascencio, P. F., Fauth, J. E., Hall, D., & Rumpff, L. (2016). Modeling spatial and temporal changes with GIS and spatial and dynamic Bayesian networks. Environmental Modelling and Software, 82, 108–120.
  • Chiang, C.-h., Shaughnessy, P., Livingston, G., & Grinstein, G. (2005). Visualizing graphical probabilistic models. Technical Report, UML CS.
  • Choi, J., & Usery, E. L. (2004). System integration of GIS and a rule-based expert system for urban mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70(2), 217–224.
  • Chuprikova, E., MacEachren, A. M., Cron, J., & Meng, L. (2018). Visual analytics-enabled Bayesian network approach to reasoning about public camera data. In Kai Lawonn, Noeska Smit, Lars Linsen and Robert Kosara (Eds.) EuroVis workshop on reproducibility, verification, and validation in visualization (EuroRV3). Prague: The Eurographics Association.
  • Cole, W. G. (1989). Understanding Bayesian reasoning via graphical displays. SIGCHI Bulletin, 20(SI), 381–386.
  • Darwiche, A. (2009). Modeling and reasoning with Bayesian networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Drury, B., Valverde-Rebaza, J., Moura, M.-F., & de Andrade Lopes, A. (2017). A survey of the applications of Bayesian networks in agriculture. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 65(Supplement C), 29–42.
  • Foody, G. (1996). Fuzzy modelling of vegetation from remotely sensed imagery. Ecological Modelling, 85(1), 3–12. Fuzzy Logic in Ecological Modelling.
  • Friederichs, H., Ligges, S., & Weissenstein, A. (2014). Using tree diagrams without numerical values in addition to relative numbers improves students' numeracy skills: A randomized study in medical education. Medical Decision Making, 34(2), 253–257.
  • Friendly, M. (1994). Mosaic displays for multi-way contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425), 190–200.
  • Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102(4), 684–704.
  • Goodchild, M. F. (2008). Imprecision and spatial uncertainty. Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 480–483.
  • Griffiths, T., & Tenenbaum, J. (2006). Statistics and the Bayesian mind. Significance, 3(3), 130–133.
  • Højsgaard, S. (2013). Bayesian networks in R with the gRain package. Aalborg University, 46(2012), 1–17.
  • House, L., Leman, S., & Han, C. (2015). Bayesian visual analytics: baVA. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, 8(1), 1–13.
  • Jayababu, Y. (2015). Probabilistic distance clustering: A spatial clustering approach for remote sensing imagery. International Journal of Computer Applications, 126(14), 9–14.
  • Keim, D., Kohlhammer, J., Ellis, G., & Mansmann, F. (2010). Mastering the information age: Solving problems with visual analytics, Eurographics Association.
  • Kenett, R. S. (2016). On generating high infoQ with Bayesian networks. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management, 13(3), 309–332.
  • Kirschenbaum, S. S., Trafton, J. G., Schunn, C. D., & Trickett, S. B. (2014). Visualizing uncertainty. Human Factors, 56(3), 509–520.
  • Korb, K. B., & Nicholson, A. E. (2010). Chapter 1: Bayesian reasoning. In Bayesian artificial intelligence (pp. 3–28). London, UK: Chapman & Hall (CRC series in computer science and data analysis).
  • Li, L., Wang, J., Leung, H., & Jiang, C. (2010). Assessment of catastrophic risk using Bayesian network constructed from domain knowledge and spatial data. Risk Analysis, 30(7), 1157–1175.
  • Lin, X., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Gao, L., Zhao, L., & Deng, M. (2017). A probabilistic embedding clustering method for urban structure detection. ISPRS – International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W7, 1263–1268.
  • Malpica, J., Alonso, M., & Sanz, M. (2007). Dempster – Shafer theory in geographic information systems: A survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(1), 47–55.
  • Martignon, L., & Wassner, C. (2002). Teaching decision making and statistical thinking with natural frequencies. In B. Phillips (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International conference on teaching statistics (pp. 1–4). Cape Town, South Africa: International Statistical Institute.
  • Osseiran, A. (2001). Qualitative payesian networks. Information Sciences, 131(1), 87–106.
  • Ottley, A., Peck, E. M., Harrison, L. T., Afergan, D., Ziemkiewicz, C., Taylor, H. A., & Chang, R. (2016). Improving Bayesian reasoning: The effects of phrasing, visualization, and spatial ability. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1), 529–538.
  • Pearl, J. (1985). Bayesian networks: A model of self-activated memory for evidential reasoning. In Proceedings of cognitive science society (CSS-7).
  • Peng, L., Niu, R., Huang, B., Wu, X., Zhao, Y., & Ye, R. (2014). Landslide susceptibility mapping based on rough set theory and support vector machines: A case of the three gorges area, China. Geomorphology, 204, 287–301.
  • Pietro, L. D., Mugion, R. G., Musella, F., Renzi, M. F., & Vicard, P. (2017). Monitoring an airport check-in process by using Bayesian networks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 106(Suppl. C), 235–247.
  • Prestwich, S. D., Toffano, F., & Wilson, N. (2017). A probabilistic programming language for influence diagrams. In S. Moral, O. Pivert, D. Sánchez, & N. Marín (Eds.), international conference on scalable uncertainty management, (pp. 252–265). Springer International Publishing.
  • Rodgers, P. (2014). A survey of Euler diagrams. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 25, 134–155.
  • Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson Education Limited: Malaysia.
  • Scutari, M. (2009). Learning Bayesian networks with the bnlearn R package. VV(II).
  • Spiegelhalter, D., Pearson, M., & Short, I. (2011). Visualizing uncertainty about the future. Science (New York, NY), 333(6048), 1393–1400.
  • Squicciarini, A. C., Dupont, J., & Chen, R. (2014). Online abusive users analytics through visualization. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on world wide web, WWW '14 Companion (pp. 155–158), New York, NY: ACM.
  • Stassopoulou, a., Petrou, M., & Kittler, J. (1998). Application of a Bayesian network in a GIS-based decision making system. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12(1), 23–46.
  • Strasser, C., & Antonelli, G. A. (2018). Non-monotonic logic. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (pp. 1–5). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Summer 2018 edition.
  • Sucharita, G. (2016). Artificial neural networks in geospatial analysis (pp. 1–7). New York City, USA: American Cancer Society.
  • Taalab, K., Corstanje, R., Zawadzka, J., Mayr, T., Whelan, M., Hannam, J., & Creamer, R. (2015). On the application of Bayesian networks in digital soil mapping. Geoderma, 259–260(October), 134–148.
  • Tannert, C., Elvers, H.-D., & Jandrig, B. (2007). The ethics of uncertainty. EMBO Reports, 8(10), 892–896.
  • Thomas, J. J., & Cook, K. A. (2005). Illuminating the path: The research and development agenda for visual analytics. National Visualization and Analytics Ctr.
  • Villa, V., & Cozzani, V. (2016). Application of Bayesian networks to quantitative assessment of safety barriers performance in the prevention of major accidents. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 53, 151–156.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.