Designing multi-scale maps: lessons learned from existing practices

References

• Appert, C., & Fekete, J. D. (2006). OrthoZoom scroller: 1D multi-scale navigation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 21–30). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bederson, B. B., & Hollan, J. D. (1994). Pad++: A zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics Pad++: A zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. In Proceedings of the 7th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (pp. 17–26). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo, M. J., & Farid, H. (2008). A scale invariant measure of clutter. Journal of Vision, 8(1), 23. doi: 10.1167/8.1.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, C. A., & Buttenfield, B. P. (2007, January). Framing guidelines for multi-scale map design using databases at multiple resolutions. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1559/152304007780279078
   Google Scholar
• Brychtová, A., Çöltekin, A., & Paszto, V. (2016, July). Do the visual complexity algorithms match the generalization process in geographical displays? In ISPRS – International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, commission II, TeS: WG II/6 geovisualization and virtual reality. Prague, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Burghardt, D., & Cecconi, A. (2007, March 1). Mesh simplification for building typification. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(3), 283–298. doi: 10.1080/13658810600912323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çöltekin, A., Brychtová, A., Griffin, A. L., Robinson, A. C., Imhof, M., & Pettit, C. (2016, October 14). Perceptual complexity of soil-Landscape maps: A user evaluation of color organization in legend designs using eye tracking. International Journal of Digital Earth, 10(6), 560–581. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2016.1234007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P., Forrest, D., & Pearson, A. (2003, June 1). The representation of topographic information on maps: The depiction of relief. The Cartographic Journal, 40(1), 17–26. doi: 10.1179/000870403235002033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P., Pearson, A., & Forrest, D. (1998, December 1). The representation of topographic information on maps – Vegetation and rural land use. The Cartographic Journal, 35(2), 191–197. doi: 10.1179/caj.1998.35.2.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H., Golledge, R. G., Gale, N., & Tobler, W. (1987, June). Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 7(2), 99–122. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(87)80020-8
   Google Scholar
• Duchêne, C., Baella, B., Brewer, C. A., Burghardt, D., Buttenfield, B. P., Gaffuri, J., … Wiedemann, A. (2014). Generalisation in practice within national mapping agencies. In D. Burghardt, C. Duchêne, & W. Mackaness (Eds.), Abstracting geographic information in a data rich world (pp. 329–391). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Elmqvist, N., Moere, A. V., Jetter, H. C., Cernea, D., Reiterer, H., & Jankun-Kelly, T. J. (2011). Fluid interaction for information visualization. Information Visualization, 10(4), 327–340. doi: 10.1177/1473871611413180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, D. (2006, December 1). Measuring map complexity. The Cartographic Journal, 43(3), 224–238. doi: 10.1179/000870406X169883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, D., Pearson, A., & Collier, P. (1997, December 1). The representation of topographic information on maps – The coastal environment. The Cartographic Journal, 34(2), 77–85. doi: 10.1179/caj.1997.34.2.77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünreich, D. (1985). Ein Vorschlag zum Aufbau einer grossmassstäbigen topographisch-kartographischen Datenbank unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Grundrissdatei des ALK-Systems. Nachrichten aus dem Karten- und Vermessungswesen, Series I 95 55+.
   Google Scholar
• Guiard, Y., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., & Mottet, D. (1999). Navigation as multiscale pointing: Extending fitts' model to very high precision tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 450–457). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Harrie, L., Stigmar, H., & Djordjevic, M. (2015, March 27). Analytical estimation of map readability. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(2), 418–446. doi: 10.3390/ijgi4020418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinzle, F., & Anders, K. H. (2007). Characterising space via pattern recognition techniques: Identifying patterns in road networks. In W. A. Mackaness, A. Ruas, & T. Sarjakoski (Eds.), The generalisation of geographic information: Models and applications (Chapter 12). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hoarau, C. (2012). Orthoimage or map visualization in use in geoportals – Case study on the French geoportal. In Proceedings of AutoCarto 2012. Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfstock, A. (2007, August). A comparative study of european topographic maps at scale 1:250,000 (with particular emphasis on motorways). In Proceedings of 23rd international cartographic conference, Moscow, Russia.
   Google Scholar
• Javed, W., Ghani, S., & Elmqvist, N. (2012). Polyzoom: Multiscale and multifocus exploration in 2D visual spaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 287–296). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jégou, L., & Deblonde, J. P. (2012, April 11). Vers une visualisation de la complexité de l'image cartographique. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography (article 600).
   Google Scholar
• Jul, S., & Furnas, G. W. (1998). Critical zones in desert fog: Aids to multiscale navigation. In Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (pp. 97–106). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, A. J., & Vujakovic, P. (2009, August 1). Stylistic diversity in European state 1:50 000 topographic maps. The Cartographic Journal, 46(3), 179–213. doi: 10.1179/000870409X12488753453453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobo, M.-J., Pietriga, E., & Appert, C. (2015). An evaluation of interactive map comparison techniques. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3573–3582). Seoul, South Korea: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mackaness, W. A. (2007). Understanding geographic space. In W. A. Mackaness, A. Ruas, & T. Sarjakoski (Eds.), The generalisation of geographic information: Models and applications (pp. 1–10). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Midtbø, T., & Nordvik, T. (2007, December 1). Effects of animations in zooming and panning operations on web maps: A web-based experiment. The Cartographic Journal, 44(4), 292–303. doi: 10.1179/000870407X241845
   Google Scholar
• Moacdieh, N., & Sarter, N. (2014, July 3). Display clutter: A review of definitions and measurement techniques. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 57(1), 61–100. doi: 10.1177/0018720814541145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regnauld, N. (2001, December 21). Contextual building typification in automated map generalization. Algorithmica, 30(2), 312–333. doi: 10.1007/s00453-001-0008-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regnauld, N., & Revell, P. (2007, August). Automatic amalgamation of buildings for producing ordnance survey 1:50 000 scale maps. The Cartographic Journal, 44(3), 239–250. doi: 10.1179/000870407X241782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revell, P., Regnauld, N., & Thom, S. (2007, August). Generalising and symbolising ordnance survey base scale data to create a prototype 1:50 000 scale vector map. The Cartographic Journal, 44(3), 251–257. doi: 10.1179/000870407X241791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y., & Nakano, L. (2007, August 16). Measuring visual clutter. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 17. doi: 10.1167/7.2.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. (2013). An empirically-Derived taxonomy of interaction primitives for interactive cartography and geovisualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12), 2356–2365. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2013.130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusnák, V., Appert, C., Chapuis, O., & Pietriga, E. (2018). Designing coherent gesture sets for multi-scale navigation on tabletops. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Schnur, S., Bektaş, K., & Çöltekin, A. (2017). Measured and perceived visual complexity: A comparative study among three online map providers. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45(3), 238–254. doi: 10.1080/15230406.2017.1323676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislawski, L. V., Buttenfield, B. P., Bereuter, P., Savino, S., & Brewer, C. A. (2014). Generalisation operators. In D. Burghardt, C. Duchêne, & W. Mackaness (Eds.), Abstracting geographic information in a data rich world (pp. 157–195). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stoter, J., van Smaalen, J., Bakker, N., & Hardy, P. (2009, August 1). Specifying map requirements for automated generalization of topographic data. The Cartographic Journal, 46(3), 214–227. doi: 10.1179/174327709X446637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touya, G., Decherf, B., Lalanne, M., & Dumont, M. (2015, September). Comparing image-based methods for assessing visual clutter in generalized maps. ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences II-3/W5.
   Google Scholar
• Touya, G., & Girres, J. F. (2013, June 1). ScaleMaster 2.0: A scaleMaster extension to monitor automatic multi-scales generalizations. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40(3), 192–200. doi: 10.1080/15230406.2013.809233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touya, G., Hoarau, C., & Christophe, S. (2016). Clutter and map legibility in automated cartography: A research agenda. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 51(4), 198–207. doi: 10.3138/cart.51.4.3132
   Google Scholar
• Touya, G., & Reimer, A. (2015). Inferring the scale of openstreetmap features. In J. Jokar Arsanjani, A. Zipf, P. Mooney, & M. Helbich (Eds.), OpenStreetMap in GIScience (pp. 81–99). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., Morrison, J.B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002, October). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(4), 247–262. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oosterom, P., Meijers, M., Stoter, J., & Šuba, R. (2014). Data structures for continuous generalisation: tGAP and SSC. In D. Burghardt, C. Duchêne, & W. Mackaness (Eds.), Abstracting geographic information in a data rich world (pp. 83–117). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, C. (2012). Information visualization, third edition: Perception for design (Interactive technologies). Hardcover: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, S. (2014, September 23). Towards a multi-representation database approach to on-demand mapping and continuous zooming. In Proceedings of 17th ICA workshop on generalisation and multiple representation, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar