Moving beyond case studies: applying social network analysis to study learning-as-participation

References

• Atteberry, A., & Bryk, A. S. (2010). Centrality, connection, and commitment: The role of social networks in school-based literacy initiatives. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 51–76). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ávila de Lima, J. (2010). Studies of networks in education: Methods for collecting and managing high quality data. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 243–258). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Back, M. (2011). Legitimate peripheral participation and language learning: Two Quichua learners in a transnational community. Language Learning, 61(4), 1039–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker-Doyle, K. J., & Yoon, S. A. (2010). Making expertise transparent: Using technology to strengthen social networks in teacher professional development. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 115–126). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25–55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., MaKinster, J. G., & Scheckler, R. (2003). Designing system dualities: Characterizing a web-supported professional development community. The Information Society, 19(3), 237–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Sciences, 323, 892–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., & Ofem, B. (2010). Overview: Social network theory and analysis. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 17–30). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1983). Ökonomisches Kapital – Kulturelles Kapital – Soziales Kapital (Economic capital – cultural capital – social capital). In R. Kreckel (Ed.), Soziale Ungleichheit (Social inequality) (Vol. 2) (pp. 183–198). Göttingen: Schwartz.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R. P., & Weinbaum, E. H. (2010). Changes in attitude: Peer influence in high school reform. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 77–96). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. (2005). Communities of practice: Legitimacy not choice. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(4), 557–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2014). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice—participation support structures for newcomers in faculty student councils. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 216–244. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.883978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., Lund, K., Barrat, A., Sailer, M., & Fischer, F. (2013). The development of collaborations in a scientific community – evidence from an experiment using sociometric RFID devices. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time, and scale: CSCL 2013 conference proceedings volume 1 – Full papers & symposia (pp. 169–175). Madison, WI: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Finnigan, K. S., & Daly, A. J. (2010). Learning at a system level: Ties between principals of low-performing schools and central office leaders. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 179–196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, K. A., Kim, C. M., & Belman, D. (2010). Utility theory, social networks, and teacher decision making: Modelling networks’ influences on teacher attitudes and practices. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 223–242). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, A., Hodkinson, H., Hodkinson, P., & Unwin, L. (2005). Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: A reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning. British Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological theory, 1(1), 201–233.
   Google Scholar
• Hatala, J.-P. (2006). Social network analysis in human resource development: A new methodology. Human Resource Development Review, 5, 45–71.
   Google Scholar
• Hoadley, C. M. (2005). The shape of the elephant: Scope and membership of the CSCL community. In T. Koschman, D. D. Suthers, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning: the next 10 years! Proceedings of the international conference on computer supported collaborative learning 2005 (pp. 205–210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lambson, D. (2010). Novice teachers learning through participation in a teacher study group. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1660–1668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, N. M., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2010). Social networks, trust, and innovation: The role of relationships in supporting an innovative climate in Dutch schools. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 97–114). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nurmela, K. A., Lehtinen, E., & Palonen, T. (1999). Evaluating CSCL log files by social network analysis. In C. M. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL) 1999 conference (pp. 434–444). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Frank, K. A., & Krause, A. (2010). Between leaders and teachers: Using social network analysis to examine the effect of distributed leadership. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 159–178). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reffai, C., & Chanier, T. (2000). How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance-learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 76–98). Chicago: OpenCourt.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2012). Social network analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the danger of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W., Hatfield, D., Svarovsky, G., Nash, P., Nulty, A., Bagley, E., Frank, K., Rupp, A., & Mislevy, R. (2009). Epistemic network analysis: A prototype for 21st century assessment of learning. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for networks dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Healey, K., & Kim, C. M. (2010). Leading and managing instruction: Formal and informal aspects of the elementary school organization. In A. J. Daly (Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 129–158). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmann, K. (2014). Constructing nomological nets on the basis of process analyses to strengthen CSCL research. Frontline Learning Research, 2(4), 25–33. doi:10.14786/flr.v2i4.112
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. (2011). Using social network graphs as visualization tools to influence peer selection decision-making strategies to access information about complex socioscientific issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(4), 549–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar