Geographic Representation in GIS and Art: Common Threads as Exemplified in Paintings by Seurat, Signac, Mondrian, and Diebenkorn

REFERENCES

• Alpers, S. 1983. The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxandall, M. 1985. Patterns of intention: On the historical explanation of pictures. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blotkamp, C. 2001. Mondrian, the art of destruction. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bolstad, P. 2016. GIS fundamentals: A first text on geographic information systems. 5th ed. White Bear Lake, MN: Eider.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., and L. Knopp. 2008. Queering the map: The productive tensions of colliding epistemologies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98:40–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrough, P. A. 1992. Are GIS data structures too simple minded? Computers & Geosciences 18:395–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cable, D. 2013. The racial dot map. Charlottesville, VA: Demographics Research Group, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, University of Virginia. Accessed December 23, 2017. https://demographics.virginia.edu/DotMap/.
   Google Scholar
• Cacquard, S., L. Vaughan, and W. Cartwright, eds. 2011. Mapping environmental issues in the city: Arts and cartography cross perspectives. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, W., G. Gartner, and A. Lehn, eds. 2009. Cartography and art. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. J. 1984. The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Manet and his followers. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. J. 1999. Farewell to an idea: Episodes from a history of modernism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D., and G. Tinterow. 1983. The essential cubism, 1907–1920: Braque, Picasso & their friends. London: Tate Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, D. 2005. Maps, mapping, modernity: Art and cartography in the twentieth century. Imago Mundi 57:35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H. 1992. People manipulate objects (but cultivate rields): Beyond the raster-vector debate in GIS. In International conference GIS—From space to territory: Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning, ed. A. U. Frank, I. Campari, and U. Formentini, 65–77. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cova, T. J., and M. F. Goodchild. 2002. Extending geographical representation to include fields of spatial objects. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 16:509–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. 2010. Mapping: A critical introduction to cartography and GIS. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W., S. M. Roberts, and A. Poorthuis. 2014. The new political economy of geographical intelligence. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 104:196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, C. 2013. Sovereigns, spooks, and hackers: An early history of Google geo services and map mashups. Cartographica 48 (4):261–74.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, J. 2011. Humanities approaches to graphical display. Digital Humanities Quarterly 5 (1). Accessed December 24, 2017. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html#
   Google Scholar
• Faivre, A. 1994. Access to Western esotericism. Buffalo, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. U., G. S. Volta, and M. McGranahan. 1997. Formalization of families of categorical coverages. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 11:215–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage, J. 1987. The technique of Seurat: A reappraisal. The Art Bulletin 69:448–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. 1972. Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F., M. Yuan, and T. J. Cova. 2007. Towards a general theory of geographic representation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21:239–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, J. B. 1989. Deconstructing the map. Cartographica 26 (2):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Harley, J. B., and K. Zandfliet. 1992. Art, science, and power in sixteenth-century Dutch cartography. Cartographica 29:10–19.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, K., and G. Clemans. 2009. The map as art: Contemporary artists explore cartography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, F., M. P. Kwan, and M. Pavlovskaya. 2005. Introduction: Critical GIS. Cartographica 40 (4):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• High Museum of Art. 2016. Piet Mondrian. Accessed June 11, 2017. https://www.high.org/en/Educators/Teacher-Resources/Picasso-To-Warhol-Teacher-Resources/Meet-the-Masters/Piet-Mondrian.
   Google Scholar
• Hinson, T. E. 1980. Recent paintings by Richard Diebenkorn and Jack Tworkov. Bulletin of the Cleveland Museum of Art 67:31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Homburg, C. 2014. Neo-impressionism and the dream of realities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Homer, W. I. 1964. Seurat and the science of painting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, L., M. Meijers, R. Suba, and P. Van Oosterom. 2016. Engineering web maps with gradual content zoom based on streaming vector data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 114:274–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, G. 1953. “Pointillism” as a cartographic technique. The Professional Geographer 5:4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kandinksy, W. [1912] 2006. Concerning the spiritual in art, trans. M. Sadler. Boston: MFA Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kawano, Y., A. Munaim, J. Goto, Y. Shobugawa, and M. Naito. 2016. Sensing space: Augmenting scientific data with spatial ethnography. GeoHumanities 2 (2):485–508.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, A. K., L. Westerveld, and L. Strom. 2016. Inductive visualization: A humanistic alternative to GIS. GeoHumanities 1 (2):233–65.
   Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. M. 1994. Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, M. P. 2007. Affecting geospatial technologies: Toward a feminist politics of emotion. The Professional Geographer 59:33–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachman, G. 2012. Madame Blavatsky: The mother of modern spirituality. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lebensztejn, J. C. 2010. Passage: Note on the ideology of early abstraction. In Paths to abstraction 1867–1917, ed. T. Maloon, 31–51. Sydney, Australia: Art Gallery of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 1987. Seurat and science. Art History 10:203–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, J. 1997. The art of Richard Diebenkorn. New York: Whitney Museum of American Art.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. M. 1995. How maps work. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Maloon, T. 2010. Towards abstraction. In Paths to abstraction 1867–1917, ed. T. Maloon, 15–29. Sydney, Australia: Art Gallery of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. 2001. The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. 2007. Abstraction and complexity. In MediaArtHistories, ed. O. Grau, 339–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D. M., and F. Csillag. 1989. The nature of boundaries on “area-class” maps. Cartographica 26:65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, D. 1982. Vision. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Mehring, C. 2005. Decoration and abstraction in Blinky Palermo’s wall paintings. Grey Room 18:82–107.
   Google Scholar
• Mennis, J. 2009. Dasymetric mapping for estimating population in small areas. Geography Compass 3 (2):727–45.
   Google Scholar
• Mennis, J. 2017. Data structure, raster. In The international encyclopedia of geography, ed. D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, and R. A. Marston. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mennis, J., M. J. Mason, and Y. Cao. 2013. Qualitative GIS and the visualization of narrative activity space data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 27 (2):267–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennis, J., D. J. Peuquet, and L. Qian. 2000. A conceptual framework for incorporating cognitive principles into geographical database representation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14 (6):501–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. 1976. Cognition and reality: Principles and implication of cognitive psychology. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Peuquet, D. J. 1984. A conceptual framework and comparison of spatial data models. Cartographica 21:66–113.
   Google Scholar
• Peuquet, D. J. 2002. Representations of space and time. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Pickles, J. 1995. Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. In New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Presner, T. 2010. Digital humanities 2.0: A report on knowledge. In Emerging disciplines, ed. M. Bailar, 63–86. Houston, TX: Rice University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratliff, F. 1992. Paul Signac and color in Neo-impressionism. New York: Rockefeller University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, R. 1980. Historical links between cartography and art. Geographical Review 70:60–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, D. 2011. The computer graphics manual. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Troy, N. J. 1983. The De Stijl environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B. 2013. Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS, ed. A. U. Frank & I. Campari, 14–24. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. 2011. Beginning modernism. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2003. De Stijl and Dutch modernism. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodword, D., ed. 1987. Art and cartography: Six historical essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C.-K., and H.-L. Yang. 2008. Realization of Seurat’s pointillism via non-photorealistic rendering. The Visual Computer 24:303–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar