143
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The New Anglo-Saxons: Race, Space, and the Production of a Geopolitical Discourse

Pages 1-17 | Received 24 Apr 2023, Accepted 16 Aug 2023, Published online: 13 Oct 2023

REFERENCES

  • Adams, H. B. 1882a. Letter to Daniel Coit Gilman, 3 July. Herbert Baxter Adams Papers. Series 1, Box 18, Folder 2. Johns Hopkins University Libraries.
  • Adams, H. B. 1882b. The Germanic origin of New England towns. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
  • Adams, H. B. 1882c. Tithingmen. Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society 1:398–420.
  • Adams, H. B. 1884. Letter to E.A. Freeman, 1 May. Edward Augustus Freeman Papers. Series 1, Box 7, Folder 1–13. University of Manchester Library Special Collections.
  • Adams, H. B. 1894. Is history past politics?: A paper read in Baltimore, November 30, 1894. at the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Association of Colleges and Preparatory Schools in the Middle States and Maryland. Herbert Baxter Adams Papers. Series 3, Box 32, Folder 21. Johns Hopkins University Libraries.
  • Adams, H. B. 1895. Freeman the scholar and professor. Yale Review, November 1895.
  • Adams, H. B. n.d.a. Undated lecture on “Early Germanic Institutions.” Herbert Baxter Adams Papers. Series 2, Box 21, Folder 12. Johns Hopkins University Libraries.
  • Adams, H. B. n.d.b. Undated lecture on “Ethnology.” Herbert Baxter Adams Papers. Series 2, Box 21, Folder 12. Johns Hopkins University Libraries.
  • Adams, H. B. n.d.c. Undated lecture on “The English people in their three homes.” Herbert Baxter Adams Papers. Series 2, Box 21, Folder 12. Johns Hopkins University Libraries.
  • Adams, I., and L. Adams. 2005. Brothers across the ocean: British foreign policy and the origins of the Anglo-American “special relationship,” 1900–1905. London: Tauris Academic Studies.
  • Agnew, J. A., and S. Corbridge. 1995. Mastering space: Hegemony, territory and international political economy. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • America First Caucus Policy Platform. 2021. Punchbowl News. Accessed May 22, 2021. https://punchbowl.news/wp-content/uploads/America-First-Caucus-Policy-Platform-FINAL-2.pdf.
  • Anderson, S. 1981. Race and rapprochement: Anglo-Saxonism and Anglo-American relations, 1895-1904. Toronto: Associated University Presses, Inc.
  • Bell, D., and S. Vucetic. 2019. Brexit, CANZUK, and the Legacy of Empire. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21 (2):367–82. doi:10.1177/1369148118819070.
  • Bevir, M. 1999. Foucault and critique: Deploying agency against autonomy. Political Theory 27 (1):65–84. doi:10.1177/0090591799027001004.
  • Brundage, A., and R. A. Cosgrove. 2007. The great tradition: Constitutional history and national identity in Britain and the United States, 1870-1960. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bryce, J. 1892. Edward Augustus Freeman. The English Historical Review VII (XXVII):497–509. doi:10.1093/ehr/VII.XXVII.497.
  • Carvalho, A. 2005. Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect: Discursive strategies in the British media. Critical Discourse Studies 2 (1):1–29. doi:10.1080/17405900500052143.
  • Cronne, H. A. 1943. Historical Revision No. CIII: Edward Augustus Freeman, 1823–1892. History New Series 28 (107):78–92.
  • Cunningham, R. J. 1981. The German historical world of Herbert Baxter Adams: 1874–1876. The Journal of American History 68 (2):261–75.
  • Dijkink, G. 1996. National identity & geopolitical visions: Maps of pride and pain. London: Routledge. doi:10.2307/1889972.
  • Dittmer, J., and D. Bos. 2019. Popular culture, geopolitics, and identity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Dodds, K., C. Y. Woon, and L. Xu. 2022. Critical geopolitics. In Critical studies of the arctic, ed. M. Lindroth, H. Sinevaara-Niskanen, and M. Tennberg, 77–98. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-11120-4_5.
  • Dumbrell, J. 2006. A special relationship: Anglo-American relations from the Cold War to Iraq. 2nd ed. London: Red Globe Press.
  • Freeman, E. A. 1873. The history of the Norman conquest of England: Its causes and its results (vol. 2). New York, NY: Clarendon Press for Macmillan and Company.
  • Freeman, E. A. 1877. Race and language. The Contemporary Review 29:711–39.
  • Freeman, E. A. 1881. The historical geography of Europe. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
  • Freeman, E. A. 1882. Some impressions of the United States. The Fortnightly Review 32 (188):133–55, 323–346.
  • Freeman, E. A. n.d. Scrapbook of lecture notes and newspaper cuttings related to Freeman’s lecture tour in the U.S., 1881–1882. Edward Augustus Freeman Papers. Series 5, Box 1, Folder 10. University of Manchester Library Special Collections.
  • Gee, J. P. 2005. An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Higham, J. 1984. Herbert Baxter Adams and the study of local history. The American Historical Review 89 (5):1225–39. doi:10.2307/1867041.
  • Hodder, J., M. Heffernan, and S. Legg. 2021. The archival geographies of twentieth-century internationalism: Nation, empire and race. Journal of Historical Geography 71:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jhg.2020.06.008.
  • Horsman, R. 1976. Origins of racial Anglo-Saxonism in Great Britain before 1850. Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (3):387–410. doi:10.2307/2708805.
  • Horsman, R. 1981. Race and manifest destiny: The origins of American racial Anglo-Saxonism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hosmer, J. K. 1890. A short history of Anglo-Saxon freedom: The Polity of the English-speaking race. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  • Kearns, G. 2003. Imperial geopolitics: Geopolitical visions at the dawn of the American century. In A companion to political geography, ed. J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, and G. Toal, 173–186. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Klinke, I. 2022. A theory for the “Anglo-Saxon mind”: Ellen Churchill Semple’s reinterpretation of Friedrich Ratzel’s Anthropogeographie. Geographica Helvetica 77 (4):467–78. doi:10.5194/gh-77-467-2022.
  • Kramer, P. 2002. Empires, exceptions, and Anglo-Saxons: Race and rule between the British and United States Empires, 1880–1910. The Journal of American History 88 (4):1315–53. doi:10.2307/2700600.
  • Kwon, W., I. Clarke, and R. Wodak. 2014. Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings. Journal of Management Studies 51 (2):265–90. doi:10.1111/joms.12036.
  • Lees, L. 2004. Urban geography: Discourse analysis and urban research. Progress in Human Geography 28 (1):101–7. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph473pr.
  • Müller, M. 2008. Reconsidering the concept of discourse for the field of critical geopolitics: Towards discourse as language and practice. Political Geography 27 (3):322–38. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.12.003.
  • Müller, M. 2010. Doing discourse analysis in critical geopolitics. L’Espace Politique 12 (3).
  • Müller, M. 2016. Text, discourse, affect and things. In The Ashgate research companion to critical geopolitics, ed. K. Dodds, M. Kuus, and J. Sharp, 49–68. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ó Tuathail, G. 1996. Critical geopolitics: The politics of writing global space. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Ó Tuathail, G., and J. Agnew. 1992. Geopolitics and discourse: Practical geopolitical reasoning in American foreign policy. Political Geography 11 (2):190–204. doi:10.1016/0962-6298(92)90048-X.
  • Parker, C. J. W. 1981. The failure of liberal racialism: The racial ideas of E.A. Freeman. The Historical Journal 24 (4):825–46. doi:10.1017/S0018246X00008220.
  • Parmar, I. 2002. Anglo-American elites in the interwar years: Idealism and power in the intellectual roots of Chatham House and the Council on Foreign Relations. International Relations 16 (1):53–75. doi:10.1177/0047117802016001005.
  • Perkins, B. 1968. The great rapprochement: England and the United States, 1895–1914. New York, NY: Atheneum.
  • Reisigl, M., and R. Wodak. 2009. The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In Methods of critical discourse analysis, ed. R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 87–121. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Said, E. W. 1979. Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
  • Schuyler, R. L. 1915. Review of the Pan-Angles, by Sinclair Kennedy. Political Science Quarterly 30 (3):524–5. doi:10.2307/2141764.
  • Scollon, S. 2001. Habitus, consciousness, agency and the problem of intention: How we carry and are carried by political discourses. Folia Linguistica 35 (1-2):97–130. doi:10.1515/flin.2001.35.1-2.97.
  • Sharp, J. 2022. Feminist geopolitics and the global-intimacies of pandemic time. Gender, Place & Culture. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2022.2064834.
  • Tuffnell, S. 2011. “Uncle Sam is to be sacrificed”: Anglophobia in late nineteenth-century politics and culture. American Nineteenth Century History 12 (1):77–99. doi:10.1080/14664658.2011.559749.
  • van Leeuwen, T. 2000. The construction of purpose in discourse. In Discourse and social life, ed. S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard, 66–81. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Vucetic, S. 2011. The anglosphere: A genealogy of a racialized identity in international relations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Wodak, R., R. de Cillia, M. Reisigl, and K. Liebhart. 1999. The discursive construction of national identity. Trans. A. Hirsch and R. Mitten. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.