294
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Practices and Curations

Anthropocene ANCESTORS and the Art of Plotting a Temporal Heist

Pages 197-205 | Received 15 Jun 2023, Accepted 27 Nov 2023, Published online: 22 Apr 2024

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, B. 2019. Cultural geography II: The force of representations. Progress in Human Geography 43 (6):1120–32. doi:10.1177/0309132518761431.
  • Ash, J., R. Gordon, and S. Mills. 2022. Geographies of the event? Rethinking time and power through digital interfaces. Cultural Geographies 30 (1):3–18. doi:10.1177/14744740221086262.
  • Ash, J., and P. Simpson. 2016. Geography and post-phenomenology. Progress in Human Geography 40 (1):48–66. doi:10.1177/0309132514544806.
  • Boetzkes, A. 2015. Ecologicity, vision and the neurological system. In Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among politics, aesthetics, environments and epistemologies, ed. H. Davies and E. Turpin, 271–82. London: Open Humanities Press.
  • Brenna, B. 2014. Nature and texts in glass cases: The vitrine as a tool for textualizing nature. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 2 (1):46–51. doi:10.5324/njsts.v2i1.2136.
  • Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Vastu Sangrahalaya. 2023. Who we are. Accessed June 14, 2023. https://csmvs.in/who-are-we/.
  • Clark, N., and Y. Gunaratnam. 2017. Earthing the anthropos? From “socializing the Anthropocene” to geologizing the social. European Journal of Social Theory 20 (1):146–63. doi:10.1177/1368431016661337.
  • Dalby, S. 2016. Framing the Anthropocene: The good, the bad and the ugly. The Anthropocene Review 3 (1):33–51. doi:10.1177/2053019615618681.
  • Davis, H., and Z. Todd. 2017. On the importance of a date, or decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 16 (4):761–80.
  • D’Lima, T. 2022. Ancestors from another world. Accessed June 14, 2023. https://jnaf.org/press/ancestors-from-another-world/.
  • Fisher, M. 1999. Flatline constructs: Gothic materialism and cybernetic theory-fiction. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
  • Ginn, F., M. Bastian, D. Farrier, and J. Kidwell. 2018. Introduction: Unexpected encounters with deep time. Environmental Humanities 10 (1):213–25. doi:10.1215/22011919-4385534.
  • Glennie, P., and N. Thrift. 2009. Shaping the day: A history of timekeeping in England and Wales 1300–1800. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Haraway, D. 1987. A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Australian Feminist Studies 2 (4):1–42. doi:10.1080/08164649.1987.9961538.
  • Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. London: Duke University Press.
  • Harman, G. 2018. Object-oriented ontology: A new theory of everything. London: Penguin Books.
  • Harris, D. M. 2020. Expanding climate science: Using science fiction’s worldbuilding to imagine a climate changed southwestern us. Literary Geographies 6 (1):59–76.
  • Hones, S. 2008. Text as it happens: Literary geography. Geography Compass 2 (5):1301–17. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00143.x.
  • Lorimer, J. 2017. The anthropo-scene: A guide for the perplexed. Social Studies of Science 47 (1):117–42. doi:10.1177/0306312716671039.
  • Lövbrand, E., S. Beck, J. Chilvers, T. Forsyth, J. Hedrén, M. Hulme, R. Lidskog, and E. Vasileiadou. 2015. Who speaks for the future of earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 32:211–8. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012.
  • Malhi, Y. 2017. The concept of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42 (1):77–104. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060854.
  • Mclean, F. 1998. Museums and the construction of national identity: A review. International Journal of Heritage Studies 3 (4):244–52. doi:10.1080/13527259808722211.
  • Meehan, K., I. G. R. Shaw, and S. A. Marston. 2013. Political geographies of the object. Political Geography 33:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.11.002.
  • Morton, T. 2013. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Negarestani, R. 2008. Cyclonopedia: Complicity with anonymous materials. Melbourne: Re.Press.
  • Saunders, A. 2013. The spatial event of writing: John Galsworthy and the creation of fraternity. Cultural Geographies 20 (3):285–98. doi:10.1177/1474474013477774.
  • Sellars, W. 2007. In the space of reasons: Selected essays of Wilfrid Sellars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Shaw, I. G. R., and K. Meehan. 2013. Force-full: Power, politics and object-oriented philosophy. Area 45 (2):216–22. doi:10.1111/area.12023.
  • Szerszynski, B. 2017a. From the Anthropocene epoch to a new axial age: Using theory fictions to explore geo-spiritual futures. In Religion in the Anthropocene, ed. C. Deane-Drummonds, S. Bergmann, and M. Vogt, 35–52. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.
  • Szerszynski, B. 2017b. Gods of the Anthropocene: Geo-spiritual formations in the earth’s new epoch. Theory, Culture & Society 34 (2-3):253–75. doi:10.1177/0263276417691102.
  • Thórsson, B. 2020. Walking through the Anthropocene. Encountering materialisations of the geological epoch in an exhibition space. Nordisk Museologi 28 (1):103. doi:10.5617/nm.7986.
  • Tsing, A. L., N. Bubandt, E. Gan, and H. A. Swanson. 2017. Arts of living on a damaged planet: Ghosts and monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Zalasiewicz, J. 2009. The earth after us: What legacy will humans leave in the rocks? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.