Referencs
- Badhwar, N. K. (2005). Moral worth and the worth of rights. T. Machan (Ed.). Stanford: Hoover Institute Press.
- Causer, T., & Wallace, V. (2012). Building a volunteer community: Results and findings from Transcribe Bentham. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 6 (2). Retrieved from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/6/2/000125/000125.html
- Dholakia, U. (2015). My experience as an Amazon Mechanical Turn (MTurk). Worker, Linkedin.com. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/my-experience-amazon-mechanical-turk-mturk-worker-utpal-dholakia
- Haythornthwaite, C. (2009). Crowds and communities: Light and heavyweight models of peer production. Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaiian Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). Waikola, HI: IEEE Computer Society.
- Jacquet, J. (2011). The pros and cons of Amazon Mechanical Turk for scientific surveys. Scientific American. Retrieved from http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guilty-planet/httpblogsscientificam…0110707the-pros-cons-of-amazon-mechanical-turk-for-scientific-surveys/
- Marvit, M. Z. (2014). How crowdworkers became the ghosts in the digital machine. The Nation. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.com/article/how-crowdworkers-became-ghosts-digital-machine/
- Mims, C. (2010). How Mechanical Turk is broken. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/416966/how-mechanical-turk-is-broken/
- Smith, S. (2012). Why do people participate as respondents in a survey? Qualtrics, Survey Tips. Retrieved from https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/why-do-people-participate-as-respondents-in-a-survey/
- Von Hippel, E., & Von Krogh, G., (2003). Open source software and the private-collective innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209–223.