Speech, Harm, and the Duties of Digital Intermediaries: Conceptualizing Platform Ethics

References

• Adam, G. S., Craft, S., & Cohen, E. D. (2004). Three essays on journalism and virtue. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 19(3&4), 247–275.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D. S., & Hindman, E. B. (2014). The media and democracy: Using democratic theory in journalism ethics. In W. N. Wyatt (Ed.), The ethics of journalism: Individual, institutional, and cultural influences (pp. 185–203). London, England: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Ammori, M. (2012). First Amendment architecture. Wisconsin Law Review, 2012(1), 1–83.
   Google Scholar
• Balkin, J. (2004). Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for the information society. New York University Law Review, 79(1), 1–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. P. (1996). A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Retrieved from https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2008). An informal agenda for media ethicists. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 23(1), 28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollinger, L. C. (1986). The tolerant society: Freedom of speech and extreme speech in America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braman, S., & Roberts, S. (2003). Advantage ISP: Terms of service as media law. New Media & Society, 5(3), 422–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, J., & Gillespie, T. (2011). Hosting the public discourse, hosting the public. Journalism Practice, 5(4), 383–398.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond: From production to produsage. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A. (2014, October 21). The laborers who keep dick pics and beheadings out of your Facebook Feed. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/.
   Google Scholar
• Christians, C. G., & Nordenstreng, K. (2004). Social responsibility worldwide. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 19(1), 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2013). Why media ethics still matters. In S. J. A. Ward (Ed.), Global media ethics: problems and perspectives (pp. 13–29). West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. & Gillespie, T. (2014). What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint. New Media & Society.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubbink, W., & Van Liederkerke, L. (2014). Grounding positive duties in commercial life. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(4), 527–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A., Flanagin, C., & Flanagin, J. (2010). Technical code and the social construction of the Internet. New Media & Society, 12(2), 179–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, M. (2011). Unwilling avatars: Idealism and discrimination in cyberspace. Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 20, 224–261.
   Google Scholar
• Gajda, A. (2015). The First Amendment bubble: How privacy and paparazzi threaten a free press. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of platforms. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J., & Wu, T. (2006). Who controls the Internet? Illusions of a borderless world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., & Waldman, P. (2003). The press effect: Politicians, journalists, and the stories that shape the political world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, N., & Boczkowski, P. (2012). From principle to practice: Expanding the scope of scholarship on media ethics. Ethical Space, 9(4), 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Keats Citron, D. (2014). Hate crimes in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (2006). Code: Ver. 2.0, New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 836–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidsky, L. B. (2011). Incendiary speech and social media. Texas Tech Law Review, 44(1), 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Lipinski, T. A., Buchanan, E. A., & Britz, J. J. (2002). Sticks and stones and words that harm: Liability vs. responsibility, Section 230 and defamatory speech in cyberspace. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(2), 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, G. M., & Longhi, J. V. R. (2014). Internet service providers’ liability for personal damages on social networking websites. U.S.-China Law Review, 11(3), 286–309.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, C., Wyatt, W. N., Borden, S. L., & Wasserman, E. (2012). Professionalism, not professionals. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 27(3), 189–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunziato, D. (2009). Virtual freedom: Net neutrality and free speech in the Internet age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Overholser, G., Hall Jamieson, K. (Ed.). (2005). The press. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, M. (2002). International law and the search for universal principles in journalism ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 17(3), 193–208.
   Google Scholar
• Plaisance, P. L. (2000). The concept of media accountability reconsidered. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 15(4), 257–268.
   Google Scholar
• Plaisance, P. L. (2005). The mass media as discursive network: Building on the implications of libertarian and communitarian claims for news media ethics theory. Communication Theory, 15(3), 292–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaisance, P. L. (2007). Transparency: An assessment of the Kantian roots of a key element in media ethics practice. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(2&3), 187–207.
   Google Scholar
• Post, R. C. (1991). Racist speech, democracy, and the First Amendment. William & Mary Law Review, 32(2), 267–327.
   Google Scholar
• Post, R. C. (1995). Constitutional domains. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. E., & Verhulst, S. G. (2005). Self-regulation and the Internet. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, I. (2004). Stakeholders versus shareholders: Journalism, business, and ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 19(2), 119–129.
   Google Scholar
• Schaedel, U., & Clement, M. (2010). Managing the online crowd: Motivations for engagement in user-generated content. Journal of Media Business Studies, 7(3), 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Seng, D. (2010). Comparative analysis of the national approaches to the liability of Internet intermediaries. World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/copyright/en/doc/liability_of_internet_intermediaries.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smolla, R. (1992). Free speech in an open society. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Souder, L. (2010). A free-market model for media ethics: Adam Smith’s looking glass. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 25(1), 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, M. L. (2006). Infotainment and the moral obligations of the multimedia conglomerate. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(2–3), 253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. (2006). Business service model promotes better newspapers. Newspaper Research Journal, 27(4), 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, D. E. (1991). Where morality and law diverge: Ethical alternatives in the Soldier of Fortune cases. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 6(2), 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Tushnet, R. (2008). Power without responsibility: Intermediaries and the First Amendment. George Washington Law Review, 76(4),986–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, M. (2008). The externalities of search 2.0: The emerging privacy threats when the drive for the perfect search engine meets web 2.0. First Monday, 13(3).
   Google Scholar
• Zittrain, J. (2006). A history of online gatekeeping. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 19(2), 253–298.
   Google Scholar
• Zittrain, J. (2008). The future of the Internet—and how to stop it. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar